Skip to content

Front Brake Lights Could Drastically Diminish Road Accident Rates

Technology
336 164 2
  • Welcome to the web we lost

    Technology technology
    22
    1
    180 Stimmen
    22 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    C
    Is it though? Its always far easier to be loud and obnoxious than do something constructive, even with the internet and LLMs, in fact those things are amplifiers which if anything make the attention imbalance even more drastic and unrepresentative of actual human behaviour. In the time it takes me to write this comment some troll can write a dozen hateful ones, or a bot can write a thousand. Doesn't mean humans are shitty in a 1000/1 ratio, just means shitty people can now be a thousand times louder.
  • 36 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    C
    Definitely don't want to be painting my face every day
  • Google is Using AI to Censor Independent Websites

    Technology technology
    39
    1
    147 Stimmen
    39 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    P
    Bullshit Capitalism at its core that you allow free trading. And. It. Has. Been. Successful. Capitalism is what killed the USSR by sheer force. The problem arises when it's not controlled at all. Apply those rules well and you get a powerhouse generating huge progress for everyone and the taxes and all will be able to pay for the social security network on top of that ensuring nobody gets left behind You can go to communism Island if you want and suffer under economic mismanagent, bit I'd rather have capitalism, thank you
  • MCP 101: An Introduction to the MCP Standard

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    5 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    H
    Really? [image: 60a7b1c3-946c-4def-92dd-c04169f01892.gif]
  • 11 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    1 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 11 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    E
    No, just laminated ones. Closed at one end. Easy enough to make or buy. You can even improvise the propellant.
  • 1 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    L
    I think the principle could be applied to scan outside of the machine. It is making requests to 127.0.0.1:{port} - effectively using your computer as a "server" in a sort of reverse-SSRF attack. There's no reason it can't make requests to 10.10.10.1:{port} as well. Of course you'd need to guess the netmask of the network address range first, but this isn't that hard. In fact, if you consider that at least as far as the desktop site goes, most people will be browsing the web behind a standard consumer router left on defaults where it will be the first device in the DHCP range (e.g. 192.168.0.1 or 10.10.10.1), which tends to have a web UI on the LAN interface (port 8080, 80 or 443), then you'd only realistically need to scan a few addresses to determine the network address range. If you want to keep noise even lower, using just 192.168.0.1:80 and 192.168.1.1:80 I'd wager would cover 99% of consumer routers. From there you could assume that it's a /24 netmask and scan IPs to your heart's content. You could do top 10 most common ports type scans and go in-depth on anything you get a result on. I haven't tested this, but I don't see why it wouldn't work, when I was testing 13ft.io - a self-hosted 12ft.io paywall remover, an SSRF flaw like this absolutely let you perform any network request to any LAN address in range.
  • WhatsApp provides no cryptographic management for group messages

    Technology technology
    3
    1
    17 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    S
    Just be sure to add only the people you want to be there. I've heard some people add others and it's a bit messy