Skip to content

Community Notes vanishes from X feeds, raising 'serious questions' amid ongoing EU probe

Technology
94 47 1.6k
  • More educated than you, I can almost guarantee :). Some people call me Doctor, though I think that should be reserved for science and medicine. What’s yours btw? Degree in gender studies or arts? The lefts obsession with calling everyone they disagree with “uneducated” is so pathetic.

    What are you talking about with regards to the contents of the ads? The “issue” that some people pretend to have is that they don’t think ads should be shown near content they deem hateful. It’s not the contents of the ads that people complain about. As for that complaint, only dimwit sees an ad and instantly thinks that the company the ad is for supports whatever views are shared in the same vicinity of it. In reality it was just a way for the left to try and guilt advertisers into leaving Twitter because they were upset that Elon ruined their safe space.

    Some people call me Doctor,

    Oh really? I can almost always tell because it's obvious in breath, depth and consideration shown in of the replies.

    The “issue” that some people pretend to have is that they don’t think ads should be shown near content they deem hateful.

    I sincerely can't believe that someone who claims to be on par with a doctor doesn't even entertain the possibility that the content of an ad could be problematic on a sociological level. And that's on top of misconstruing the point I was making.

    The “issue” that some people pretend to have is that they don’t think ads should be shown near content they deem hateful

    You mean the advertisers of big corporations who care about their brand image don't like that, right doctor?

  • Some people call me Doctor,

    Oh really? I can almost always tell because it's obvious in breath, depth and consideration shown in of the replies.

    The “issue” that some people pretend to have is that they don’t think ads should be shown near content they deem hateful.

    I sincerely can't believe that someone who claims to be on par with a doctor doesn't even entertain the possibility that the content of an ad could be problematic on a sociological level. And that's on top of misconstruing the point I was making.

    The “issue” that some people pretend to have is that they don’t think ads should be shown near content they deem hateful

    You mean the advertisers of big corporations who care about their brand image don't like that, right doctor?

    I sincerely can’t believe that someone who claims to be on par with a doctor doesn’t even entertain the possibility that the content of an ad could be problematic on a sociological level. And that’s on top of misconstruing the point I was making.

    Do you think that that article you linked is saying that the content of the ads are "hateful" or "problematic"? That's not what it's talking about. It's talking about showing normal ads near "hateful" content.

    You mean the advertisers of big corporations who care about their brand image don’t like that, right doctor?

    They only care when a bunch of idiots pretend that having an ad in the vicinity of something they don't like means that the brand supports the thing they don't like. They don't actually care, they just pretended to so they could essentially blackmail companies into pulling advertising dollars from Twitter so they could try and harm twitter.

    Did you not realise that? Did you really think that it was just a coincidence that all of a sudden it became some giant issue just as elon musk bought Twitter?

    Oh really? I can almost always tell because it’s obvious in breath, depth and consideration shown in of the replies.
    ...
    right doctor?

    Love it - when you try to make fun of me when you think I'm "uneducated" and it falls flat on its face because I'm more educated than you, you then try to make fun of me for being more educated than you lol. Amazing.

    You also didn't answer my question, while I answered yours. That's not very nice. What is your highest level of education and, if it was higher than high school, what was the area/qualification?

  • I sincerely can’t believe that someone who claims to be on par with a doctor doesn’t even entertain the possibility that the content of an ad could be problematic on a sociological level. And that’s on top of misconstruing the point I was making.

    Do you think that that article you linked is saying that the content of the ads are "hateful" or "problematic"? That's not what it's talking about. It's talking about showing normal ads near "hateful" content.

    You mean the advertisers of big corporations who care about their brand image don’t like that, right doctor?

    They only care when a bunch of idiots pretend that having an ad in the vicinity of something they don't like means that the brand supports the thing they don't like. They don't actually care, they just pretended to so they could essentially blackmail companies into pulling advertising dollars from Twitter so they could try and harm twitter.

    Did you not realise that? Did you really think that it was just a coincidence that all of a sudden it became some giant issue just as elon musk bought Twitter?

    Oh really? I can almost always tell because it’s obvious in breath, depth and consideration shown in of the replies.
    ...
    right doctor?

    Love it - when you try to make fun of me when you think I'm "uneducated" and it falls flat on its face because I'm more educated than you, you then try to make fun of me for being more educated than you lol. Amazing.

    You also didn't answer my question, while I answered yours. That's not very nice. What is your highest level of education and, if it was higher than high school, what was the area/qualification?

    They only care when a bunch of idiots pretend that having an ad in the vicinity of something they don’t like

    Studies indicate a link between the ad and its emotionally charged context to viewers. [1] [2] I know that Musk claimed that several times, almost verbatim as you said it, but it's not exactly true. And I also know because I've had that visceral reaction to an ad being 'misplaced'. I don't think it's an empty claim at all, and the company has every right to decide where to show their ads and why.

    Did you not realise that? Did you really think that it was just a coincidence that all of a sudden it became some giant issue just as elon musk bought Twitter?

