What does it mean to ‘accept’ or ‘reject’ all cookies, and which should I choose?
-
This post did not contain any content.
What does it mean to ‘accept’ or ‘reject’ all cookies, and which should I choose?
Cookie consent pop-ups are annoying, but it’s worth understanding what you’re agreeing to.
The Conversation (theconversation.com)
schrieb am 19. Mai 2025, 09:23 zuletzt editiert vontl;dr: "Reject All" will not break the site.
Also, technically there's still a cookie after that:
The choice is recorded in a consent cookie
The article seems to ride on people's anxiety about walls of text & choices presented by various cookie popups (not all of which even have a "Reject all" option) and IMHO isn't quite clear enough that "Reject all" is the best option for 99% of use cases.
-
This post did not contain any content.
What does it mean to ‘accept’ or ‘reject’ all cookies, and which should I choose?
Cookie consent pop-ups are annoying, but it’s worth understanding what you’re agreeing to.
The Conversation (theconversation.com)
schrieb am 19. Mai 2025, 09:31 zuletzt editiert vonI generally reject all. Then check for those sneaky sites that keep "legitimate interest" cookies ticked. I really doubt their idea of legitimate and my idea of legitimate align in any way.
-
Not according to Cookie Monster! He accepts all cookies. Always.
schrieb am 19. Mai 2025, 09:58 zuletzt editiert vonIt’s good enough for me.
-
I generally reject all. Then check for those sneaky sites that keep "legitimate interest" cookies ticked. I really doubt their idea of legitimate and my idea of legitimate align in any way.
schrieb am 19. Mai 2025, 10:47 zuletzt editiert vonI have no idea how an ad servicing company I have never heard of could have a legitimate interest in my online activities.
-
This post did not contain any content.
What does it mean to ‘accept’ or ‘reject’ all cookies, and which should I choose?
Cookie consent pop-ups are annoying, but it’s worth understanding what you’re agreeing to.
The Conversation (theconversation.com)
schrieb am 19. Mai 2025, 11:40 zuletzt editiert vonHorrendous that this isn't just a browser setting that can be applied universally. It's 100% opt out every time.
-
I have no idea how an ad servicing company I have never heard of could have a legitimate interest in my online activities.
schrieb am 19. Mai 2025, 11:46 zuletzt editiert vonThey have an interest, but it isn't in your best interest.
-
Horrendous that this isn't just a browser setting that can be applied universally. It's 100% opt out every time.
schrieb am 19. Mai 2025, 12:31 zuletzt editiert vonUblock Origin has that option!
-
Horrendous that this isn't just a browser setting that can be applied universally. It's 100% opt out every time.
schrieb am 19. Mai 2025, 12:42 zuletzt editiert vonWell, it could have been but just like
robot.txt
everyone ignored the Do-not-track Header in HTTP requests. -
This post did not contain any content.
What does it mean to ‘accept’ or ‘reject’ all cookies, and which should I choose?
Cookie consent pop-ups are annoying, but it’s worth understanding what you’re agreeing to.
The Conversation (theconversation.com)
schrieb am 19. Mai 2025, 14:27 zuletzt editiert vonIf I'm given the option, I always choose to reject all. I don't know if the company behind it actually sees that or not, but it makes me feel better anyway.
-
schrieb am 19. Mai 2025, 14:44 zuletzt editiert von
It's kinda funny that they're "legitimate interest", as that infers that the other ones aren't legitmate.
-
tl;dr: "Reject All" will not break the site.
Also, technically there's still a cookie after that:
The choice is recorded in a consent cookie
The article seems to ride on people's anxiety about walls of text & choices presented by various cookie popups (not all of which even have a "Reject all" option) and IMHO isn't quite clear enough that "Reject all" is the best option for 99% of use cases.
schrieb am 19. Mai 2025, 14:47 zuletzt editiert von fundmecfsresearch@lemmy.blahaj.zoneMy flow is usually:
[when my cookie auto decline eztension doesn’t work]
- Look for Reject All button
- If no reject all button just open the site on an archive
-
Horrendous that this isn't just a browser setting that can be applied universally. It's 100% opt out every time.
schrieb am 19. Mai 2025, 16:50 zuletzt editiert vonhttps://github.com/cavi-au/Consent-O-Matic
This can do it for you on most sites in most browsers. -
https://github.com/cavi-au/Consent-O-Matic
This can do it for you on most sites in most browsers.schrieb am 19. Mai 2025, 17:25 zuletzt editiert vonI have it, and it does help, but it seems more often than not I still get a pop up for cookies.
-
https://github.com/cavi-au/Consent-O-Matic
This can do it for you on most sites in most browsers.schrieb am 19. Mai 2025, 17:36 zuletzt editiert vonThat's unnecessary. Not clicking anything is legally identical to opting out. So just install uBO and add the cookie list filter and block those annoying banners entirely.
-
Well, it could have been but just like
robot.txt
everyone ignored the Do-not-track Header in HTTP requests.schrieb am 19. Mai 2025, 17:41 zuletzt editiert vonThat's why I leave this off. Ironically the "Do Not Track" signal is used to more effectively track you.
-
I have it, and it does help, but it seems more often than not I still get a pop up for cookies.
schrieb am 19. Mai 2025, 18:29 zuletzt editiert vonYou can report websites that it failed to act upon in the extension window
-
If I'm given the option, I always choose to reject all. I don't know if the company behind it actually sees that or not, but it makes me feel better anyway.
schrieb am 19. Mai 2025, 18:39 zuletzt editiert vonIf the site doesnt work without cookies depends on how much I want to browse I will accept knowing that my browser nukes everything or I will just not browse that site.
-
This post did not contain any content.
What does it mean to ‘accept’ or ‘reject’ all cookies, and which should I choose?
Cookie consent pop-ups are annoying, but it’s worth understanding what you’re agreeing to.
The Conversation (theconversation.com)
schrieb am 19. Mai 2025, 18:58 zuletzt editiert vonI use uMatrix to control exactly which cookies I accept, and only accept what I need.
-
That's unnecessary. Not clicking anything is legally identical to opting out. So just install uBO and add the cookie list filter and block those annoying banners entirely.
schrieb am 19. Mai 2025, 19:44 zuletzt editiert vonYou're not wrong, but in my experience those lists cause some sites to not work anymore, the whole site will stay dark waiting for the cookie pop-up for example, or you can't scroll. I still use uBO to block ads but Consent-O-Matic gives me a better experience on those sites.
-
You're not wrong, but in my experience those lists cause some sites to not work anymore, the whole site will stay dark waiting for the cookie pop-up for example, or you can't scroll. I still use uBO to block ads but Consent-O-Matic gives me a better experience on those sites.
schrieb am 19. Mai 2025, 20:12 zuletzt editiert vonDid you try to dismiss then manually or use the filter list?
-
Using the video queue feature on YouTube mobile requires premium
Technology30 vor 4 Tagenvor 4 Tagen1
-
Distributed Spacecraft Autonomy could enable future satellite swarms to complete science goals with little human help
Technology30 vor 6 Tagenvor 6 Tagen1
-
Mastercard and Visa face backlash after hundreds of adult games removed from online stores Steam and Itch.io
Technology30 vor 12 Tagenvor 14 Tagen1
-
-
1
-
-
-
Microsoft and the CWA reach a tentative contract agreement for ~300 ZeniMax QA workers after two years of talks, marking Microsoft's first US union contract
Technology 1. Juni 2025, 09:461