Here's your first look at the rebooted Digg | TechCrunch
-
this would-be Reddit competitor, built for the AI era
Oh no...
The founders think that the internet is being flooded with bots and AI agents, which will create demand for online communities like Digg that foster real human connections.
Okay, Digg has my cautious attention...
Beneath posts, Digg is leveraging AI to summarize the article’s content.
And they lost me.
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 00:33 zuletzt editiert von -
Idk, its less subjective than the top comment summaries on reddit from users
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 00:34 zuletzt editiert vonNot like itll prevent ppl from clicking on articles that alrady werent
-
not quite sure it’s not starting out enshittified
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 00:34 zuletzt editiert vonyeah it doesnt look bad at all, thatll prob come later, the ai in use right now are a nonissue imo
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 00:36 zuletzt editiert von
Worthless crap. Thank fuck we're on a platform free of centralised ownership.
-
Idk, its less subjective than the top comment summaries on reddit from users
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 00:38 zuletzt editiert vonI see no reason to engage with, or trust anything created by, a bullshit generator. If Digg claims to "care" about the humans, then making the top comment into a brick wall (which has zero accountability) is a funny way of showing it.
But then again, I'm sure their privacy policy also says they care about your privacy.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 01:09 zuletzt editiert von
Maybe if they allow API access for alternative frontends that eliminate ads and block telemetry. Otherwise, not interested.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 01:12 zuletzt editiert von
let me guess it's ai slop
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 01:12 zuletzt editiert von
I'm looking forward to the "Here's your first look at the rebooted Reddit" articles in 7 years.
-
Maybe if they allow API access for alternative frontends that eliminate ads and block telemetry. Otherwise, not interested.
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 01:23 zuletzt editiert vonSo basically you want Digg to undo the things that made us all move from Digg to Reddit?
-
Idk, its less subjective than the top comment summaries on reddit from users
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 02:08 zuletzt editiert vonIs there some reason we want brands to join the conversation?
-
So basically you want Digg to undo the things that made us all move from Digg to Reddit?
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 02:09 zuletzt editiert vonshrugs in Mbin
-
shrugs in Mbin
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 02:10 zuletzt editiert vonnods enthusiastically in Mbin
-
yeah it doesnt look bad at all, thatll prob come later, the ai in use right now are a nonissue imo
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 02:43 zuletzt editiert von lwd@lemm.eedeleted by creator
-
this would-be Reddit competitor, built for the AI era
Oh no...
The founders think that the internet is being flooded with bots and AI agents, which will create demand for online communities like Digg that foster real human connections.
Okay, Digg has my cautious attention...
Beneath posts, Digg is leveraging AI to summarize the article’s content.
And they lost me.
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 02:49 zuletzt editiert vonBecause if there's anything a link aggregator needs, it's MORE reasons for people to not read linked articles! Will they also add AI responses? That way users wouldn't need to bother with reading OR writing!
-
Is there some reason we want brands to join the conversation?
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 03:11 zuletzt editiert vonThey
foster
real
human
connections.
-
this would-be Reddit competitor, built for the AI era
Oh no...
The founders think that the internet is being flooded with bots and AI agents, which will create demand for online communities like Digg that foster real human connections.
Okay, Digg has my cautious attention...
Beneath posts, Digg is leveraging AI to summarize the article’s content.
And they lost me.
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 04:06 zuletzt editiert vonIt must be tiring to be this narrow-minded.
-
I see no reason to engage with, or trust anything created by, a bullshit generator. If Digg claims to "care" about the humans, then making the top comment into a brick wall (which has zero accountability) is a funny way of showing it.
But then again, I'm sure their privacy policy also says they care about your privacy.
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 05:37 zuletzt editiert vonits not a comment its in the post and its alpha, they'll prob add an option for it to be closed by default.
-
deleted by creator
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 05:39 zuletzt editiert vonTrue, but its a tiny summary one sentence, im less likely to click the link when I see the fat human written summary at the top of reddit comments
-
this would-be Reddit competitor, built for the AI era
Oh no...
The founders think that the internet is being flooded with bots and AI agents, which will create demand for online communities like Digg that foster real human connections.
Okay, Digg has my cautious attention...
Beneath posts, Digg is leveraging AI to summarize the article’s content.
And they lost me.
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 07:55 zuletzt editiert vonWhat's wrong with AI summaries? AI has it's uses. A long as it's just adding some metadata I don't see nothing wrong with it.
For me the big questions is what are they going to do to stop bots, spam and internet points farming. So far they didn't reveal any plans.
-
this would-be Reddit competitor, built for the AI era
Oh no...
The founders think that the internet is being flooded with bots and AI agents, which will create demand for online communities like Digg that foster real human connections.
Okay, Digg has my cautious attention...
Beneath posts, Digg is leveraging AI to summarize the article’s content.
And they lost me.
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 08:38 zuletzt editiert vonAI. BOTS. MILLENIAL INFANTILE DESIGN. CORPORATE SPEAK.
Gee, I wonder why people aren't tripping over themselves to join this.