    Like how Elon made it a huge deal himself by publicly telling companies to 'go fuck yourself' if they didn't like it his way?

    you then try to make fun of me for being more educated than you lol. Amazing

    Nope, this is not a pissing contest. This is a can-you-piss test because I think your takes don't reflect your level of education. I can count at least two that I find quite baffling, so I had to ask.

  • They only care when a bunch of idiots pretend that having an ad in the vicinity of something they don’t like

    Studies indicate a link between the ad and its emotionally charged context to viewers. [1] [2] I know that Musk claimed that several times, almost verbatim as you said it, but it's not exactly true. And I also know because I've had that visceral reaction to an ad being 'misplaced'. I don't think it's an empty claim at all, and the company has every right to decide where to show their ads and why.

    Did you not realise that? Did you really think that it was just a coincidence that all of a sudden it became some giant issue just as elon musk bought Twitter?

    Like how Elon made it a huge deal himself by publicly telling companies to 'go fuck yourself' if they didn't like it his way?

    you then try to make fun of me for being more educated than you lol. Amazing

    Nope, this is not a pissing contest. This is a can-you-piss test because I think your takes don't reflect your level of education. I can count at least two that I find quite baffling, so I had to ask.

    Studies can be - and often are - made to show anything. Having family members who work in the research industry I know for a fact, because they would often get approached to do a study to get a particular result. If they refuse, someone who needs the money will gladly do it. It's the same way that any lawyer can find an "expert" to support their desired position in court.

    Like how Elon made it a huge deal himself by publicly telling companies to ‘go fuck yourself’ if they didn’t like it his way?

    My point was that no one cared about where their ads showed on Twitter until Elon bought it, and then all of a sudden it was this major issue. It was performative and it was being used to try to blackmail them, that's why he said what he said.

    Nope, this is not a pissing contest.

    It was when you thought you could piss higher and further than me ;). Funny that. I find your takes baffling, so I'm asking - what is your level of education?

  • Studies can be - and often are - made to show anything. Having family members who work in the research industry I know for a fact, because they would often get approached to do a study to get a particular result. If they refuse, someone who needs the money will gladly do it. It's the same way that any lawyer can find an "expert" to support their desired position in court.

    Like how Elon made it a huge deal himself by publicly telling companies to ‘go fuck yourself’ if they didn’t like it his way?

    My point was that no one cared about where their ads showed on Twitter until Elon bought it, and then all of a sudden it was this major issue. It was performative and it was being used to try to blackmail them, that's why he said what he said.

    Nope, this is not a pissing contest.

    It was when you thought you could piss higher and further than me ;). Funny that. I find your takes baffling, so I'm asking - what is your level of education?

    If you think there's fraud, then show it. You seem to know your way around.

    My point was that no one cared about where their ads showed on Twitter until Elon bought it, and then all of a sudden it was this major issue. It was performative and it was being used to try to blackmail them, that's why he said what he said.

    Elon immediately fired the content moderating team. The racist hash tags showed up and then Elmo defended them and told advertisers to go fuck themselves if they disagreed. Why are you dead-set about blaming the media? Lol

    It was when you thought you could piss higher

    Bruh. Lol I made my point, and I still don't hear anything reasonable from you to correct that. You sure it's on me to talk that big and walk so small? What was that you said about cisgender again?

  • If you still use twitter (no, asshole, you don't get to own a letter of the alphabet - fuck off) then you are part of the problem.

    I prefer to call it Xitter, with the X pronounced the Chinese way

  • This post did not contain any content.

    Eu please put up or shut up. Either hold X accountable, or just say they are big to regulate and can do whatever

  • It such a large network and great at blasting information out. Lots of youtuber/livestreamers still have to eXcrete on x or less they loose their audience. And it's not just video, writers also depends on the big ole X megaphone to aunuce book releases, beta reader applications etc etc.

    Honestly furry artists are probably the freest from X since they have so many of their own social media sites.

    You X following even is part of the reason for publishers to pick up your book.

    Add to that some police departments actually use to send amber alerts.

    You just have the world's largest public megaphone in an attention based economy. People can't leave for anything smaller.

  • For those people they should all contact the government agencies that are still on Twitter and demand they switch to Bluesky.

    Or self host a mastodon server.

  • It such a large network and great at blasting information out. Lots of youtuber/livestreamers still have to eXcrete on x or less they loose their audience. And it's not just video, writers also depends on the big ole X megaphone to aunuce book releases, beta reader applications etc etc.

    Honestly furry artists are probably the freest from X since they have so many of their own social media sites.

    You X following even is part of the reason for publishers to pick up your book.

    Add to that some police departments actually use to send amber alerts.

    You just have the world's largest public megaphone in an attention based economy. People can't leave for anything smaller.

    Great points, except:

    People can’t leave for anything smaller.

    They can and some do. It’s still a choice.

  • Or mastodon.

    Been using Mastodon for about two years now and never going back.

  • Because Twitter is the only social media site that isn’t a highly censored echo chamber.

    Since Musk took over, the censorship requests went from 50% accepted to 80% accepted.

  • This post did not contain any content.

    elon has never liked community notes; they were just a holdover from old twitter and he's been desperate to get rid of it.

  • I'd rather "trust" a company that cuts the bullshit with notices like

    The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
    Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.

    to remind the user that trusting noncredible information from unreliable sources is a ridiculous concept.

    So, 4chan. You want Twitter to be 4chan.

  • Since Musk took over, the censorship requests went from 50% accepted to 80% accepted.

    How do you know this?

  • If you think there's fraud, then show it. You seem to know your way around.

    My point was that no one cared about where their ads showed on Twitter until Elon bought it, and then all of a sudden it was this major issue. It was performative and it was being used to try to blackmail them, that's why he said what he said.

    Elon immediately fired the content moderating team. The racist hash tags showed up and then Elmo defended them and told advertisers to go fuck themselves if they disagreed. Why are you dead-set about blaming the media? Lol

    It was when you thought you could piss higher

    Bruh. Lol I made my point, and I still don't hear anything reasonable from you to correct that. You sure it's on me to talk that big and walk so small? What was that you said about cisgender again?

    Education level when?

  • I prefer to call it Xitter, with the X pronounced the Chinese way

    Yep, this should be standard practice.

    And we can call individual messages Xits.

  • Education level when?

    I mean, your reasonable takes when, mr doctor? I love how you latched onto the pissing bit instead of matching your statements and priorities to your claimed level of education. If you claim to walk, then walk. You claim to run, so let's see it.

    Oh, and I still need evidence of fraud for the studies (not to be confused with how long you claim your dick to be, in case you get fixated on another stupid pissing contest to conveniently divert from the topic).

  • Great points, except:

    People can’t leave for anything smaller.

    They can and some do. It’s still a choice.

    technically yes but if leaving means you loose half your income then is it really a choice.

  • technically yes but if leaving means you loose half your income then is it really a choice.

    Of course, but it needn’t be black and white. You can also diversify, make yourself less reliant on a single platform. And by doing so, enable your audience to follow you elsewhere. Or diversify into different activities altogether. And when it’s no longer half your income on the line, then switch.

    But doing nothing and saying, “but half my income!”? That’s not only a choice, but also complacency.

  • DM me on Spotify: Spotify launches a messaging feature.

    Technology technology
    134
    1
    217 Stimmen
    134 Beiträge
    5 Aufrufe
    F
    Just did a couple of tests and Qobuz seems to play gaplessly on my phone.
  • 26 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    13 Aufrufe
    B
    ah, so this is the real reason why hbo rebranded !/s!<
  • OpenAI GPT-5 Backlash: Why Users Forced a Model’s Return

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    5 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 34 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    63 Aufrufe
    O
    She didn’t call herself a libertarian and explicitly said she isn’t And North Korea calls its self democratic. Yet we don't call it a democracy. No, we define these categories by what they are/do/believe in/etc... and like it or not, Ayn Rand's Objectivism is 100% a component of libertarian ideology, Ayn Rand's beliefs are very much a core component of Libertarianism, and i'm sorry to inform you that many on that list of yours ARE libertarians, such as Milei. In the same way the Marx&Hegel were a cornerstone of communism. But you are correct about Zelenskyy, he is not libertarian. Bullshit. You might also want to think who’s “we” and what externalia does giving that “we” an ability to “put limits on these things” possess. Standard Libertarian response that basically ignores the existence of anything outside the individual Also, from the person who you believe isn't a Libertarian: The source of the government's authority is "the consent of the governed." This means that the government is not the ruler, but the servant or agent of the citizens; it means that the government as such has no rights except the rights delegated to it by the citizens for a specific purpose. -Ayn Rand, Galt's Speech. A government is large scale organized violence and warlords. Spoken just like Rand herself! "Only a government holds that power. The nature of governmental action is: coercive action. The nature of political power is: the power to force obedience under threat of physical injury—the threat of property expropriation, imprisonment, or death." The Virtue of Selfishness "The Nature of Government," The Virtue of Selfishness, again Ayn Rand. Lastly, on privatization: https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257%2Fjep.20.3.187
  • 197 Stimmen
    31 Beiträge
    128 Aufrufe
    H
    Don't forget, burner phones still exist. You can handle everything in cash if you're smart. The phone isn't important, you just want a cheap sim with no tracks leading to you.
  • Anthem Demo - Napster plus Distributed Machine Learning

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    7 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    22 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Reddit will help advertisers turn ‘positive’ posts into ads

    Technology technology
    61
    1
    364 Stimmen
    61 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    noodlesreborn@lemmy.worldN
    Mmmmmm I love not being on Reddit
  • 32 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    85 Aufrufe
    J
    Apparently, it was required to be allowed in that state: Reading a bit more, during the sentencing phase in that state people making victim impact statements can choose their format for expression, and it's entirely allowed to make statements about what other people would say. So the judge didn't actually have grounds to deny it. No jury during that phase, so it's just the judge listening to free form requests in both directions. It's gross, but the rules very much allow the sister to make a statement about what she believes her brother would have wanted to say, in whatever format she wanted. From: https://sh.itjust.works/comment/18471175 influence the sentence From what I've seen, to be fair, judges' decisions have varied wildly regardless, sadly, and sentences should be more standardized. I wonder what it would've been otherwise.