Skip to content

Senators Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Guarantee Military Right to Repair Its Equipment

Technology
53 37 0
  • Trump says US will start talks with China on TikTok deal this week

    Technology technology
    7
    56 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    37 Aufrufe
    L
    Walk me thru how the tariffs will work on that, will ya taco boy?
  • 437 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    58 Aufrufe
    mcasq_qsacj_234@lemmy.zipM
    Oh well, Apple its time to form an alliance with Microsoft to create the iOS Subsystem for Windows and the macOS Subsystem for Windows.
  • 111 Stimmen
    24 Beiträge
    81 Aufrufe
    O
    Ingesting all the artwork you ever created by obtaining it illegally and feeding it into my plagarism remix machine is theft of your work, because I did not pay for it. Separately, keeping a copy of this work so I can do this repeatedly is also stealing your work. The judge ruled the first was okay but the second was not because the first is "transformative", which sadly means to me that the judge despite best efforts does not understand how a weighted matrix of tokens works and that while they may have some prevention steps in place now, early models showed the tech for what it was as it regurgitated text with only minor differences in word choice here and there. Current models have layers on top to try and prevent this user input, but escaping those safeguards is common, and it's also only masking the fact that the entire model is built off of the theft of other's work.
  • Queer Dating Apps: Beware Who You Trust With Your Intimate Data

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    72 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 137 Stimmen
    41 Beiträge
    157 Aufrufe
    R
    And I think you swallowed one too many Apple ads.
  • 275 Stimmen
    68 Beiträge
    213 Aufrufe
    A
    intellectual property is grotesque. under no circumstances a creator should be barred from his creation. if shit like that happens I'd rather there not be any intellectual property at all
  • 1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 479 Stimmen
    81 Beiträge
    250 Aufrufe
    douglasg14b@lemmy.worldD
    Did I say that it did? No? Then why the rhetorical question for something that I never stated? Now that we're past that, I'm not sure if I think it's okay, but I at least recognize that it's normalized within society. And has been for like 70+ years now. The problem happens with how the data is used, and particularly abused. If you walk into my store, you expect that I am monitoring you. You expect that you are on camera and that your shopping patterns, like all foot traffic, are probably being analyzed and aggregated. What you buy is tracked, at least in aggregate, by default really, that's just volume tracking and prediction. Suffice to say that broad customer behavior analysis has been a thing for a couple generations now, at least. When you go to a website, why would you think that it is not keeping track of where you go and what you click on in the same manner? Now that I've stated that I do want to say that the real problems that we experience come in with how this data is misused out of what it's scope should be. And that we should have strong regulatory agencies forcing compliance of how this data is used and enforcing the right to privacy for people that want it removed.