Imagining complaining about someone tipping out fresh water, while eating a burger when a single kilo of beef uses between 15,000 to 200,000 liters.

Like, until you stop doing the worst thing a single consumer can do to the planet for literally nothing but greed and pleasure (eating meat instead of healthier alternatives), you have no leg to criticize.

Yep, that's also pretty safe.

Do you have a citation handy for that?

Do you know what I mean by "scaling"? Because going by your reply, you don't.

Bingo. If you routinely use LLM's/AI you've recently seen it first hand. ALL of them have become noticeably worse over the past few months. Even if simply using it as a basic tool, it's worse. Claude for all the praise it receives has also gotten worse. I've noticed it starting to forget context or constantly contradicting itself. even Claude Code.

The release of GPT5 is proof in the pudding that a wall has been hit and the bubble is bursting. There's nothing left to train on and all the LLM's have been consuming each others waste as a result. I've talked about it on here several times already due to my work but companies are also seeing this. They're scrambling to undo the fuck up of using AI to build their stuff, None of what they used it to build scales. None of it. And you go on Linkedin and see all the techbros desperately trying to hype the mounds of shit that remain.

I don't know what's next for AI but this current generation of it is dying. It didn't work.

It warms me heart to see ya'll finally tune-in to the scumbag tactics our abusers constantly employ.

I disagree.

There's so much proud ignorance in this world, it's great to always remind the average person how they're contributing to problems they don't even realize.

We should bring their hypocrisy to light, or else they will legitimately go through life thinking that there isn't a problem.

If he did, would it change your views on eating meat at all?

Not really. It shows that he used scale in the appropriate manner.

I think you're just grasping at straws by saying what sounds nice in your head instead of engaging in a legitimate argument.

It's good to bring out the hypocrisy among you people.

I like watching you squirm whenever a logical argument causes your cognitive dissonance to flare up.

The average person is an insecure moron, and it's funny.

Get an original joke.

You can, but you also open yourself up to criticism of your hypocrisy.

Right now, your cognitive dissonance is flaring up because you have to simultaneously criticize someone for contributing to a problem while contributing to it yourself.

I'm not even vegan, but I absolutely love watching meat-eaters squirm because it reinforces my notion that the average person is a complete idiot and should not be taken seriously.

Yes, I'm a piece of shit for using a phone made by a capitalist corporation and contributes to harming the planet. I don't deny that I live in a horrible society that forces me to be a bad human just to survive.

I also don't call people stupid for telling me my device is bad for the environment. I still eat meat, I'm not a vegan, but I understand and completely agree that it's terrible for the environment. By recognizing it, I can be conscious of my consumption and reduce it.

I also use LLMs conservatively, I use them where they add value and I don't use them frivolously to generate shitty AI slop.

I'm conscious of its dangers and that drives my consumption of it.

But I don't pick and choose. I don't eat animal products three meals a day and bitch about someone using an LLM to edit a file instead of manually working on it for five hours.

Just be consistent is the message they were communicating, not that you shouldn't complain about 85%.

I said "scaling" not "scale". "Scaling" refers to how output and expenses of the enterprise behaves as it becomes bigger or smaller. Threeduck seems to think it means "big". And then immediately refers the holocaust for some reason.

Though, the term is broad, hence why I asked them about how they interpret the term.

Yeah, you're the one who's confused about the definition.

Same, I'm very aware that my selfish actions cause harm to the environment and I do try to be conservative about meat, electricity, and water usage. I don't even own a car.

But "I swear to God, if you aren't vegan," which is what OP said, is hardly the same as "keep it consistent." It feels like they're telling us both that our efforts are pointless because we aren't vegan. They could have said, try cutting meat from your diet to help more, or give veganism a thought. It comes off as insufferably arrogant, you know?

I'll end my rant now, haha. Sorry.

I'm very much aware of my hypocrisy, but I do my best in other ways to help.

If people like OP are going to be dismissive of my efforts, then I guess they're free to think that — just like I'm free to think that kind of hate keeping is stupid.

So duck programming right?

I'd ask you to read the Wikipedia disambiguation page on scaling (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scaling), but you're likely too scared to consider anything that doesn't conform to your simplistic worldview.

I was initially impressed by the 'reasoning' features of LLMs, but most recently ChatGPT gave me a response to a question in which it stated five or six possible answers sparated by "oh, but that can't be right, so it must be...", and none of them was right lmao. Thought for like 30 seconds to give me a selection of wrong answers!