Skip to content
linux-nerds.org

linux-nerds.org
  1. Übersicht
  2. Technology
  3. Your TV Is Spying On You

Your TV Is Spying On You

Technology
122 86 1.5k
Anmelden zum Antworten

  • G

    Reddit will block the Internet Archive

    Technology technology
    156
    1
    886 Stimmen
    156 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    U
    Yep. Voyager is way nicer. Good call friend
  • O

    OpenAI GPT-5 Backlash: Why Users Forced a Model’s Return

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    5 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • D

    OpenAI’s Sam Altman warns of AI voice fraud crisis in banking

    Technology technology
    55
    1
    239 Stimmen
    55 Beiträge
    662 Aufrufe
    T
    I'm not that gifted... in a lot of ways. lol
  • return2ozma@lemmy.worldR

    TikTok Is Reportedly Making a U.S. Version of the App

    Technology technology
    7
    1
    28 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    100 Aufrufe
    abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zoneA
    So basically doing what Western Tech companies do in China? Just sounds like a way to isolate American users and control what they see and hear...a bit like what they do in China...huh.
  • pro@programming.devP

    Large majority of French, German and Spanish public back tough EU stance on Big Tech, despite risk to Trump relations

    Technology technology
    19
    1
    431 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    263 Aufrufe
    M
    I think they meant 'because'
  • kernelle@0d.gsK

    Delivering BlogOnLemmy worldwide in record speeds

    Technology technology
    3
    28 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    48 Aufrufe
    kernelle@0d.gsK
    Nice to hear! I'm glad you enjoyed it.
  • fantawurstwasser@feddit.orgF

    Resurrecting a dead torrent tracker and finding 3 million peers

    Technology technology
    59
    321 Stimmen
    59 Beiträge
    626 Aufrufe
    I
    Yeah i suppose any form of payment that you have to keep secret for some reason is a reason to use crypto, though I struggle to imagine needing that if you're not doing something dodgy imagine you’re a YouTuber and want to accept donations: that will force you to give out your name to them, which they could use to get your address and phone number. There’s always someone that hates you, and I rather not have them knowing my personal info Wat. Crypto is not good at solving that, it's in fact much much worse than traditional payment methods. There's a reason scammers always want to be paid in crypto if you’re the seller then it’s a lot better. With the traditional banking system, with enough knowledge you can cheat both sides: stolen cards, abusive chargebacks, bank accounts in other countries under fake name/fake ID… Crypto simplifies scamming when the seller, and pretty much makes it impossible for buyers What specifically are you boycotting? Card payments, international tranfers, national transfers taking days to complete, money being seizable at all times many banks lose money on them Their plans are basically all focused on the card you get. Pretty sure they make money with it, else many wouldn’t offer cash back (selling infos and getting a fee from card payments?) if you think the people that benefit from you using crypto (crypto exchange owners and billionaires that own crypto etc.) are less evil than goverment regulated banks, you're deluded. Banks are evil anyways, does it really change anything? The difference is that it technically helps everyone using crypto, not only the rich. Plus P2P exchanges are a thing You'll spend more money using crypto for that, not less That’s just factually false. Do you know the price of a swift transfer? Now compare it to crypto tx fees, with many being under $0.01
  • deltawingdragon@sh.itjust.worksD

    Chrome using Gemini Nano for ‘Enhanced Protection’ against scams

    Technology technology
    8
    1
    1 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    81 Aufrufe
    L
    I think the principle could be applied to scan outside of the machine. It is making requests to 127.0.0.1:{port} - effectively using your computer as a "server" in a sort of reverse-SSRF attack. There's no reason it can't make requests to 10.10.10.1:{port} as well. Of course you'd need to guess the netmask of the network address range first, but this isn't that hard. In fact, if you consider that at least as far as the desktop site goes, most people will be browsing the web behind a standard consumer router left on defaults where it will be the first device in the DHCP range (e.g. 192.168.0.1 or 10.10.10.1), which tends to have a web UI on the LAN interface (port 8080, 80 or 443), then you'd only realistically need to scan a few addresses to determine the network address range. If you want to keep noise even lower, using just 192.168.0.1:80 and 192.168.1.1:80 I'd wager would cover 99% of consumer routers. From there you could assume that it's a /24 netmask and scan IPs to your heart's content. You could do top 10 most common ports type scans and go in-depth on anything you get a result on. I haven't tested this, but I don't see why it wouldn't work, when I was testing 13ft.io - a self-hosted 12ft.io paywall remover, an SSRF flaw like this absolutely let you perform any network request to any LAN address in range.