Skip to content

Operation Narnia: Iran’s nuclear scientists reportedly killed simultaneously using special weapon

Technology
364 173 0
  • YouTube’s new anti-adblock measures

    Technology technology
    53
    214 Stimmen
    53 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    W
    Nebula has some of the best educational content, especially ever since Tom Scott went on to other things. There are definitely some weird ones on there, as well as a couple which I'm convinced are right-wing shills, but by and large many of the best edutainment channels have collected over there, especially if you're into writing/world building. HAI/Wendover, Minutephysics, legaleagle, extracredits, nilered, and hellofutureme are the big ones I'm aware of that are also popular on YouTube which publish their videos over on Nebula. It's well worth it to know that you're supporting them more directly, and no ads. Also, dropout (nee collegehumor) is worth it.
  • Do you remember Windows 95? How about Windows 96?

    Technology technology
    32
    77 Stimmen
    32 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    M
    Ha, thanks for searching!
  • Climate science

    Technology technology
    12
    2
    138 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    1 Aufrufe
    Z
    What is the connection to technology here?
  • 310 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    S
    Same, especially when searching technical or niche topics. Since there aren't a ton of results specific to the topic, mostly semi-related results will appear in the first page or two of a regular (non-Gemini) Google search, just due to the higher popularity of those webpages compared to the relevant webpages. Even the relevant webpages will have lots of non-relevant or semi-relevant information surrounding the answer I'm looking for. I don't know enough about it to be sure, but Gemini is probably just scraping a handful of websites on the first page, and since most of those are only semi-related, the resulting summary is a classic example of garbage in, garbage out. I also think there's probably something in the code that looks for information that is shared across multiple sources and prioritizing that over something that's only on one particular page (possibly the sole result with the information you need). Then, it phrases the summary as a direct answer to your query, misrepresenting the actual information on the pages they scraped. At least Gemini gives sources, I guess. The thing that gets on my nerves the most is how often I see people quote the summary as proof of something without checking the sources. It was bad before the rollout of Gemini, but at least back then Google was mostly scraping text and presenting it with little modification, along with a direct link to the webpage. Now, it's an LLM generating text phrased as a direct answer to a question (that was also AI-generated from your search query) using AI-summarized data points scraped from multiple webpages. It's obfuscating the source material further, but I also can't help but feel like it exposes a little of the behind-the-scenes fuckery Google has been doing for years before Gemini. How it bastardizes your query by interpreting it into a question, and then prioritizes homogeneous results that agree on the "answer" to your "question". For years they've been doing this to a certain extent, they just didn't share how they interpreted your query.
  • 27 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    F
    Small progress is still progress. Kick management in the dick, friends.
  • Uploading The Human Mind Could Become a Reality, Expert Says

    Technology technology
    12
    1
    6 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    r3d4ct3d@midwest.socialR
    what mustard is best for the human body?
  • 1 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    L
    Where and what is texas?
  • *deleted by creator*

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet