Skip to content

Reddit will block the Internet Archive

Technology
156 101 1.6k
  • Tesla loses Autopilot wrongful death case in $329 million verdict

    Technology technology
    185
    1
    1k Stimmen
    185 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    N
    So, turns out Tesla really is going to try and get the verdict tossed by the judge due to trial and/or jury mistake rather than (or in addition) to an appeal. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.593426/gov.uscourts.flsd.593426.568.0.pdf Tesla Is Entitled to Judgment as a Matter of Law (or at Least a New Trial) on Liability. For Tesla to be liable in any amount for this tragic accident, Plaintiffs were required to prove both that Tesla’s 2019 Model S was defective in some way and that the defective design or warnings caused McGee to blow through a stop sign and crash his car into an SUV that was parked well off the road when he was pushing the accelerator while fishing around for his phone. Lesnik v. Duval Ford, LLC, 185 So. 3d 577, 581 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016). Plaintiffs’ liability case hinges on two experts whose testimony did not meet the standards established by Federal Rule of Evidence 702. Especially without their testimony, the record cannot sustain the verdict. But even with their testimony, Plaintiffs failed as a matter of law to establish that the 2019 Model S—which provided a carefully engineered system and offered extensive warnings on its breakthrough Autopilot system—was defective or caused the injuries that Plaintiffs suffered after McGee crashed into Benavides and Angulo. The Court should grant judgment as a matter of law in Tesla’s favor on liability or, at a minimum, a new trial. Edit: Also I was asking googles AI about differences between the term JMOL and what I saw and posted about earlier JNOV, and they're apparently the same thing. One used to be for before the verdict, and one after, but now it's just the same term. They're basically saying the Jury got it wrong with or without the evidence.
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    23 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 49 Stimmen
    14 Beiträge
    173 Aufrufe
    t_berium@lemmy.worldT
    It's about control.
  • Tracing the Honda Acty’s Evolution: Generation by Generation

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    26 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 438 Stimmen
    104 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    P
    I'm pretty sure I disabled/removed it when I got this phone. I don't specifically remember doing it but when I get a new phone, I watch some YouTube videos on how to purge all the crap I don't want. I read an article that mentioned using command line stuff to eliminate it and it kind looked familiar. I think I did this. I really should write stuff down.
  • 205 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    84 Aufrufe
    F
    Imagine if the US gets saved by the fucking Mexican cartels that'd be crazy. Please let it happen
  • France considers requiring Musk’s X to verify users’ age

    Technology technology
    20
    1
    142 Stimmen
    20 Beiträge
    212 Aufrufe
    C
    TBH, age verification services exist. If it becomes law, integrating them shouldn't be more difficult than integrating a OIDC login. So everyone should be able to do it. Depending on these services, you might not even need to give a name, or, because they are separate entities, don't give your name to the platform using them. Other parts of regulation are more difficult. Like these "upload filters" that need to figure out if something shared via a service is violating any copyright before it is made available.
  • 87 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    156 Aufrufe
    T
    If you want to stay on the bleeding edge you've got to be a reversal of Europe, which means allowing innovation and competition. Hence why VT is nearly 70% US.