Skip to content

Proton joins suit against Apple for predatory practices that harm developers and consumers

Technology
15 11 0
  • It's insane that it's taken this long for these companies to stand up to Apple. But better late than never, I guess. Here are my notes:

    Proton will donate any money we receive from the lawsuit to organizations fighting for democracy and human rights so that some portion of Apple’s profits made from countries with authoritarian regimes are redirected to freedom. These donations will be coordinated through the nonprofit Proton Foundation, which oversees Proton and ensures that our work always prioritizes the public good over financial gain.

    That's cool but, are they donating to the Proton Foundation or From the Proton foundation?

    Apple’s App Store policies disproportionately favor the surveillance capitalism business model employed by companies like Meta and Google...Companies that monetize user data in exchange for “free” services that abuse your privacy aren’t affected by this, as they don’t process payments through the App Store

    Ehhh I dunno that I buy that one. Charge them 30% and they'll have no option but to pony up. They're not just going to close up shop. Also how would you even enforce such a charge? Just charge them 30% of all of their income?

    There have been numerous incidents where Apple has removed or censored apps at the behest of authoritarian governments, in order to continue profiting from those markets.

    Yeah, don't go throwing stones in glass houses there, Proton. It's not like you don't comply with authoritarian governments.

    Not supporting Apple’s payment system is also considered a violation, which can lead to threats to remove your app, as happened to Proton.

    Wow, now that I did not realize.

    Proton cannot even link to FAQ or customer support pages from its apps, as Apple believes it’s possible that users will then navigate from the support page to a pricing page and upgrade their accounts without paying Apple its fee.

    I didn't realize this either. It couldn't be more clear by this rule alone that these policies have absolutely nothing to do with "protecting consumers" and everything to do with being 100% sure they get their cut for the privilege of being used on Apple devices.

    Apple claims this fee is necessary to pay for the maintenance of the App Store, but evidence presented in the Epic Games v. Apple case indicated that Apple makes a 78% profit on App Store fees

    After looking into this claim, it seems to be provided by an "expert witness" hired by Epic, and his personal calculations based on files that aren't publicly available. Apple says “Epic’s experts calculations of the operating margins for the App Store are simply wrong and we look forward to refuting them in court.”. So while I would be unsurprised if they're accurate, I don't necessarily believe Epic either.

    Proton cannot even link to FAQ or customer support pages from its apps, as Apple believes it’s possible that users will then navigate from the support page to a pricing page and upgrade their accounts without paying Apple its fee.

    I didn't realize this either.

    Yeah, this also is why Apple has been so sluggish on PWAs (and why they won't allow third party browsers). There is literally nothing that can be done in an app that can't be done quicker and easier as a PWA these days. But how is Apple going to make any money if you can publish your own app and take your own payments? They would then become a hardware vendor and that would absolutely ruin them as a company.

    Apple will throw everything they've got at this to attempt to maintain the status quo.

  • Proton cannot even link to FAQ or customer support pages from its apps, as Apple believes it’s possible that users will then navigate from the support page to a pricing page and upgrade their accounts without paying Apple its fee.

    I didn't realize this either.

    Yeah, this also is why Apple has been so sluggish on PWAs (and why they won't allow third party browsers). There is literally nothing that can be done in an app that can't be done quicker and easier as a PWA these days. But how is Apple going to make any money if you can publish your own app and take your own payments? They would then become a hardware vendor and that would absolutely ruin them as a company.

    Apple will throw everything they've got at this to attempt to maintain the status quo.

    There is literally nothing that can be done in an app that can't be done quicker and easier as a PWA these days

    Hard disagree. I am on Android so I'm not sure if that makes a difference.

    They would then become a hardware vendor and that would absolutely ruin them

    I hope that's a joke. Airpods could be a Fortune 500 company all on their own.

  • Also Andy Yen :

    I know it's quite irrelevant but I'm still very very cautious about proton since this comment. If at the head of the proton foundation you have a Trumpist it doesn't bod well for the future.

    CEO of proton think Trump of all things is what we need to combat the big tech. Trump, elected with a bunch of his big tech billionaires.

    My read on this is that he's an idiot who wanted to air a contrarian opinion ('cause that's how tech CEOs be), and focused in on a very literal/pedantic view of the issue without taking into account the context (which is that the Trump regime is facist and also just... lies, like, all the time).

    Whether or not being a pedantic idiot is better or worse than being a Trumpist (or if it's even a meaningful difference) is up to you, of course.

  • Also Andy Yen :

    I know it's quite irrelevant but I'm still very very cautious about proton since this comment. If at the head of the proton foundation you have a Trumpist it doesn't bod well for the future.

    CEO of proton think Trump of all things is what we need to combat the big tech. Trump, elected with a bunch of his big tech billionaires.

    I've seen people dismiss this as purely praise for Slater (about whom I know nothing), but it's very hard not to read these statements from the tweet:

    Great pick by @realDonaldTrump.

    He likes that Gail Slater was given a prominent role. Fair enough – the ping of Trump's account seems pandering, but it's not exactly a million-dollar donation to his inauguration.

    10 years ago, Republicans were the party of big business and Dems stood for the little guys, but today the tables have completely turned.

    Implies Republicans look to promote small businesses against tech monopolies. Demonstrably not the case.

    People forget that the current antitrust actions against Big Tech were started under the first Trump admin.

    Suggests the Trump Admin are the bastions against Silicon Valley giants. Completely laughable.

  • There is literally nothing that can be done in an app that can't be done quicker and easier as a PWA these days

    Hard disagree. I am on Android so I'm not sure if that makes a difference.

    They would then become a hardware vendor and that would absolutely ruin them

    I hope that's a joke. Airpods could be a Fortune 500 company all on their own.

    I hope that's a joke. Airpods could be a Fortune 500 company all on their own.

    No, I was serious, although after looking into it, I am surprised that hardware makes up 72% of their income. Perhaps they could make up the 28% software revenue shortfall with innovative new hardware and still maintain that 3.06T market cap, eh?

  • I've seen people dismiss this as purely praise for Slater (about whom I know nothing), but it's very hard not to read these statements from the tweet:

    Great pick by @realDonaldTrump.

    He likes that Gail Slater was given a prominent role. Fair enough – the ping of Trump's account seems pandering, but it's not exactly a million-dollar donation to his inauguration.

    10 years ago, Republicans were the party of big business and Dems stood for the little guys, but today the tables have completely turned.

    Implies Republicans look to promote small businesses against tech monopolies. Demonstrably not the case.

    People forget that the current antitrust actions against Big Tech were started under the first Trump admin.

    Suggests the Trump Admin are the bastions against Silicon Valley giants. Completely laughable.

    Slater became the vice-president for legal and regulatory policy for the Internet Association lobby group. Which was founded by “small business” like Google, Amazon, eBay and Facebook.

    And involved in trying to infringe upon privacy rights. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/09/lawmakers-must-not-let-internet-association-weaken-california-consumer-privacy-act
    So yeah, was weird and suspicious he omitted that when trying to use her to praise trump and sell her as some champion against big corporations.

    Then that anonymous medium article that floated around defending Andy completely omitting her involvement with the lobby group for big tech, and just focusing on how he isn't a racist back then seems like it was written by Andy himself haha.

  • Slater became the vice-president for legal and regulatory policy for the Internet Association lobby group. Which was founded by “small business” like Google, Amazon, eBay and Facebook.

    And involved in trying to infringe upon privacy rights. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/09/lawmakers-must-not-let-internet-association-weaken-california-consumer-privacy-act
    So yeah, was weird and suspicious he omitted that when trying to use her to praise trump and sell her as some champion against big corporations.

    Then that anonymous medium article that floated around defending Andy completely omitting her involvement with the lobby group for big tech, and just focusing on how he isn't a racist back then seems like it was written by Andy himself haha.

    Maybe he just has a crush on her aha.

  • I hope that's a joke. Airpods could be a Fortune 500 company all on their own.

    No, I was serious, although after looking into it, I am surprised that hardware makes up 72% of their income. Perhaps they could make up the 28% software revenue shortfall with innovative new hardware and still maintain that 3.06T market cap, eh?

    I mean they could do away with Apple Store fees altogether and still be unfathomably profitable.

