AI should absolutely never be allowed in court.
-
schrieb am 8. Mai 2025, 14:32 zuletzt editiert von
AI should absolutely never be allowed in court. Defense is probably stoked about this because it's obviously a mistrial. Judge should be reprimanded for allowing that shit
-
AI should absolutely never be allowed in court. Defense is probably stoked about this because it's obviously a mistrial. Judge should be reprimanded for allowing that shit
schrieb am 8. Mai 2025, 18:26 zuletzt editiert vonAI should absolutely never be allowed in court. Defense is probably stoked about this because it’s obviously a mistrial. Judge should be reprimanded for allowing that shit
You didn't read the article.
This isn't grounds for a mistrial, the trial was already over. This happened during the sentencing phase. The defense didn't object to the statements.
From the article:
Jessica Gattuso, the victim’s right attorney that worked with Pelkey’s family, told 404 Media that Arizona’s laws made the AI testimony possible. “We have a victim’s bill of rights,” she said. “[Victims] have the discretion to pick what format they’d like to give the statement. So I didn’t see any issues with the AI and there was no objection. I don’t believe anyone thought there was an issue with it.”
-
AI should absolutely never be allowed in court. Defense is probably stoked about this because it’s obviously a mistrial. Judge should be reprimanded for allowing that shit
You didn't read the article.
This isn't grounds for a mistrial, the trial was already over. This happened during the sentencing phase. The defense didn't object to the statements.
From the article:
Jessica Gattuso, the victim’s right attorney that worked with Pelkey’s family, told 404 Media that Arizona’s laws made the AI testimony possible. “We have a victim’s bill of rights,” she said. “[Victims] have the discretion to pick what format they’d like to give the statement. So I didn’t see any issues with the AI and there was no objection. I don’t believe anyone thought there was an issue with it.”
schrieb am 8. Mai 2025, 20:14 zuletzt editiert vonIt happened BEFORE sentencing
-
It happened BEFORE sentencing
schrieb am 8. Mai 2025, 22:17 zuletzt editiert vonIn the US criminal justice system, Sentencing happens after the Trial. A mistrial requires rules to be violated during the Trial.
Also, there were at least 3 people in that room that both have a Juris Doctor and know the Arizona Court Rules , one of them is representing the defendant. Not a single one of them had any objections about allowing this statement to be made.
-
In the US criminal justice system, Sentencing happens after the Trial. A mistrial requires rules to be violated during the Trial.
Also, there were at least 3 people in that room that both have a Juris Doctor and know the Arizona Court Rules, one of them is representing the defendant. Not a single one of them had any objections about allowing this statement to be made.
schrieb am 9. Mai 2025, 16:01 zuletzt editiert vonEvery single one of those people should have their licenses suspended. AI, which is inherently a misrepresentation of truth, belongs nowhere near a courtroom. They should legitimately be ashamed of themselves for allowing such an abortion into a courtroom
-
'This Verdict Is a Wake-Up Call:' Jury Trial Finds Meta Breached State Privacy Law in Class Action Against Fertility App | Law.com
Technology vor 12 Stunden1
-
Man Gives Himself 19th Century Psychiatric Illness After Consulting With ChatGPT
Technology vor 16 Stunden1
-
Microsoft no longer permits local Windows 10 accounts if you want Consumer Extended Security Updates — support beyond EOL requires a Microsoft Account link-up even if you pay $30
Technology vor 17 Stunden1
-
-
-
European Commission has a "Wifi4EU" initative, provides 93k high-speed private access points across the EU, free of charge.
Technology vor etwa einem Tag1
-
-