Too late , Musky. Tim Apple laid the gold tribute at the feet of the orange idol, so now he gets to do whatever he wants.

Studies have shown we're pretty bad at detecting good AI stuff, regardless of how skilled we think we are. It's the crappy AI slop that makes everybody think they're Sherlock Holmes.

It’s another move to protect against AI scraping that isn't paying them for access.

woah. I really didn't know. I guess in that case it's also strange it didn't happen sooner

Who are those persistent proponents?

I'm gonna be ready this time, I can feel it. THIS will be the crisis from which I emerge on top. I switched to a bidet last year so there's no need to stockpile toilet paper. I've got all my tendies and match ammo in the basement ready to boogaloo, and I've got puts on SPY in the tube for when it starts to look shaky. No idea where this train is going but I'm full steam ahead and loaded for bear. A cocaine-bear.

The userbase does want to give them money though. I constantly hear people say that they want to donate to Firefox, but Mozilla doesn't let them do that. Also, I never said that Patreon would give them more money. It would be less money, but it would be more effective, as they could finally ditch the worthless exectutives that keep draining Mozilla's resources.

I said constitutional law, not the US constitution alone. Including declaration of independence and the surrounding history of discussion and all. Also not "says that people have", but recognizes it as an inherent right. Naturally if such a right exists, either no law can retract it or it would be meaningless. And then please show me how this right to rebellion was applied when an actual rebellion occured. I don't see how this is relevant. If you think it is, please explain how, explicitly and not implicitly. (Also one would guess that slaveholders' right to rebellion is in significant doubt.) And please also take into consideration any laws regarding treason or domestic terrorism. Can't override constitutional and inherent rights. Also if you don't recognize the latter, it's too bad but your country's founding documents do as a basis. Basically the US constitution is toilet paper compared to unstated but mentioned in d.o.i. inherent rights, and any normal law is toilet paper compared to the US constitution. And people who made that system were very well educated, also very practical, and explained very thoroughly why should any system of formal rules be possible to discard by force and why inherent rights not prone to degeneracy of any formal system driven by power should exist in philosophy. They were not XX and XXI centuries' idealists with overvalued ideas, or idiots dreaming of totalitarianism with those like them on top.