Skip to content

A letter to the CalyxOS community

Technology
5 5 28
  • 300 Stimmen
    42 Beiträge
    179 Aufrufe
    I
    Just because it's a bad idea doesn't mean it wont be implemented.
  • 100R — working offgrid efficiently

    Technology technology
    4
    30 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    56 Aufrufe
    M
    Love 100 rabbits! They have some very interesting projects and articles.
  • Junior dev's code worked in tests, deleted data in prod

    Technology technology
    6
    1
    91 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    114 Aufrufe
    S
    The second one is a testament to why you should always run it as a SELECT statement first to verify you typed it correctly.
  • 250 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    178 Aufrufe
    rivalarrival@lemmy.todayR
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oskar_Schindler
  • Large Language Model Performance Doubles Every 7 Months

    Technology technology
    53
    1
    100 Stimmen
    53 Beiträge
    690 Aufrufe
    V
    in yes/no type questions, 50% success rate is the absolute worst one can do. Any worse and you're just giving an inverted correct answer more than half the time
  • 9 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    63 Aufrufe
    F
    You said it yourself: extra places that need human attention ... those need ... humans, right? It's easy to say "let AI find the mistakes". But that tells us nothing at all. There's no substance. It's just a sales pitch for snake oil. In reality, there are various ways one can leverage technology to identify various errors, but that only happens through the focused actions of people who actually understand the details of what's happening. And think about it here. We already have computer systems that monitor patients' real-time data when they're hospitalized. We already have systems that check for allergies in prescribed medication. We already have systems for all kinds of safety mechanisms. We're already using safety tech in hospitals, so what can be inferred from a vague headline about AI doing something that's ... checks notes ... already being done? ... Yeah, the safe money is that it's just a scam.
  • Signal – an ethical replacement for WhatsApp

    Technology technology
    235
    1
    1k Stimmen
    235 Beiträge
    6k Aufrufe
    V
    What I said is that smart people can be convinced to move to another platform. Most of my friends are not technically inclined, but it was easy to make them use it, at least to chat with me. What you did is change "smart people" with "people who already want to move", which is not the same. You then said it's not something you can choose (as you cannot choose to be rich). But I answered that you can actually choose your friends. Never did I say people who are not interested in niche technologies are not smart. My statement can be rephrased in an equivalent statement "people who cannot be convinced to change are not smart", and I stand to it.
  • Was ist ChatGPT?

    Technology technology
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    30 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet