Skip to content

Rule34 blocked the UK entirely rather than comply due to the new law.

Technology
178 109 29
  • 252 Stimmen
    90 Beiträge
    39 Aufrufe
    horse@feddit.orgH
    Kobe Bryant dedicated all his waking hours to basketball, and I don’t think there’s a lot of people saying that Kobe Bryant shouldn’t have worked as hard as he did. Yeah, but he was working to achieve something for himself and not to make some parasite richer.
  • 34 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    33 Aufrufe
    P
    I like it. Lots of buzzwords that warn me off the article. Like a brightly coloured bug - message received little guy, I will not touch you.
  • On PH today – would love support

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Windows 11 finally overtakes Windows 10 [in marketshare]

    Technology technology
    32
    1
    63 Stimmen
    32 Beiträge
    190 Aufrufe
    H
    Yeah, and its most likely only due to them killing Windows 10 in the fall, which means a lot of companies have been working hard this year to replace a ton of computers before October. Anyone who has been down this road with 7 to 10 knows it will just cost more money if you need to continue support after that. They sell you a new license thats good for a year that will allow updates to continue. It doubles in cost every year after.
  • ZenthexAI - Next-Generation AI Penetration Testing Platform

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 462 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    421 Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.
  • 80 Stimmen
    27 Beiträge
    101 Aufrufe
    lanusensei87@lemmy.worldL
    Consider the possibility that you don't need to be doing anything wrong besides existing to be persecuted by a fascist regime.
  • 360 Stimmen
    24 Beiträge
    122 Aufrufe
    F
    If only they didn’t fake it to get their desired result, then maybe it could have been useful. I agree that LiDAR and other technologies should be used in conjunction with regular cameras. I don’t know why anyone would be against that unless they have vested interests. For various reasons though I understand that it isn’t always possible - price being a big one.