Skip to content

Senators Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Guarantee Military Right to Repair Its Equipment

Technology
38 28 0
  • 184 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    37 Aufrufe
    G
    i used to work for secretary of state police and driver privacy was taken deathly seriously. glad to see alexi’s keeping up the good work.
  • 209 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    49 Aufrufe
    K
    And yet so many people still refusing to switch to Signal, even tho Whatsapp is officially declared unsave by the government.
  • 18 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Matrix.org is Introducing Premium Accounts

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Welcome to the web we lost

    Technology technology
    22
    1
    182 Stimmen
    22 Beiträge
    89 Aufrufe
    C
    Is it though? Its always far easier to be loud and obnoxious than do something constructive, even with the internet and LLMs, in fact those things are amplifiers which if anything make the attention imbalance even more drastic and unrepresentative of actual human behaviour. In the time it takes me to write this comment some troll can write a dozen hateful ones, or a bot can write a thousand. Doesn't mean humans are shitty in a 1000/1 ratio, just means shitty people can now be a thousand times louder.
  • 92 Stimmen
    42 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    G
    You don’t understand. The tracking and spying is the entire point of the maneuver. The ‘children are accessing porn’ thing is just a Trojan horse to justify the spying. I understand what are you saying, I simply don't consider to check if a law is applied as a Trojan horse in itself. I would agree if the EU had said to these sites "give us all the the access log, a list of your subscriber, every data you gather and a list of every IP it ever connected to your site", and even this way does not imply that with only the IP you could know who the user is without even asking the telecom company for help. So, is it a Trojan horse ? Maybe, it heavily depend on how the EU want to do it. If they just ask "show me how you try to avoid that a minor access your material", which normally is the fist step, I don't see how it could be a Trojan horse. It could become, I agree on that. As you pointed out, it’s already illegal for them to access it, and parents are legally required to prevent their children from accessing it. No, parents are not legally required to prevent it. The seller (or provider) is legally required. It is a subtle but important difference. But you don’t lock down the entire population, or institute pre-crime surveillance policies, just because some parents are not going to follow the law. True. You simply impose laws that make mandatories for the provider to check if he can sell/serve something to someone. I mean asking that the cashier of mall check if I am an adult when I buy a bottle of wine is no different than asking to Pornhub to check if the viewer is an adult. I agree that in one case is really simple and in the other is really hard (and it is becoming harder by the day). You then charge the guilty parents after the offense. Ok, it would work, but then how do you caught the offendind parents if not checking what everyone do ? Is it not simpler to try to prevent it instead ?
  • 1 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    56 Aufrufe
    G
    I’m in the EU and PII definitely IS “a thing” here, Then let me be more clear: It is not a thing in EU law. With due respect, the level of intellectual functioning, in this case reading comprehension, you display is incompatible with being an IT professional in any country. If you are not trolling, then you should consult a physician.
  • The mystery of $MELANIA

    Technology technology
    13
    1
    25 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    46 Aufrufe
    geekwithsoul@lemm.eeG
    Archive