We Should Immediately Nationalize SpaceX and Starlink
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 7. Juni 2025, 15:37 zuletzt editiert von
Maybe... But never going to happen. Privitization and capitalism work the other way in the imperial core.
-
Has anyone considered funding NASA?
They made rockets that didn't explode with duct tape and a TI-83 calculator.
schrieb am 7. Juni 2025, 15:37 zuletzt editiert von technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6. Juli 2025, 17:39Where's the grift tho? What's the angle? How will this enrich an uber-privileged pale bro?
-
Despotic Ibrahim Traoré, using the money from nationalised formerly French gold mines to checks notes give $180.000.000 to farmers in farm equipment to industrialise agriculture. So despotic and antidemocratic.
schrieb am 7. Juni 2025, 15:38 zuletzt editiert vonwow, tell me you know nothing about West Africa without telling me you know nothing about West Africa.
I'm all for the Sahellian states getting rid of the French, but the Burkinabe gold mining system is pure chaos, often costing informal miners their lives. Burkina, in particular, didn't have anything other than use of the CFA really tying them to the French anyway. Sure, some gold mines, but that's more like a final vestige.
Like, just overall, Bukina Faso is a weird place. Every time I've been there, the only bird I really see around is vultures. Like, no doves, no pigeons. Just vultures.
-
Has anyone considered funding NASA?
They made rockets that didn't explode with duct tape and a TI-83 calculator.
schrieb am 7. Juni 2025, 15:38 zuletzt editiert vonIf that was actually their expenditure I don't think they'd have their budget cut.
-
Yeah, let's give the trump administration the power to seize companies it doesn't like, that is a great idea that def won't be abused all the time
schrieb am 7. Juni 2025, 15:39 zuletzt editiert von technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6. Juli 2025, 17:43The author probably forgot who runs the nation of usa.
-
We no longer live in a world where our biggest fear would be the government controlling high level corporations and their operators.
We now live in a world controlled by Sociopathic Oligarchs who can afford to create government level technology. Right now it's mostly tourism rockets and satellites, but now we see Skum weaponizing that technology, and/or using it as a bargaining chip. He has cut off Starlink in a war zone to benefit the county who defers to him, but is openly hostile to the US, and now he's threatening to cut off our access to the space station. He is using tech that WE PAY FOR with government contracts and grants, to pursue his own diplomacy, for his own benefit, and against our interests.
Eventually, someone will start building and stockpiling actual weapons, perhaps even atomics. Then we will be asking why someone didn't step in and stop them before they became a bonafide threat.
We paid for Skum's technology, and he gets to control it as a courtesy. Just the threat of using it against us should be enough reason to declare him a national security threat, confiscate his American-taxpayer financed businesses, and imprison him.
schrieb am 7. Juni 2025, 15:40 zuletzt editiert von technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6. Juli 2025, 17:42Eventually, someone will start building and stockpiling actual weapons, perhaps even atomics. Then we will be asking why someone didn’t step in and stop them before they became a bonafide threat.
Bruh this has already happened over and over again. Nobody stops them because the most violence empire on the planet is leading the way. AFAIK the USA is the only state to have actually nuked people.
See also the zio regime. Imperial allies supreme.
-
It sounds like we don't disagree that much, I just think other doubting nations is extremely likely.
Edit: but gosh darn that is nice to imagine. Everyone, everywhere, having free internet.
schrieb am 7. Juni 2025, 15:41 zuletzt editiert vonYeah.
The maintenance of these conatellations is pricy, so perhaps if such an international program does prove itself trustworthy you'd see other national alternatives get retired.I mean it's not like the US would do it anyway as things stand, more likely for such a program to get started independently and to end up outcompeting starlink down the line.
-
We? No. USA can if it wants that shit.
schrieb am 7. Juni 2025, 15:43 zuletzt editiert von technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6. Juli 2025, 17:45Global communities reveal the disgusting chauvinism of the nationalist "we". It's cult speech.
-
Airport security was nationalized as the TSA. Aside from that no.
schrieb am 7. Juni 2025, 15:46 zuletzt editiert vonSo it takes a spectacular failure of capitalist grifters? Check.
-
Technically the auto industry in 2008.
schrieb am 7. Juni 2025, 15:48 zuletzt editiert vonTechnically no. Bailout =/= nationalization.
-
The agency that landed people on the moon so long ago most of the people involved have died if old age, and the event will soon pass out of living memory?
The one where when they let a single rocket explode, one time, rocked the nation, because their record was so close to flawless?
The one that constantly gives us new sources for scientific data?
Yeah fuck them. They never made a dick rocket.
schrieb am 7. Juni 2025, 15:55 zuletzt editiert vonlet’s not forget the agency that launched the probe that passed the edge of the solar system and is still functional and doing valuable things…… in the 70s
-
let’s not forget the agency that launched the probe that passed the edge of the solar system and is still functional and doing valuable things…… in the 70s
schrieb am 7. Juni 2025, 15:58 zuletzt editiert vonand is still functional and doing valuable things in the 70s
Oh, wow, you might wanna sit down for this.
