SpaceX's Starship blows up ahead of 10th test flight
-
If you like SatNav, accurate weather tracking, and advanced intercontinental communication then ya like rockets ya dipshit.
While Id be the first to ban private rocket launches outright, we shouldn't abandon the advances of the space age because of them.
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 03:33 zuletzt editiert vonYou've got good points, but your needless insults makes your argument fall on deaf ears.
-
Rocket fuel is toxic. Don't cook with it. Don't touch or breathe it. Don't even look at it.
Once it's burned it's mostly safe, aside from the usual problems with combustion products.
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 04:20 zuletzt editiert vonIs LOX and methane really that bad?
-
You've got good points, but your needless insults makes your argument fall on deaf ears.
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 04:40 zuletzt editiert vonThen wallow in thine ignorance pissant.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 04:42 zuletzt editiert von
If you told me that I'd be cheering for space rockets exploding 10 years ago I would have called you crazy. Incredible how much damage that fiend has done to our society.
-
Hardly. Honda have just replicated what Falcon 9 has been doing every week for years.
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 04:47 zuletzt editiert vonHere comes the killjoy!
-
It's less that people are putting faith in Elon (sure, some fanatics might be), but it's that everyone else is somehow even worse.
SpaceX is actually getting stuff to space, despite their prototypes blowing up. Hell, even if this Starship thing is a complete failure and never works, their existing rocket, the Falcon, is still far beyond any of the competition.
The SLS: $10 Billion and a decade late to develop a ship that recycles old Space shuttle parts, then costs $2-3 Billion per launch, and maybe can only launch one every 2 years.
ULA Vulcan: currently years late, still finding problems, and even after all that gets worked out, it can maybe do 6 launches a year?
SpaceX: 1-2 launches per week.
That's not faith, that's just facts. I would absolutely love to have somebody else step up and take SpaceX's crown, but... there really isn't anybody. Bezos's Blue Origin may have the biggest chance, but they are more likely to act like ULA than SpaceX.
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 04:50 zuletzt editiert vonBezos seems pretty happy with space tourism he doesn't wanna work for the government. Gotta kinda be sick to want to in the first place.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 05:24 zuletzt editiert von
Ive only ever heard from third parties that spaceX sucks to work for because they way over work you. Idk if thats actually true. But this kind of thing makes me wonder…
-
We shouldn’t be building rockets PERIOD. They cost too much and are eventually only going to serve trillionaires.
FIX SHIT ON THE GROUND FIRST
That said,
They did a test from 300 meters, sure it’s cool but I think they have a LONG way to go before they are competetive.
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 05:35 zuletzt editiert vonWe can do both? What's a rocket scientist going to do about systemic oppression and the rise of fascism that excludes them from working on rockets still?
-
You've got good points, but your needless insults makes your argument fall on deaf ears.
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 05:36 zuletzt editiert vonSeparating the message from the messenger is a key skill. A right answer doesn't become wrong because it comes from a jerk.
-
Ive only ever heard from third parties that spaceX sucks to work for because they way over work you. Idk if thats actually true. But this kind of thing makes me wonder…
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 05:41 zuletzt editiert vonI've heard the same. I'm sure it certainly doesn't help, but I think also what they're trying to do is really difficult
-
good.
sad that he wasn't on it though.
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 05:43 zuletzt editiert vonI feel bad for all the engineers etc who are working really hard on these projects, only to see their efforts tarnished by the flyblown image of the wanker who owns the company.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 05:45 zuletzt editiert von
They never even made it to the launch.
-
Separating the message from the messenger is a key skill. A right answer doesn't become wrong because it comes from a jerk.
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 05:50 zuletzt editiert vonYep me being an uncouth asshole has little to no bearing on my point. It's like those uppity cunts who act like theyre better just cause they don't swear, usually they are morons I mean Mormons and thusly my inbuilt snob filter works wonders.
-
I think Honda has begun building spaceships/rockets too. Think they chose to build the type that don't explode. link
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 06:21 zuletzt editiert vonThe front fell off.
-
Separating the message from the messenger is a key skill. A right answer doesn't become wrong because it comes from a jerk.
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 06:24 zuletzt editiert vonYou're absolutely right, you absolute fuckwad, and well said, even if you are a shit eating waste of a human.
(Sorry I don't mean it, I feel bad now...)
-
Yep me being an uncouth asshole has little to no bearing on my point. It's like those uppity cunts who act like theyre better just cause they don't swear, usually they are morons I mean Mormons and thusly my inbuilt snob filter works wonders.
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 06:28 zuletzt editiert vonAgreed, but your point will usually be a lot better received if you aren't a dick. SpaceX is a great example- it's a great company, but the head of the company taints the whole thing they are trying to achieve.
It comes down to respect. Even if I'm wrong, treating me with respect will mean I'm more likely to respect you, and if I respect you I'm going to respect your argument.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 06:30 zuletzt editiert von
Whoa. a subpar Elon project? SAY IT ISN'T SO!
-
The front fell off.
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 06:32 zuletzt editiert vonit was towed out of the environment.
-
NASA funded SpaceX based on hitting milestones on their COTS program. Those were just as available to Boeing and Blue Origin, but they had less success meeting those milestones and making a profit under fixed price contracts (as opposed to the traditional cost plus contracts). It's still NASA-defined standards, only with an offloading of the risk and uncertainty onto the private contractors, which was great for SpaceX and terrible for Boeing.
But ultimately it's still just contracting.
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 06:34 zuletzt editiert vonReally interesting— I don’t follow this nearly enough, so thanks
-
Yep me being an uncouth asshole has little to no bearing on my point. It's like those uppity cunts who act like theyre better just cause they don't swear, usually they are morons I mean Mormons and thusly my inbuilt snob filter works wonders.
schrieb am 20. Juni 2025, 06:38 zuletzt editiert vonHey there I didn’t complain or downvote but also declined to upvote cuz of the two little tiny words of ad hom…..
… (idea!) …
DINGUS! Dingus would’ve saved it!
ya dingus
Perfect, feels very Lemmy-appropriate—gets the insult with a perfect lulz factor so even the parent commenter could’ve kinda laughed (I hope ppl can take jokes!)
…sorry I know I’m not your mom, hope this doesn’t come across maximally prescriptive (just my 2c!)
-
Wikipedia loses challenge against UK Online Safety Act rules
Technology165 vor 8 Tagenvor 10 Tagen1
-
-
AI-backed medical debt company claims payment plans can help US healthcare costs
Technology165 vor 26 Tagenvor 28 Tagen1
-
Just launched an AI-powered note-taker to help you write 10x faster!
Technology 10. Juli 2025, 02:102
-
Elon Musk’s A.I. Company Faces Lawsuit Over Gas-Burning Turbines |The company, xAI, has installed several dozen turbines in Memphis without proper permits, the group said, polluting a nearby community
Technology 18. Juni 2025, 12:541
-
-
Microsoft CEO says up to 30% of the company's code was written by AI | TechCrunch
Technology 30. Apr. 2025, 06:201
-