New Executive Order:AI must agree on the Administration views on Sex,Race, cant mention what they deem to be Critical Race Theory,Unconscious Bias,Intersectionality,Systemic Racism or "Transgenderism
Technology
81
Beiträge
63
Kommentatoren
0
Aufrufe
-
Would you rather our current administration make their decisions by using the lowest bidder LLM, or their own brains?
The LLM probably makes better decisions lol
-
cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/34629331
cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/34472919
For example, one major AI model changed the race or sex of historical figures — including the Pope, the Founding Fathers, and Vikings — when prompted for images because it was trained to prioritize DEI requirements at the cost of accuracy. Another AI model refused to produce images celebrating the achievements of white people, even while complying with the same request for people of other races.
Ahhh, so white men are the victims of woke AI, got it.
-
Are there currently any government contracts put at risk by this? I didn't think that the feds were major spenders on AI. And is Trump aware that Musk is currently the one man trying to provide the sort of AI that Trump wants?
It's...shifting. Unfortunately.
-
How so? You can say whatever you want in America today, as long as the President would agree. How is that not Freedom~TM~?
("Freedom" is a registered trademark of the Trump Organization)
FYI: You can use superscript by using the
^symbol.
Like this: Free Speech^TMOr juat use this symbol:
-
Well, in practice, no.
Do you think any corporation is going to bother making a separate model for government contracts versus any other use? I mean, why would they. So unless you can pony up enough cash to compete with a lucrative government contract (and the fact none of us can is, on fact, the while point), the end result will involve these requirements being adopted by the overwhelming majority of generative AI available on the market.
So in reality, no, this absolutely will not be limited to models purchased by the feds. Frankly, I believe choosing to think otherwise to be dangerously naive.
No. You would use a base model (GPT-4o) to get a reliable language model to which you would add a set of rules that the chat bot follows. Every company has its own rules, it is already widely in use to add data like company-specific manuals and support documents. Not rocketscience at all.
-
No. You would use a base model (GPT-4o) to get a reliable language model to which you would add a set of rules that the chat bot follows. Every company has its own rules, it is already widely in use to add data like company-specific manuals and support documents. Not rocketscience at all.
So many examples of this method failing I don't even know where to start. Most visible, of course, was how that approach failed to stop Grok from "being woke" for like, a year or more.
Frankly, you sound like you're talking straight out of your ass.
-
Who is responsible? The SW creator? The trainer? The source of the training data? The hosting data center?
What are the penalties? Who enforces this? Who investigates?
lol look at this guy still thinking in terms of "the crime comes first".
You arrest the dissident, then choose which 'law' they've broken. Don't worry about the details. 'Who is responsible'? The guy you just arrested. Duh.
-
FYI: You can use superscript by using the
^symbol.
Like this: Free Speech^TMOr juat use this symbol:
I know, but it looks derpier that way
-
Misleading title. Applies only to AI bought by the Feds.
Because Executive Orders aren’t laws. They’re just guidelines for the executive branch of the federal government, which the POTUS is in charge of. It can’t affect private entities like AI businesses, because that would require an actual act of congress.
Notably, this would potentially determine what kinds of contracts the executive branch was able to make. For instance, maybe the government wants to contract out a LLM instead of building their own. This EO could affect which companies are able to bid on that contract, by adding these same restrictions to any LLM that they provide. But on its own, the EO is just that; an order to the executive branch of the federal government.
-
I read through the thing, and it's a doozy. he seems triggered by the fact that AI might make a picture where Washington is a black man, or Hamilton is Latino. I hope he hasn't been to Broadway lately....
“Immigrants, we get the job done.”
-
So many examples of this method failing I don't even know where to start. Most visible, of course, was how that approach failed to stop Grok from "being woke" for like, a year or more.
Frankly, you sound like you're talking straight out of your ass.
Sure, it can go wrong, it is not fool-proof. Just like building a new model can cause unwanted surprises.
BTW. There are many theories about Grok's unethical behavior but this one is new to me. The reasons I was familiar with are: unfiltered training data, no ethical output restrictions, programming errors or incorrect system maintenance, strategic errors (Elon!), publishing before proper testing.
-
cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/34629331
cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/34472919
add this to your ublock, ublacklist, or adguard router rules: https://github.com/laylavish/uBlockOrigin-HUGE-AI-Blocklist
add this to your robots.txt on any sites you own: https://robotstxt.com/ai
-
They are not laws whatsoever. They aren't anything more but words on a paper. You can't take it to court and argue that you are complying with an executive order and HAVE to. That's why they keep losing all of these lawsuits based on EO's. You can't just make some shit up and have it fly in court.
The top of the Executive branch can order these things. Executive, it's in the name.
We rely on the courts to check that power. This is Constitution Class 101.
-
cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/34629331
cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/34472919
This dude is just throwing all kinds of ninja smoke on the floor trying to get out from under that Epstein File case. He's already "DOGE'D" everything he just said out of existence. He basically wants Grok everywhere but without saying it because he doesn't want to show Elon he still loves him. But he can't enforce this beyond his own government which he is still crippling at the moment. That white house page is like a giant tweet poster for Orange Chicken Little and serves as a distraction.
-
Honestly this order seems empty. Does the government even have a need for general LLMs? Why would they need an AI to answer simple questions?
As much as I dislike Trump, this shouldn't impact any AI available to the general public.
Why would they need an AI to answer simple questions?
to shift blame and responsibility, to create a more modern deity, ...
-
add this to your ublock, ublacklist, or adguard router rules: https://github.com/laylavish/uBlockOrigin-HUGE-AI-Blocklist
add this to your robots.txt on any sites you own: https://robotstxt.com/ai
this is great! I was just thinking about this yesterday.
-
lol look at this guy still thinking in terms of "the crime comes first".
You arrest the dissident, then choose which 'law' they've broken. Don't worry about the details. 'Who is responsible'? The guy you just arrested. Duh.
I'm sure you're right. How pre-post-truth of me.
-
The top of the Executive branch can order these things. Executive, it's in the name.
We rely on the courts to check that power. This is Constitution Class 101.
No, they can't. Congress is the body that enacts laws.
-
Because Executive Orders aren’t laws. They’re just guidelines for the executive branch of the federal government, which the POTUS is in charge of. It can’t affect private entities like AI businesses, because that would require an actual act of congress.
Notably, this would potentially determine what kinds of contracts the executive branch was able to make. For instance, maybe the government wants to contract out a LLM instead of building their own. This EO could affect which companies are able to bid on that contract, by adding these same restrictions to any LLM that they provide. But on its own, the EO is just that; an order to the executive branch of the federal government.
Then that contracted AI gets used for customer service at a public facing federal agency.
-
FYI: You can use superscript by using the
^symbol.
Like this: Free Speech^TMOr juat use this symbol:
Converters are handy as well, i.e. https://www.madeintext.com/superscript-generator/
I use this all the time for chem shit like typing out "PaCO₂"
-
Itch.io deindexes NSFW games after becoming the latest target of skittish credit card companies and anti-porn group Collective Shout, catching an award-winning indie and more in the crossfire
Technology
1
-
Beeper's all-in-one messaging app relaunches with an on-device model and premium 10$/mo and 50$/mo upgrades
Technology
1
-
-
-
Brazil's supreme court rules that platforms like Facebook and X can be held liable for user posts, requiring them to remove content even without a court order
Technology
1
-
Microsoft Pivots, Offers Free Windows 10 Updates after End-Of-Life Deadline with a Strategic Catch - WinBuzzer
Technology
1
-
-
