Skip to content

Delta moves toward eliminating set prices in favor of AI that determines how much you personally will pay for a ticket

Technology
220 156 487
  • Meta Takes Hard Line Against Europe's AI Rules

    Technology technology
    19
    1
    92 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    53 Aufrufe
    F
    One part of this is jurisdiction. I'm being very simplistic here and only have a vague sense of the picture, really (my own prejudice - I find just about everything about meta abhorrent) They are based in a country that's solely oritentated towards liberty - not fairness or common sense. There are other parts, of course, like lobbying, tax breaks and so on, but a big part is because they're not based in the EU.
  • 1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    13 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 50 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    56 Aufrufe
    H
    Also fair
  • 99 Stimmen
    48 Beiträge
    212 Aufrufe
    Y
    enable the absolute worst of what humanity has to offer. can we call it a reality check? we think of humans as so great and important and unique for quite a while now while the world is spiraling downwards. maybe humans arent so great after all. like what is art? ppl vibe with slob music but birds cant vote. how does that make sense? if one can watch AI slob (and we all will with the constant improvements in ai) and like it, well maybe our taste of art is not any better than what a bird can do and like. i hope LLM will lead to a breakthrough in understanding what type of animal we really are.
  • 462 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    417 Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.
  • YouTube tops Disney and Netflix in TV viewing

    Technology technology
    96
    1
    215 Stimmen
    96 Beiträge
    339 Aufrufe
    C
    "Not Interested" is just free data for them to fill out your account's advertising profile.
  • 2 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    52 Aufrufe
    F
    IMO stuff like that is why a good trainer is important. IMO it's stronger evidence that proper user-centered design should be done and a usable and intuitive UX and set of APIs developed. But because the buyer of this heap of shit is some C-level, there is no incentive to actually make it usable for the unfortunate peons who are forced to interact with it. See also SFDC and every ERP solution in existence.
  • 0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    23 Aufrufe
    P
    It's a shame. AI has potential but most people just want to exploit its development for their own gain.