Skip to content

Reddit in talks to embrace Sam Altman’s iris-scanning Orb to verify users

Technology
154 121 4.2k
  • Tesla loses Autopilot wrongful death case in $329 million verdict

    Technology technology
    184
    1
    1k Stimmen
    184 Beiträge
    644 Aufrufe
    6
    They wouldn't have used that tactic because they're in the files also. Murca needs reform badly.
  • 1k Stimmen
    352 Beiträge
    4k Aufrufe
    nutwrench@lemmy.mlN
    Well, "dark traffic" sounds SCARY. You wouldn't want to do anything scary, would you? Like, use the computer you paid for to control the content you want to see? /s
  • 209 Stimmen
    25 Beiträge
    751 Aufrufe
    R
    Either that has happened to more than one people or it was literally me that happened to hah, but on my lemm.ee account (RIP)
  • OpenAI's $210K Residency Program Tackles AI Talent Shortage

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    7 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    37 Aufrufe
    R
    Why don’t they use AI to replace human AI developers?
  • 47 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    157 Aufrufe
    N
    They don't treat their people like shit, they treat them like slaves. In countries outside China at that. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3v5n7w55kpo
  • 149 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    127 Aufrufe
    M
    Don't get them wrong, they don't do this for you, or even morals. It just affects other interests too much.
  • It is OutfinityGift project better then all NFTs?

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 310 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    374 Aufrufe
    S
    Same, especially when searching technical or niche topics. Since there aren't a ton of results specific to the topic, mostly semi-related results will appear in the first page or two of a regular (non-Gemini) Google search, just due to the higher popularity of those webpages compared to the relevant webpages. Even the relevant webpages will have lots of non-relevant or semi-relevant information surrounding the answer I'm looking for. I don't know enough about it to be sure, but Gemini is probably just scraping a handful of websites on the first page, and since most of those are only semi-related, the resulting summary is a classic example of garbage in, garbage out. I also think there's probably something in the code that looks for information that is shared across multiple sources and prioritizing that over something that's only on one particular page (possibly the sole result with the information you need). Then, it phrases the summary as a direct answer to your query, misrepresenting the actual information on the pages they scraped. At least Gemini gives sources, I guess. The thing that gets on my nerves the most is how often I see people quote the summary as proof of something without checking the sources. It was bad before the rollout of Gemini, but at least back then Google was mostly scraping text and presenting it with little modification, along with a direct link to the webpage. Now, it's an LLM generating text phrased as a direct answer to a question (that was also AI-generated from your search query) using AI-summarized data points scraped from multiple webpages. It's obfuscating the source material further, but I also can't help but feel like it exposes a little of the behind-the-scenes fuckery Google has been doing for years before Gemini. How it bastardizes your query by interpreting it into a question, and then prioritizes homogeneous results that agree on the "answer" to your "question". For years they've been doing this to a certain extent, they just didn't share how they interpreted your query.