Any studies about this "getting worse" or just anecdotes? I do routinely use them and I feel they are getting better (my workplace uses Google suite so I have access to gemini). Just last week it helped me debug an ipv6 ra problem that I couldn't crack, and I learned a few useful commands on the way.

How can anyone look at that face and trust anything that mad man could have to say.

The Demand didn't decline. The state imposed a strict high barrier to trade that prevented it from being fulfilled.

If anyone has ever wondered what it would look like if tech giants went all in on "brute force" programming, this is it. This is what it looks like.

There's experimental storages where heat is pumped to underground pools or sand, but as far as I know there's heat exchangers and radiators to outside, so majority of excess heat is just wasted to outside. But absolute majority of them are closed loop systems since you need something else than plain water anyways to prevent freezing in the winter.

So when people tell you about the positive changes they’ve made you in return like to point out that they still aren’t living up to your standards? I’m not sure that’s the way to go to motivate and inspire people to do better. But you do you I guess.

I did a quick calculation and got to around 500 queries per quarter pounder. Lot of guesstimation and rounding though, but I’m pretty sure I got close enough to know that you’re off by quite a lot.

Edit to add:
I used 21.9kg CO2 per 1kg of beef and 4.32 grams per ChatGPT query for my rough estimate.

However that 4.32 number is already over a year old. Chances are it’s way outdated but everyone still keeps on quoting it. It definitely does not take into account that ChatGPT often “thinks” now, because chain of thought is likely as expensive as multiple queries by itself. Additionally the models are more advanced than a year ago, but also more costly and that CO2 amount everyone keeps quoting doesn’t even mention which model they used. If anyone can find the original source of this number I’d be very curious.

That makes the vast majority of managers, MBAs, salespeople and "normies" like your grandma and Uncle Bob insane.

Correct most of these people are insane, the average person is so fucking dumb and insane today its mind numbing.

They literally don't know. "GPT-5" is several models, with a model gating in front to choose which model to use depending on how "hard" it thinks the question is. They've already been tweaking the front-end to change how it cuts over. They've definitely going to keep changing it.

Fine: make it a data-center powered by water-wheel generators. Water powered AND cooled!

He looks like an old Chuck E Cheese animatronic. Like someone powered him down and he returned to default rest/storage mode.

The only accessible data come from mistral, most other ai devs are not exactly happy to share the inner workings of their tools.

Important to point out this is really only valid towards Western AI companies. Chinese AI models have mostly been open source with open papers.

Do you use Claude Code? It's the only time I've had 90%+ success rate.

Do you use Claude Code? It's the only time I've had 90%+ success rate.

you're just personally insulted.

I swear to God this attitude is why people don't like what you're saying. I am all for weighing the two against each other but the "I am more moral than thou" is why I left the church.

I have, and it doesn't at least not on the dev-ops stuff I work on.

Pump it Sammy, pump it harder!!

Probably not, since I'm a vegan.

Le reddit moment

true lol