An analysis of X(Twitter)'s new XChat features shows that X can probably decrypt users' messages, as it holds users' private keys on its servers
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 10. Juni 2025, 11:20 zuletzt editiert von
That's not "probably". If they have the key they straight up have access. The key to my house can't just probably unlock the door.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 10. Juni 2025, 11:44 zuletzt editiert von
I'm surprised nobody posted the surprised_pikachu.gif yet.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 10. Juni 2025, 13:14 zuletzt editiert von
They control all the endpoints/clients so even if they didnt, they could change it at any moment as the code isnt open...
-
That's not "probably". If they have the key they straight up have access. The key to my house can't just probably unlock the door.
schrieb am 10. Juni 2025, 13:43 zuletzt editiert vonseriously, that's the most convoluted wording possible for a simple statement. If they have the private keys they have the private keys and there's no need for analysis.
-
Which effectively means the messages aren't encrypted. Cool.
schrieb am 10. Juni 2025, 13:51 zuletzt editiert vonIt also effectively means they are reading those messages.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 10. Juni 2025, 14:01 zuletzt editiert von
Xchat is an irc client though.
-
Xchat is an irc client though.
schrieb am 10. Juni 2025, 14:34 zuletzt editiert vonThe one true XChat
-
seriously, that's the most convoluted wording possible for a simple statement. If they have the private keys they have the private keys and there's no need for analysis.
schrieb am 10. Juni 2025, 14:50 zuletzt editiert vonWeird, I didn't see 'probably' once in your reply.
-
Which effectively means the messages aren't encrypted. Cool.
schrieb am 10. Juni 2025, 15:05 zuletzt editiert vonI mean they’re encrypted in transit. They’re just not end to end encrypted.
-
I'm surprised nobody posted the surprised_pikachu.gif yet.
schrieb am 10. Juni 2025, 15:52 zuletzt editiert von -
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 10. Juni 2025, 15:54 zuletzt editiert von
Enshittification continues
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 10. Juni 2025, 15:57 zuletzt editiert von
Yes and? Do people who use X really care about privacy. Everyone who even remotely cared already jumped ship and moved on to matrix, signal, Simplex etc.
And im not even mentioning the fact X is owned by a psychopath. But hey let's pretend they care about your privacy.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 10. Juni 2025, 15:59 zuletzt editiert von termaxima@programming.dev 6. Dez. 2025, 18:47
Deleted
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 10. Juni 2025, 16:18 zuletzt editiert von
Stop using fascist things.
Stores, websites, apps, cars, hosting, operating systems, and all other providers of goods/services should be audited by you. You should then ask yourself if you want to give them your money and/or your trust.
-
Stop using fascist things.
Stores, websites, apps, cars, hosting, operating systems, and all other providers of goods/services should be audited by you. You should then ask yourself if you want to give them your money and/or your trust.
schrieb am 10. Juni 2025, 16:29 zuletzt editiert von spankmonkey@lemmy.world 6. Okt. 2025, 18:30I'm trying, but they keep forcing it into devices I already own and even with turning it off in the settings sometimes it gets turned back on during updates. At least avoiding the X/shitter bot is easy enough, but the rest are just as invasive.
-
I mean they’re encrypted in transit. They’re just not end to end encrypted.
schrieb am 10. Juni 2025, 16:56 zuletzt editiert vonDo not look at all those (proprietary) E2EE definitions to closely - you might find several that define TLS as end to end...
-
I'm trying, but they keep forcing it into devices I already own and even with turning it off in the settings sometimes it gets turned back on during updates. At least avoiding the X/shitter bot is easy enough, but the rest are just as invasive.
schrieb am 10. Juni 2025, 16:58 zuletzt editiert vonOut of curiosity what devices are giving you these issues? I may know of some alternatives depending.
-
The one true XChat
schrieb am 10. Juni 2025, 16:59 zuletzt editiert von -
Out of curiosity what devices are giving you these issues? I may know of some alternatives depending.
schrieb am 10. Juni 2025, 17:04 zuletzt editiert vonAnything with a web browser. Work computers. Phone. Have to turn off the AI crap on all of those manually after they were added in updates.
Don't really believe turning off the settings keeps them from farming data either, since they constantly lie about what data they collect and use for training.
-
Do not look at all those (proprietary) E2EE definitions to closely - you might find several that define TLS as end to end...
schrieb am 10. Juni 2025, 18:21 zuletzt editiert von encryptkeeper@lemmy.world 6. Okt. 2025, 20:22I mean TLS is also encryption in transit, it’s in the name. And it would sorta be end to end if you’re terminating TLS at the end you’re trying to talk to.
-
-
AI video is invading YouTube Shorts and Google Photos starting today
Technology48 vor 7 Tagenvor 9 Tagen1
-
-
-
-
-
Groups of AI agents spontaneously form their own social norms without human help
Technology 16. Mai 2025, 20:421
-
OpenAI and the FDA Are Holding Talks About Using AI In Drug Evaluation
Technology 8. Mai 2025, 01:051