-
and is still functional and doing valuable things in the 70s
Oh, wow, you might wanna sit down for this.
schrieb am 7. Juni 2025, 16:02 zuletzt editiert vonwhich part? it’s still transmitting right? and they got useful and interesting data from it only a few years ago
-
Agreed. But also commies believe that when the state takes something, "we" will get it (and they fail to see why states sponsor their useful idiocy)
schrieb am 7. Juni 2025, 16:03 zuletzt editiert von darleys_brew@lemmy.ml 6. Juli 2025, 18:04The point of communism is that things are state owned.
-
which part? it’s still transmitting right? and they got useful and interesting data from it only a few years ago
schrieb am 7. Juni 2025, 16:03 zuletzt editiert von outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6. Juli 2025, 18:09No, honey, it's 2025.
I don't know what happened to you, but im so fucking sorry.
Edit: you can down vote me all you want. It doesn't change the truth. Odds are everyone you knew is dead.
-
American exceptionalism is so fucking annoying. Their country is failing to a point hopefully this first person shit rightfully corrects to third person.
schrieb am 7. Juni 2025, 16:03 zuletzt editiert vonIt’s worse here than on Reddit, IMO.
-
So you want Donald Trump in charge of the telecom industry and any other industries that have received some sort of public subsidy?
schrieb am 7. Juni 2025, 16:08 zuletzt editiert vonYeah, maybe we can nationalize them with the clause that it kicks in when his heart stops beating
-
Governments: spend 80 years developing space tech with public funding, allowing humanity to walk on the moon, have global positioning satellites, and essentially kickstart the computing industry from a necessity to build computers for orbital calculations
Private companies: mostly disappear and waste shareholder money, like Virgin or like Bezos' attempts at space, with one company with public funding raking in those 80 years of publicly-funded research to itself, underpaying and exploiting its engineers, and lowering the costs at the expense of safety due to cutting in safety measures thay will never be tolerated when humans ride those rockets
Dumbass liberal lemmitor: pRiVaTe Is ClEaRlY sUpErIoR
Also, you're focusing on the space agency of the most corrupt developed country in the world: the USA. Maybe compare the costs with those of the Chinese Space Agency?
schrieb am 7. Juni 2025, 16:09 zuletzt editiert vonGovernments: spend 80 years developing space tech with public funding, allowing humanity to walk on the moon, have global positioning satellites, and essentially kickstart the computing industry from a necessity to build computers for orbital calculations
Yes, government funded endeavors are sometimes the only way to do things that don't have a clear ROI but they are also incredibly inefficient and as such should be kept only until it becomes viable for the private sector to take over.
Private companies: *mostly disappear and waste shareholder money, like Virgin or like Bezos' attempts at space
That's the beauty of the private sector, pure meritocracy, if you suck - you die. If those were public initiatives they would have been kept regardless of the costs or the results, wasting the taxpayer's money instead of the shareholders'.
one company with public funding raking in those 80 years of publicly-funded research to itself
If it was that easy NASA or all the failed companies you mentioned would have done it themselves. SpaceX has done an absolutely incredible job at innovating in the industry that has been in stagnation since the 80s, designing rapidly reusable rockets, lowering the cost per kg to LEO from $72k in today's money, from the space shuttle days to $2500 and planing to reduce it to $10 with starship.
The public funding part doesn't mean free money from the government, the government pays SpaceX for fulfilling contracts because NASA can't do it themselves, at least not as efficiently as SpaceX. Right now majority of SpaceX's revenue comes from starlink which mainly serves private consumers so it's reliance on the government contracts is being overstated.
underpaying and exploiting its engineers
SpaceX $155K-$247K/yr ($117K - $175K/yr base pay + $39K - $72K/yr stock)
NASA $113K - $158K/yr
lowering the costs at the expense of safety due to cutting in safety measures thay will never be tolerated when humans ride those rockets
As of 2025, SpaceX is the only U.S. company with a human-rated rocket system certified by NASA for regular flights to the International Space Station. NASA completed the certification of SpaceX's Crew Dragon spacecraft and Falcon 9 rocket in 2023, marking the first time a commercial system was certified for human spaceflight.
Dumbass liberal lemmitor: pRiVaTe Is ClEaRlY sUpErIoR
Yes.
-
Yeah, maybe we can nationalize them with the clause that it kicks in when his heart stops beating
schrieb am 7. Juni 2025, 16:13 zuletzt editiert von chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 6. Juli 2025, 18:14This is the same mistake everyone makes. They think Donald Trump is just a person. That he actually matters and we just have to get rid of him and everything will be okay.
It doesn’t work that way.
As fascism didn’t die with Hitler, it’s not going to die with Trump. All of the problems — all of the rifts in our society — will still be there when he’s gone.
-
Shouldn't be incompatible with nationalizing SpaceX and Starlink. Just give it all to NASA, actually.
schrieb am 7. Juni 2025, 16:14 zuletzt editiert vonSure, that's the ideal.
Is it likely? Ehhhh
-
-
Houthi-linked dealers sell arms on X and WhatsApp, report says
Technology496 vor 28 Tagenvor 28 Tagen1
-
eSIM Vulnerability in Kigen's eUICC Cards Exposes Billions of IoT Devices to Malicious Attacks
Technology496 vor 28 Tagen14. Juli 2025, 12:271
-
-
Robot eyes are power hungry. What if we gave them tools inspired by the human brain?
Technology 20. Juni 2025, 05:511
-
-
YouTube relaxes moderation rules to allow more controversial content. Videos are allowed if "freedom of expression value may outweigh harm risk"
Technology 11. Juni 2025, 17:221
-