Skip to content

YouTube might slow down your videos if you block ads

Technology
226 151 2.0k
  • Coding and Gaming on AR Glasses

    Technology technology
    8
    34 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    28 Aufrufe
    shatur@lemmy.mlS
    I think the glasses are quite solid, but I haven’t dropped them yet I never buy additional warranties.
  • 100R — working offgrid efficiently

    Technology technology
    4
    30 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    40 Aufrufe
    M
    Love 100 rabbits! They have some very interesting projects and articles.
  • It's rude to show AI output to people

    Technology technology
    53
    1
    453 Stimmen
    53 Beiträge
    668 Aufrufe
    F
    I gave advice, advice rarely follows what you've experienced or people wouldn't feel the need to give it.
  • 21 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Electric Bikes

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Queer Dating Apps: Beware Who You Trust With Your Intimate Data

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    72 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    18 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Firefox 140 Brings Tab Unload, Custom Search & New ESR

    Technology technology
    41
    1
    234 Stimmen
    41 Beiträge
    527 Aufrufe
    S
    Read again. I quoted something along the lines of "just as much a development decision as a marketing one" and I said, it wasn't a development decision, so what's left? Firefox released just as frequently before, just that they didn’t increase the major version that often. This does not appear to be true. Why don't you take a look at the version history instead of some marketing blog post? https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/releases/ Version 2 had 20 releases within 730 days, averaging one release every 36.5 days. Version 3 had 19 releases within 622 days, averaging 32.7 days per release. But these releases were unscheduled, so they were released when they were done. Now they are on a fixed 90-day schedule, no matter if anything worthwhile was complete or not, plus hotfix releases whenever they are necessary. That's not faster, but instead scheduled, and also they are incrementing the major version even if no major change was included. That's what the blog post was alluding to. In the before times, a major version number increase indicated major changes. Now it doesn't anymore, which means sysadmins still need to consider each release a major release, even if it doesn't contain major changes because it might contain them and the version name doesn't say anything about whether it does or not. It's nothing but a marketing change, moving from "version numbering means something" to "big number go up".
  • 141 Stimmen
    22 Beiträge
    206 Aufrufe
    P
    That would be 1 in 4 users and that's just not accurate at all. What you mean to say is 25% of Windows users still use windows 7. Its still an alarming statistic, and no wonder bruteforce cyberattacks are still so effective today considering it hasn't received security updates in like 10 years. I sincerely hope those people aren't connecting their devices to the internet like, at all. I'm fairly sure at this point even using a Debian based distro is better than sticking to windows 7.