Skip to content

Reddit will block the Internet Archive

Technology
156 101 1.6k
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • VSCode Marketplace Extensions Installer for VSCodium-based IDEs

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    10 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • A letter to the CalyxOS community

    Technology technology
    5
    39 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    28 Aufrufe
    01189998819991197253@infosec.pub0
    So they're conducting security audits in line with best practices post executive terminations, and, as a result, security updates are being delayed up to 6 months. They're also recommending alternatives for the time being for those who may be targeted (example being human rights activists). Considering the reasoning, I can't hold this against them. Also considering many are still rocking android 10 or iOS 15, this update pause (hopefully just a pause) isn't the worst thing in the world.
  • Microsoft exec admits it 'cannot guarantee' data sovereignty

    Technology technology
    19
    1
    297 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    112 Aufrufe
    S
    The cloud is just someone else’s computer.
  • Why front-end development will persist

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    19 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    37 Aufrufe
    H
    An LLM has “zero context” about your project’s specific stack and style guidelines. In other words, an AI might produce a generic <Modal> component, but integrating it into your app’s unique architecture is still a human task. This is very old. Nowadays, in Copilot for example, you add files to context and tell "hey look how I did that thing there, do this new thing following the same structure, with the same naming conventions" and it's enough. And tools like Cursor just throw your whole project into context by default.
  • 42 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    59 Aufrufe
    S
    So they're doing good work at least.
  • 270 Stimmen
    80 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    S
    that sub seems to be fully brigaded by bots from marketing team of closed-ai and preplexity
  • 92 Stimmen
    42 Beiträge
    409 Aufrufe
    G
    You don’t understand. The tracking and spying is the entire point of the maneuver. The ‘children are accessing porn’ thing is just a Trojan horse to justify the spying. I understand what are you saying, I simply don't consider to check if a law is applied as a Trojan horse in itself. I would agree if the EU had said to these sites "give us all the the access log, a list of your subscriber, every data you gather and a list of every IP it ever connected to your site", and even this way does not imply that with only the IP you could know who the user is without even asking the telecom company for help. So, is it a Trojan horse ? Maybe, it heavily depend on how the EU want to do it. If they just ask "show me how you try to avoid that a minor access your material", which normally is the fist step, I don't see how it could be a Trojan horse. It could become, I agree on that. As you pointed out, it’s already illegal for them to access it, and parents are legally required to prevent their children from accessing it. No, parents are not legally required to prevent it. The seller (or provider) is legally required. It is a subtle but important difference. But you don’t lock down the entire population, or institute pre-crime surveillance policies, just because some parents are not going to follow the law. True. You simply impose laws that make mandatories for the provider to check if he can sell/serve something to someone. I mean asking that the cashier of mall check if I am an adult when I buy a bottle of wine is no different than asking to Pornhub to check if the viewer is an adult. I agree that in one case is really simple and in the other is really hard (and it is becoming harder by the day). You then charge the guilty parents after the offense. Ok, it would work, but then how do you caught the offendind parents if not checking what everyone do ? Is it not simpler to try to prevent it instead ?