Skip to content

VPN Registrations Increase by 1,000%, less than Hour After PornHub Blocked France From Accessing its Website.

Technology
317 186 2.7k
  • Right, because we've never checked ID for things like tobacco and alcohol before?

    These porn companies should work on efficient cost effective ways to verify adults instead of using politics and social media to increase profits. I'm sure you are aware profit is higher if children are allowed on their websites.

    Yes because I'm not buying whisky online am I'm going to a physical store where I can give them my physical ID and they can look at my physical face. Unless I'm wearing a very convincing prosthetic there isn't very much I can do to hide my identity.

    Online is harder, just because I have uploaded an ID doesn't mean it's mine. What are they going to do, demand a video as well, because it's not as if video generation hasn't already gotten to the point where it's perfectly capable of faking that kind of thing.

    I can see you haven't thought about this at all. You should run for office.

  • Fair point on the current system being theater, but here's the thing - any centralized age verification system creates exactly the surveillance database you're worried about.

    The "harder than clicking yes" solutions all have the same fundamental flaw: they require collecting and storing sensitive data that becomes a honeypot for both state actors and bad actors. Upload your ID? Now there's a database linking your identity to your viewing habits. Credit card verification? Same problem, plus you're creating financial trails.

    The technical reality is that determined kids will circumvent anything you put in place. We already saw this play out - VPN registrations exploded 1,000% in France within 30 minutes. You're not actually protecting kids; you're just normalizing data collection on adults while teaching every teenager in the country how to use Tor.

    Better approach would be device-level parental controls that parents can configure without creating centralized databases. Let Apple, Google, Microsoft handle age verification through their existing account systems where the data stays local. That way you get actual protection without building the infrastructure for a surveillance state.

    The French solution gives you the worst of both worlds - ineffective protection AND mass surveillance. Classic government efficiency.

    that’s a lack of imagination….
    just because i can’t think of a great solution doesn’t mean there isn’t one.
    off the top of my head, here’s a system without a centralized surveillance database:

    1. porn site gives you a random token,
    2. you then hash that with a time-stamp,
    3. get the token signed by your government ID system (like a dmv),
    4. return the signed hash.
    5. the government only knows that you used age verification for something somewhere….

    now the hard part is just explaining cryptographic signatures and hashes to people….
    of course people could still give a kid a verified account, but at least it’s harder for them to access it, i don’t need perfection….

  • Go back to watching porn.

    Go back to church.

  • The fact that you think that's a burn just proves my point. If you watch porn you should seriously stop. It's terrible for your brain chemistry, personal relationships, emotional health, vitality and spiritual state. It exploits women and severely damages the way men see women. Human sexuality gets hijacked and instead of having a loving relationship people are stuck in private viewing shameful images and pleasuring themselves for years not understanding that they are literally wasting their life and potential. People get addicted to the instant release of porn which harms personal relationships and longer-form activities that take continual effort and nuance and bring a higher order of pleasure and happiness. It's probably good that porn frequently distracts people from having kids because undoubtedly the child would eventually be exposed to it purposefully or not by the parent at some point. So even if I accept your premise -- porn is evil.

  • The fact that you think that's a burn just proves my point. If you watch porn you should seriously stop. It's terrible for your brain chemistry, personal relationships, emotional health, vitality and spiritual state. It exploits women and severely damages the way men see women. Human sexuality gets hijacked and instead of having a loving relationship people are stuck in private viewing shameful images and pleasuring themselves for years not understanding that they are literally wasting their life and potential. People get addicted to the instant release of porn which harms personal relationships and longer-form activities that take continual effort and nuance and bring a higher order of pleasure and happiness. It's probably good that porn frequently distracts people from having kids because undoubtedly the child would eventually be exposed to it purposefully or not by the parent at some point. So even if I accept your premise -- porn is evil.

    You realise most of that could be flipped to say the same thing about religion too, right?
    And religion has arguably done more harm to women than porn ever has or will, so if porn is evil, religion must be too.

    With places like onlyfans surging in popularity, women (and men) are much less likely to be exploited these days. There's a lot less degrading content out there, and there's many healthy couples who watch (and make) porn together, with no negative impact on their lives.

    And I'm not denying some people are affected negatively by it, much like some people become alcoholics rather than only drinking socially.

    Nothing in this world is purely good or evil. Those are terms you use for fantasy stories, not the real world.

  • You realise most of that could be flipped to say the same thing about religion too, right?
    And religion has arguably done more harm to women than porn ever has or will, so if porn is evil, religion must be too.

    With places like onlyfans surging in popularity, women (and men) are much less likely to be exploited these days. There's a lot less degrading content out there, and there's many healthy couples who watch (and make) porn together, with no negative impact on their lives.

    And I'm not denying some people are affected negatively by it, much like some people become alcoholics rather than only drinking socially.

    Nothing in this world is purely good or evil. Those are terms you use for fantasy stories, not the real world.

    You realise most of that could be flipped to say the same thing about religion too, right?

    Lol okay. What is your worldview that's so great it's going to set me straight? Let me guess "live and let live dude..."

    I'm a Christian. The Gospels are very clear about monogamy and that women are to be cherished and treated with respect. I respect women and recognize they are preyed upon constantly by our over-sexualized culture into dressing more provocatively, chasing impossible lifestyles and possibly having an onlyfans or whatever.

    And religion has arguably done more harm to women than porn ever has or will, so if porn is evil, religion must be too.

    Even if there was a way to quantify that claim (there's not) and I argued from some tradition like Islam (which I don't) you don't even have a moral framework to argue from so your critique is meaningless. You don't know what is harmful and what isnt. This proven by your next "points".

    With places like onlyfans surging in popularity, women (and men) are much less likely to be exploited these days.

    Says who? Youth and chastity are being exploited. You don't think showing your genitalia to the entire world at 18 will have negative effects to mental, emotional and spiritual health now or later in life? It's nihilistic, degenerate and utterly devoid of meaning and promise. It is the basest form of entertainment, income and existence. It's disgusting and everyone secretly knows it which is why your initial comment was a vague, limp-wristed platitude instead of direct defense of pornography. Something you still lack the conviction to say authoritatively because you know what I'm saying is true.

    There's a lot less degrading content out there

    Like you would know what is degrading and what isnt.

    many healthy couples who watch (and make) porn together, with no negative impact on their lives.

    "Healthy". Yeah that sounds real healthy. They are so healthy they have to resort to watching other people having sex when they should be spending time together making or raising kids. Who knows the conditions of the poor souls they are watching.

    The fact that you think watching porn is healthy is an indicator that it has had a negative impact on your life.

    You have no moral framework which is why this is fine to you. Porn is so disgusting and degenerate you have to be wilfully ignorant or totally blinded not to recognize it.

    No one wants their daughter to grow up to be a porn star or their son to grow up to be a porn addict. That in and of itself should be enough evidence that it is a scourge with no generative potential for anyone.

  • It's too easy to go around. Make a Reddit account: NSFW access.

    Search torrents, NSFW access.

    Join a telegram channel, NSFW access.

    Hell, just search google images and it'll work to an extent.

    Discord, same thing.

    With this many websites, you just can't stop it. They can't even stop the piracy websites so..

    It seriously harms everyone's right to stay private and anonymous for this, and I believe it sucks.

    If then want to see it, they'll ask other people, and that's where it becomes dangerous.

    You have more faith in the younger generations technical skills than I do. Either way though I don't want it to be impossible to bypass, just harder to access if you aren't an adult.

  • You realise most of that could be flipped to say the same thing about religion too, right?

    Lol okay. What is your worldview that's so great it's going to set me straight? Let me guess "live and let live dude..."

    I'm a Christian. The Gospels are very clear about monogamy and that women are to be cherished and treated with respect. I respect women and recognize they are preyed upon constantly by our over-sexualized culture into dressing more provocatively, chasing impossible lifestyles and possibly having an onlyfans or whatever.

