Skip to content

YouTube might slow down your videos if you block ads

Technology
226 151 260
  • AI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon study

    Technology technology
    89
    1
    528 Stimmen
    89 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    K
    For me as a software developer the accuracy is more in the 95%+ range. On one hand the built in copilot chat widget in Intellij basically replaces a lot my google queries. On the other hand it is rather fucking good at executing some rewrites that is a fucking chore to do manually, but can easily be done by copilot. Imagine you have a script that initializes your DB with some test data. You have an Insert into statement with lots of columns and rows so Inser into (column1,....,column n) Values row1, Row 2 Row n Addig a new column with test data for each row is a PITA, but copilot handles it without issue. Similarly when writing unit tests you do a lot of edge case testing which is a bunch of almost same looking tests with maybe one variable changing, at most you write one of those tests, then copilot will auto generate the rest after you name the next unit test, pretty good at guessing what you want to do in that test, at least with my naming scheme. So yeah, it's way overrated for many-many things, but for programming it's a pretty awesome productivity tool.
  • A Deep Dive into All Four Generations of the Honda Acty Truck

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • The Prototype: One Step Closer To Fusion Power

    Technology technology
    6
    1
    115 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    D
    You're forgettinf the simplest reason using Occams Razor. Nuclear energy would have bitten into Oil and Gas. Definitely helped lobby against nuclear power in western countries where companies have as much power as governments.
  • Why Ohio Trusts Baker Chiropractic for Arthritis Pain Relief

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 209 Stimmen
    16 Beiträge
    55 Aufrufe
    J
    It doesn't seem to be the case. As far as I can tell, the law only covers realistic digital imitations of a person's likeness (deepfakes), with an exception for parody and satire. If you appear in public that is effectively license for someone to capture your image.
  • 2k Stimmen
    317 Beiträge
    82 Aufrufe
    M
    I have a perfectly fine moral framework According to what? Not everyone has the same beliefs and negative attitude toward it Not everyone thinks female circumcision is bad either. for some it can even have a positive impact. Lol I don’t believe in absolutist terms. Do you absolutely believe that? While your continued failure to comprehend my initial comment is astonishing Your initial comment is indicative of somebody who hasn't thought seriously about their worldview but feels confident about critiquing others.
  • Where do I install this nvme drive on my laptop?

    Technology technology
    19
    2
    18 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    46 Aufrufe
    K
    ??? The thing is on the right side of the pic. Your image is up side down. Edit: oh.duh, the two horizontal slots. I'm a dummy. Sorry.
  • 0 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    29 Aufrufe
    P
    I applaud this, but I still say it's not far enough. Adjusted, the amount might match, but 121.000 is still easier to cough up for a billionaire than 50 is for a single mother of two who can barely make ends meet