New Executive Order:AI must agree on the Administration views on Sex,Race, cant mention what they deem to be Critical Race Theory,Unconscious Bias,Intersectionality,Systemic Racism or "Transgenderism
Technology
81
Beiträge
63
Kommentatoren
0
Aufrufe
-
Well, in practice, no.
Do you think any corporation is going to bother making a separate model for government contracts versus any other use? I mean, why would they. So unless you can pony up enough cash to compete with a lucrative government contract (and the fact none of us can is, on fact, the while point), the end result will involve these requirements being adopted by the overwhelming majority of generative AI available on the market.
So in reality, no, this absolutely will not be limited to models purchased by the feds. Frankly, I believe choosing to think otherwise to be dangerously naive.
No. You would use a base model (GPT-4o) to get a reliable language model to which you would add a set of rules that the chat bot follows. Every company has its own rules, it is already widely in use to add data like company-specific manuals and support documents. Not rocketscience at all.
-
No. You would use a base model (GPT-4o) to get a reliable language model to which you would add a set of rules that the chat bot follows. Every company has its own rules, it is already widely in use to add data like company-specific manuals and support documents. Not rocketscience at all.
So many examples of this method failing I don't even know where to start. Most visible, of course, was how that approach failed to stop Grok from "being woke" for like, a year or more.
Frankly, you sound like you're talking straight out of your ass.
-
Who is responsible? The SW creator? The trainer? The source of the training data? The hosting data center?
What are the penalties? Who enforces this? Who investigates?
lol look at this guy still thinking in terms of "the crime comes first".
You arrest the dissident, then choose which 'law' they've broken. Don't worry about the details. 'Who is responsible'? The guy you just arrested. Duh.
-
FYI: You can use superscript by using the
^symbol.
Like this: Free Speech^TMOr juat use this symbol:
I know, but it looks derpier that way
-
Misleading title. Applies only to AI bought by the Feds.
Because Executive Orders aren’t laws. They’re just guidelines for the executive branch of the federal government, which the POTUS is in charge of. It can’t affect private entities like AI businesses, because that would require an actual act of congress.
Notably, this would potentially determine what kinds of contracts the executive branch was able to make. For instance, maybe the government wants to contract out a LLM instead of building their own. This EO could affect which companies are able to bid on that contract, by adding these same restrictions to any LLM that they provide. But on its own, the EO is just that; an order to the executive branch of the federal government.
-
I read through the thing, and it's a doozy. he seems triggered by the fact that AI might make a picture where Washington is a black man, or Hamilton is Latino. I hope he hasn't been to Broadway lately....
“Immigrants, we get the job done.”
-
So many examples of this method failing I don't even know where to start. Most visible, of course, was how that approach failed to stop Grok from "being woke" for like, a year or more.
Frankly, you sound like you're talking straight out of your ass.
Sure, it can go wrong, it is not fool-proof. Just like building a new model can cause unwanted surprises.
BTW. There are many theories about Grok's unethical behavior but this one is new to me. The reasons I was familiar with are: unfiltered training data, no ethical output restrictions, programming errors or incorrect system maintenance, strategic errors (Elon!), publishing before proper testing.
-
cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/34629331
cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/34472919
add this to your ublock, ublacklist, or adguard router rules: https://github.com/laylavish/uBlockOrigin-HUGE-AI-Blocklist
add this to your robots.txt on any sites you own: https://robotstxt.com/ai
-
They are not laws whatsoever. They aren't anything more but words on a paper. You can't take it to court and argue that you are complying with an executive order and HAVE to. That's why they keep losing all of these lawsuits based on EO's. You can't just make some shit up and have it fly in court.
The top of the Executive branch can order these things. Executive, it's in the name.
We rely on the courts to check that power. This is Constitution Class 101.
-
cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/34629331
cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/34472919
This dude is just throwing all kinds of ninja smoke on the floor trying to get out from under that Epstein File case. He's already "DOGE'D" everything he just said out of existence. He basically wants Grok everywhere but without saying it because he doesn't want to show Elon he still loves him. But he can't enforce this beyond his own government which he is still crippling at the moment. That white house page is like a giant tweet poster for Orange Chicken Little and serves as a distraction.
-
Honestly this order seems empty. Does the government even have a need for general LLMs? Why would they need an AI to answer simple questions?
As much as I dislike Trump, this shouldn't impact any AI available to the general public.
Why would they need an AI to answer simple questions?
to shift blame and responsibility, to create a more modern deity, ...
-
add this to your ublock, ublacklist, or adguard router rules: https://github.com/laylavish/uBlockOrigin-HUGE-AI-Blocklist
add this to your robots.txt on any sites you own: https://robotstxt.com/ai
this is great! I was just thinking about this yesterday.
-
lol look at this guy still thinking in terms of "the crime comes first".
You arrest the dissident, then choose which 'law' they've broken. Don't worry about the details. 'Who is responsible'? The guy you just arrested. Duh.
I'm sure you're right. How pre-post-truth of me.
-
The top of the Executive branch can order these things. Executive, it's in the name.
We rely on the courts to check that power. This is Constitution Class 101.
No, they can't. Congress is the body that enacts laws.
-
Because Executive Orders aren’t laws. They’re just guidelines for the executive branch of the federal government, which the POTUS is in charge of. It can’t affect private entities like AI businesses, because that would require an actual act of congress.
Notably, this would potentially determine what kinds of contracts the executive branch was able to make. For instance, maybe the government wants to contract out a LLM instead of building their own. This EO could affect which companies are able to bid on that contract, by adding these same restrictions to any LLM that they provide. But on its own, the EO is just that; an order to the executive branch of the federal government.
Then that contracted AI gets used for customer service at a public facing federal agency.
-
FYI: You can use superscript by using the
^symbol.
Like this: Free Speech^TMOr juat use this symbol:
Converters are handy as well, i.e. https://www.madeintext.com/superscript-generator/
I use this all the time for chem shit like typing out "PaCO₂"
-
this is great! I was just thinking about this yesterday.
-
No, they can't. Congress is the body that enacts laws.
Are you seriously arguing the President cannot order the executive branch of government to, uh, execute his orders? Would we have had this conversation when Obama or Biden was in office and writing executive orders?
Don't be silly. Just because Trump is abusing the fuck out of the power, and the courts are hit-and-miss, doesn't change the Constitution. We can probably agree that the Constitution is no longer worth the paper it's written on, but it exists and defines our government.
I feel like I'm arguing with someone that agrees with me.
-
cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/34629331
cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/34472919
You hear that everyone. So for AI to reject your content just put in facts about systemic racism and now you have an AI blocker.
-
Are you seriously arguing the President cannot order the executive branch of government to, uh, execute his orders? Would we have had this conversation when Obama or Biden was in office and writing executive orders?
Don't be silly. Just because Trump is abusing the fuck out of the power, and the courts are hit-and-miss, doesn't change the Constitution. We can probably agree that the Constitution is no longer worth the paper it's written on, but it exists and defines our government.
I feel like I'm arguing with someone that agrees with me.
An Executive Order is not law, and cannot be misconstrued as law.
Example: Trump says solar panels are outlawed.
Outcome: NothingExample: Trump says no Trans people in sports
Outcome: Nothing. In fact, multiple states sued him and won a stay, and if they even attempt to enforce that as law, they are immediately not only breaking the law, but a judicial order, and opening themselves to civil prosecution which they will certainly lose in court.Example: Trump says some dumb shit about plastic straws
Outcome: Everyone using paper straws still using paper straws.These bullshit decrees are meaningless except to the sheep working for him. They can't enforce a goddamn thing.