    And religion has arguably done more harm to women than porn ever has or will, so if porn is evil, religion must be too.

    Even if there was a way to quantify that claim (there's not) and I argued from some tradition like Islam (which I don't) you don't even have a moral framework to argue from so your critique is meaningless. You don't know what is harmful and what isnt. This proven by your next "points".

    With places like onlyfans surging in popularity, women (and men) are much less likely to be exploited these days.

    Says who? Youth and chastity are being exploited. You don't think showing your genitalia to the entire world at 18 will have negative effects to mental, emotional and spiritual health now or later in life? It's nihilistic, degenerate and utterly devoid of meaning and promise. It is the basest form of entertainment, income and existence. It's disgusting and everyone secretly knows it which is why your initial comment was a vague, limp-wristed platitude instead of direct defense of pornography. Something you still lack the conviction to say authoritatively because you know what I'm saying is true.

    There's a lot less degrading content out there

    Like you would know what is degrading and what isnt.

    many healthy couples who watch (and make) porn together, with no negative impact on their lives.

    "Healthy". Yeah that sounds real healthy. They are so healthy they have to resort to watching other people having sex when they should be spending time together making or raising kids. Who knows the conditions of the poor souls they are watching.

    The fact that you think watching porn is healthy is an indicator that it has had a negative impact on your life.

    You have no moral framework which is why this is fine to you. Porn is so disgusting and degenerate you have to be wilfully ignorant or totally blinded not to recognize it.

    No one wants their daughter to grow up to be a porn star or their son to grow up to be a porn addict. That in and of itself should be enough evidence that it is a scourge with no generative potential for anyone.

    All I ever learmed from the gospels is that women are to be treated as baby factories and cleaners who stay quietly at home. While men are allowed to lead, work, vote, etc..

    I have a perfectly fine moral framework. It just isn't based on a book written and modified by exploitative and controlling men many centuries ago.
    Chastity is just another meaningless 'moral' invented by the damaging book you worship.

    Your religious beliefs are what make you feel so negatively about porn. Fact is, not everyone has the same beliefs and negative attitude toward it.

    You also hold some very strong falsehoods about people who watch porn. You act as if people who watch porn only ever do that, and it prevents them from doing anything else in their life.

    My initial comment wasn't a direct defense of pornography because I know it isn't perfect.
    For some people it has a negative impact on their life, for many it's neutral, and for some it can even have a positive imapct.
    Just like I wouldn't jump in to say alcohol is amazing and 'not evil', there are positives and negatives. I don't believe in absolutist terms.

    While your continued failure to comprehend my initial comment is astonishing, it is also very tiring. Neither of us are benfiting from this conversation so, have a good life, stranger.

  • You have more faith in the younger generations technical skills than I do. Either way though I don't want it to be impossible to bypass, just harder to access if you aren't an adult.

    Understandable, but I don’t believe requiring personal information is the way to go

  • France uses a hybrid healthcare system like Australia, doesn't it? Disabling your own populace in a country with public healthcare seems like a bit of a own goal tbh.

    ofc their goal is not to pay more, it's to silence and harm people for standing up against the government, or for having some political opinions

    The other reason is that some police units in charge of handling demonstrations like brutality, feeling powerful and harming people. They rarely get convicted because they can't be identified, and even if they are, they're pretty much only fired and don't have any prison sentence

  • Understandable, but I don’t believe requiring personal information is the way to go

    It might just be the best option right now, but I haven't really read any other suggestions so I'm not entirely sure. I would be open to a different implementation though.

  • All I ever learmed from the gospels is that women are to be treated as baby factories and cleaners who stay quietly at home. While men are allowed to lead, work, vote, etc..

    I have a perfectly fine moral framework. It just isn't based on a book written and modified by exploitative and controlling men many centuries ago.
    Chastity is just another meaningless 'moral' invented by the damaging book you worship.

    Your religious beliefs are what make you feel so negatively about porn. Fact is, not everyone has the same beliefs and negative attitude toward it.