  • Maybe he just has a crush on her aha.

    That would make the most sense haha

  • Earlier today, Proton filed court papers in the US District Court for the Northern District of California to join an existing class-action lawsuit against Apple. Proton is a plaintiff in the case, but we are representing and suing on behalf of a class of similarly situated developers. Challenging one of the most powerful corporations in the history of capitalism is not a decision we make lightly, but Proton has long championed online freedom, privacy, and security, and we believe this action is necessary to ensure the internet of the future lives up to its potential.

    Oh well, Apple its time to form an alliance with Microsoft to create the iOS Subsystem for Windows and the macOS Subsystem for Windows.

  • Firefox 140 Brings Tab Unload, Custom Search & New ESR

    Technology technology
    41
    1
    234 Stimmen
    41 Beiträge
    26 Aufrufe
    S
    Read again. I quoted something along the lines of "just as much a development decision as a marketing one" and I said, it wasn't a development decision, so what's left? Firefox released just as frequently before, just that they didn’t increase the major version that often. This does not appear to be true. Why don't you take a look at the version history instead of some marketing blog post? https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/releases/ Version 2 had 20 releases within 730 days, averaging one release every 36.5 days. Version 3 had 19 releases within 622 days, averaging 32.7 days per release. But these releases were unscheduled, so they were released when they were done. Now they are on a fixed 90-day schedule, no matter if anything worthwhile was complete or not, plus hotfix releases whenever they are necessary. That's not faster, but instead scheduled, and also they are incrementing the major version even if no major change was included. That's what the blog post was alluding to. In the before times, a major version number increase indicated major changes. Now it doesn't anymore, which means sysadmins still need to consider each release a major release, even if it doesn't contain major changes because it might contain them and the version name doesn't say anything about whether it does or not. It's nothing but a marketing change, moving from "version numbering means something" to "big number go up".
  • Your smartphone is a parasite, according to evolution

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    5 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 779 Stimmen
    395 Beiträge
    221 Aufrufe
    M
    The other is offensive yes.
  • Matrix.org is Introducing Premium Accounts

    Technology technology
    110
    1
    225 Stimmen
    110 Beiträge
    60 Aufrufe
    F
    It's nice that this exists, but even for this I'd prefer to use an open source tool. And it of course helps with migration only if the old HS is still online.. I think most practically this migration function would be built inside some Matrix client (one that would support more than one server to start with), but I suppose a standalone tool would be a decent solution as well.
  • Forced E-Waste PCs And The Case Of Windows 11’s Trusted Platform

    Technology technology
    116
    1
    317 Stimmen
    116 Beiträge
    60 Aufrufe
    K
    I was pretty lucky in university as most of my profs were either using cross platform stuff or Linux exclusive software. I had a single class that wanted me using windows stuff and I just dropped that one. Awesome that you're getting back into it, it's definitely the best it's ever been (and you're right that Steam cracked the code). It sounds like you probably know what you're doing if you're running Linux VMs and stuff, but feel free to shoot me a PM if you run into any questions or issues I might be able to point you in the right direction for.
  • 148 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    7 Aufrufe
    L
    Whenever these things come up you always hear "then the company won't survive!" CEO and managers make bank somehow but it doesn't matter that the workers can't live on that wage. It's always so weird how when workers actually take a pay cut, that the businesses get used to it. When the CEOs get bonuses they have to get used to that too.
  • Everyone Is Cheating Their Way Through College

    Technology technology
    23
    1
    170 Stimmen
    23 Beiträge
    31 Aufrufe
    L
    i can this for essay writing, prior to AI people would use prompts and templates of the same exact subject and work from there. and we hear the ODD situation where someone hired another person to do all the writing for them all the way to grad school( this is just as bad as chatgpt) you will get caught in grad school or during your job interview. might be different for specific questions in stem where the answer is more abstract,
  • 12 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    C
    Sure, he wasn't an engineer, so no, Jobs never personally "invented" anything. But Jobs at least knew what was good and what was shit when he saw it. Under Tim Cook, Apple just keeps putting out shitty unimaginative products, Cook is allowing Apple to stagnate, a dangerous thing to do when they have under 10% market share.