SpaceX's Starship blows up ahead of 10th test flight
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 17:45 zuletzt editiert von
It's kinda fun to be living in a time where rockets regularly blow up again. Apart from, you know, everything else going on and not wanting astronauts to die.
-
idk, got to check that "is Musk already dead" tracker community
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 17:58 zuletzt editiert vonIf this is real, please post the link!
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 18:09 zuletzt editiert von
It's not a starship, at best it's a low Earth orbit ship.
-
It's not a starship, at best it's a low Earth orbit ship.
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 18:10 zuletzt editiert vonWell, now it's recycling, right?
-
If this is real, please post the link!
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 18:15 zuletzt editiert von expatriado@lemmy.worldIs Elon Musk Dead Yet? - Lemmy.World
1. Please include the health status (alive, not alive) in the title of your post. 2. Behave.
(lemmy.world)
looks like last post was 4 days ago, but was fairly active before that
-
Well, now it's recycling, right?
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 18:24 zuletzt editiert vonCan you smell burning Spock.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 18:35 zuletzt editiert von
That's better efficiency. It gets to the blowing up part faster than before
-
People live around there, so harm is definitely being done to the air they breathe and the environment they live in.
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 18:35 zuletzt editiert vonit is liquid oxygen and liquid methane deflagrating, the main result is water and CO2. not exactly harmful
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 18:42 zuletzt editiert von oyzmo@lemmy.world
I think Honda has begun building spaceships/rockets too. Think they chose to build the type that don't explode. link
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 18:48 zuletzt editiert von
I now have the Street Fighter voice in my head going:
"Honda Wins!"
For the killjoy that will come pointing out that SpaceX is at another level of development etc., yes, I know that.
Japan also has a constitution written by the US that doesn't permit them to have long-range missiles. -
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 19:05 zuletzt editiert von
Break out the marshmallows
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 19:06 zuletzt editiert von
Musk's starships are blowing up like his reputation
-
Boeing and someone else are trying too. Way behind Space X. So no, not "entire space program"...
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 19:23 zuletzt editiert vonFuck all commercial dependency. Fully fund NASA, and let them like what they did back in the 60s, which no company could have done.
Stop relying on corporations to lead our space programs. It's too important to leave to grifters and corner cutters.
-
Boeing and someone else are trying too. Way behind Space X. So no, not "entire space program"...
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 19:23 zuletzt editiert vonIf Starship wasn't constantly exploding you might have a point. Seems as though that the reality is that they're all pretty much at the same spot but Elon wants to pretend that they aren't.
-
Is Elon Musk Dead Yet? - Lemmy.World
1. Please include the health status (alive, not alive) in the title of your post. 2. Behave.
(lemmy.world)
looks like last post was 4 days ago, but was fairly active before that
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 19:29 zuletzt editiert vonThank you!
-
Fuck all commercial dependency. Fully fund NASA, and let them like what they did back in the 60s, which no company could have done.
Stop relying on corporations to lead our space programs. It's too important to leave to grifters and corner cutters.
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 19:33 zuletzt editiert vonNASA has always been dependent on commercial for profit entities as contractors. The Space Shuttle was developed by Rockwell International (which was later acquired by Boeing). The Apollo Program relied heavily on Boeing, Douglas Aircraft (which later merged into McDonnell Douglas, and then merged with Boeing), and North American Aviation (which later became Rockwell and was acquired by Boeing), and IBM. Lots of cutting edge stuff in that era happened from government contracts throwing money at private corporations.
That's the whole military industrial complex Eisenhower was talking about.
The only difference with today is that space companies have other customers to choose from, not just NASA (or the Air Force/Space Force).
-
It's kinda fun to be living in a time where rockets regularly blow up again. Apart from, you know, everything else going on and not wanting astronauts to die.
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 19:48 zuletzt editiert vonHonestly, rocket development has always been filled with explosions - the Saturn V had like 6 engine-out events during Apollo and the early Falcon 9 tests were just as explosive. what's different now is we get to see the failures in HD livestreams instead of classified footage that would've been buried in the 60s.
-
This post did not contain any content.schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 19:50 zuletzt editiert von
-
Can you smell burning Spock.
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 19:52 zuletzt editiert vonI dunno, what does burnt Spock smell like?
-
I think Honda has begun building spaceships/rockets too. Think they chose to build the type that don't explode. link
schrieb am 19. Juni 2025, 20:01 zuletzt editiert vonWe shouldn’t be building rockets PERIOD. They cost too much and are eventually only going to serve trillionaires.
FIX SHIT ON THE GROUND FIRST
That said,
They did a test from 300 meters, sure it’s cool but I think they have a LONG way to go before they are competetive.