Skip to content

ZenthexAI - Next-Generation AI Penetration Testing Platform

Technology
1 1 0
  • 🧨 Stop manually pentesting.
    I built an AI that thinks like a red team — and it’s nearly ready.
    🔥 Hey folks,
    I've been quietly working on something that could genuinely shift the game for:

    🧑‍💻 Pentesters

    🕵️‍♂️ Red teamers

    👾 Offensive security researchers

    👾 Imagine this:
    An AI that doesn’t just scan — it thinks like a hacker.

    It can:

    🕵️ Perform recon

    🔍 Find vulnerabilities

    🎯 Recommend & run exploits

    📈 Escalate privileges

    🔐 Crack hashes

    📋 Generate full reports

    🧠 Learn from each step

    ⚠️ Not just ChatGPT slapped on top.
    This is a custom-built engine that merges proven tools with AI-driven automation and logic.

    💡 Why I’m posting now:
    I’m not selling anything — there's nothing to buy (yet).
    I'm sharing this now because:

    💬 I want feedback from real security pros

    🔎 Curious what the community thinks about AI red teaming

    👥 Looking for early beta testers before launch

    🧰 Quick features:

    🛠️ Fully customizable AI pipeline (not a black box)

    🖱️ No-code interface, but CLI-ready for pros

    🤖 Built for real automation, not shortcuts

    🌐 Web portal ready · 🧬 Desktop agent in progress · 💬 Discord ready

    🔗 Links:

    🌍** Website & signup:** https://www.zenthex.online/

    💬 Discord (early access & updates): https://discord.gg/tZu5tJ8pYj

    🧪 Beta tester form is open now

    💭 So tell me:
    If you had access to an AI that could simulate an entire red team’s workflow…

    🧠 What would you trust it with?

    🚫 Where would you draw the line?

    Drop your thoughts — feature wishes, concerns, feedback, or just curious questions.
    Would love to hear from fellow hackers & builders. 🧩

    Link Preview Image
  • video gen error

    Technology technology
    8
    2
    2 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    H
    Sorry what? You mean post to technology@lemmy.world?
  • 262 Stimmen
    32 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    gallopingsnail@lemmy.sdf.orgG
    This guy's full of shit. You can talk all you want on the HF bands, they're certainly not exclusively for contesting. You can do Morse code or digital modes too. The "most actual communication is illegal on ham bands" thing is wrong too, you can talk about pretty much anything you want as long as it's not "obscene or profane," according to the FCC.
  • 18 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Uber, Lyft oppose some bills that aim to prevent assaults during rides

    Technology technology
    12
    94 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    8 Aufrufe
    F
    California is not Colorado nor is it federal No shit, did you even read my comment? Regulations already exist in every state that ride share companies operate in, including any state where taxis operate. People are already not supposed to sexually assault their passengers. Will adding another regulation saying they shouldn’t do that, even when one already exists, suddenly stop it from happening? No. Have you even looked at the regulations in Colorado for ride share drivers and companies? I’m guessing not. Here are the ones that were made in 2014: https://law.justia.com/codes/colorado/2021/title-40/article-10-1/part-6/section-40-10-1-605/#%3A~%3Atext=§+40-10.1-605.+Operational+Requirements+A+driver+shall+not%2Ca+ride%2C+otherwise+known+as+a+“street+hail”. Here’s just one little but relevant section: Before a person is permitted to act as a driver through use of a transportation network company's digital network, the person shall: Obtain a criminal history record check pursuant to the procedures set forth in section 40-10.1-110 as supplemented by the commission's rules promulgated under section 40-10.1-110 or through a privately administered national criminal history record check, including the national sex offender database; and If a privately administered national criminal history record check is used, provide a copy of the criminal history record check to the transportation network company. A driver shall obtain a criminal history record check in accordance with subparagraph (I) of paragraph (a) of this subsection (3) every five years while serving as a driver. A person who has been convicted of or pled guilty or nolo contendere to driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol in the previous seven years before applying to become a driver shall not serve as a driver. If the criminal history record check reveals that the person has ever been convicted of or pled guilty or nolo contendere to any of the following felony offenses, the person shall not serve as a driver: (c) (I) A person who has been convicted of or pled guilty or nolo contendere to driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol in the previous seven years before applying to become a driver shall not serve as a driver. If the criminal history record check reveals that the person has ever been convicted of or pled guilty or nolo contendere to any of the following felony offenses, the person shall not serve as a driver: An offense involving fraud, as described in article 5 of title 18, C.R.S.; An offense involving unlawful sexual behavior, as defined in section 16-22-102 (9), C.R.S.; An offense against property, as described in article 4 of title 18, C.R.S.; or A crime of violence, as described in section 18-1.3-406, C.R.S. A person who has been convicted of a comparable offense to the offenses listed in subparagraph (I) of this paragraph (c) in another state or in the United States shall not serve as a driver. A transportation network company or a third party shall retain true and accurate results of the criminal history record check for each driver that provides services for the transportation network company for at least five years after the criminal history record check was conducted. A person who has, within the immediately preceding five years, been convicted of or pled guilty or nolo contendere to a felony shall not serve as a driver. Before permitting an individual to act as a driver on its digital network, a transportation network company shall obtain and review a driving history research report for the individual. An individual with the following moving violations shall not serve as a driver: More than three moving violations in the three-year period preceding the individual's application to serve as a driver; or A major moving violation in the three-year period preceding the individual's application to serve as a driver, whether committed in this state, another state, or the United States, including vehicular eluding, as described in section 18-9-116.5, C.R.S., reckless driving, as described in section 42-4-1401, C.R.S., and driving under restraint, as described in section 42-2-138, C.R.S. A transportation network company or a third party shall retain true and accurate results of the driving history research report for each driver that provides services for the transportation network company for at least three years. So all sorts of criminal history, driving record, etc checks have been required since 2014. Colorado were actually the first state in the USA to implement rules like this for ride share companies lol.
  • 77 Stimmen
    21 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    G
    Because the trillions is the point.. Not security.
  • 396 Stimmen
    24 Beiträge
    20 Aufrufe
    devfuuu@lemmy.worldD
    Lots of people have kids nowadays in their houses, we should ban all of that and out them all in a specialized center or something. I can't imagine what all those people are doing with kids behind close doors under he guise of "family". Truly scary if you think about it.
  • 33 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    rooki@lemmy.worldR
    Woah in 2 years, that will be definitly not be forgotten until then....
  • The mystery of $MELANIA

    Technology technology
    13
    1
    25 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    geekwithsoul@lemm.eeG
    Archive