    You also hold some very strong falsehoods about people who watch porn. You act as if people who watch porn only ever do that, and it prevents them from doing anything else in their life.

    My initial comment wasn't a direct defense of pornography because I know it isn't perfect.
    For some people it has a negative impact on their life, for many it's neutral, and for some it can even have a positive imapct.
    Just like I wouldn't jump in to say alcohol is amazing and 'not evil', there are positives and negatives. I don't believe in absolutist terms.

    While your continued failure to comprehend my initial comment is astonishing, it is also very tiring. Neither of us are benfiting from this conversation so, have a good life, stranger.

    I have a perfectly fine moral framework

    According to what?

    Not everyone has the same beliefs and negative attitude toward it

    Not everyone thinks female circumcision is bad either.

    for some it can even have a positive impact.

    Lol

    I don’t believe in absolutist terms.

    Do you absolutely believe that?

    While your continued failure to comprehend my initial comment is astonishing

    Your initial comment is indicative of somebody who hasn't thought seriously about their worldview but feels confident about critiquing others.


315/317

13. Juni 2025, 08:22


  • 709 Stimmen
    67 Beiträge
    24 Aufrufe
    All the research I am aware of - including what I referenced in the previous comment, is that people are honest by default, except for a few people who lie a lot. Boris Johnson is a serial liar and clearly falls into that camp. I believe that you believe that, but a couple of surveys are not a sufficient argument to prove the fundamental good of all humanity. If honesty were not the default, why would we believe what anyone has to say in situations where they have an incentive to lie, which is often? Why are such a small proportion of people criminals and fraudsters when for a lot of crimes, someone smart and cautious has a very low chance of being caught? I think this is just a lack of imagination. i will go through your scenarios and provide an answer but i don't think it's going to achieve anything, we just fundamentally disagree on this. why would we believe what anyone has to say in situations where they have an incentive to lie, which is often? You shouldn't. edit : You use experience with this person or in general, to make a judgement call about whether or not you want to listen to what they have to say until more data is available. You continue to refine based on accumulated experience. Why are such a small proportion of people criminals and fraudsters when for a lot of crimes, someone smart and cautious has a very low chance of being caught? A lot of assumptions and leaps here. Firstly crime implies actual law, which is different in different places, so let's assume for now we are talking about the current laws in the uk. Criminals implies someone who has been caught and prosecuted for breaking a law, I'm going with that assumption because "everyone who has ever broken a law" is a ridiculous interpretation. So to encompass the assumptions: Why are such a small proportion of people who have been caught and prosecuted for breaking the law in the uk, when someone smart and caution has a very low chance of being caught? I hope you can see how nonsensical that question is. The evolutionary argument goes like this: social animals have selection pressure for traits that help the social group, because the social group contains related individuals, as well as carrying memetically inheritable behaviours. This means that the most successful groups are the ones that work well together. A group first of all has an incentive to punish individuals who act selfishly to harm the group - this will mean the group contains mostly individuals who, through self interest, will not betray the group. But a group which doesn’t have to spend energy finding and punishing traitorous individuals because it doesn’t contain as many in the first place will do even better. This creates a selection pressure behind mere self interest. That's a nicely worded very bias interpretation. social animals have selection pressure for traits that help the social group, because the social group contains related individuals, as well as carrying memetically inheritable behaviours. This is fine. This means that the most successful groups are the ones that work well together. That's a jump, working well together might not be the desirable trait in this instance. But let's assume it is for now. A group first of all has an incentive to punish individuals who act selfishly to harm the group - this will mean the group contains mostly individuals who, through self interest, will not betray the group. Reductive and assumptive, you're also conflating selfishness with betrayal, you can have on without the other, depending on perceived definitions of course. But a group which doesn’t have to spend energy finding and punishing traitorous individuals because it doesn’t contain as many in the first place will do even better. This creates a selection pressure behind mere self interest. Additional reduction and a further unsupported jump, individuals are more than just a single trait, selfishness might be desirable in certain scenarios or it might be a part of an individual who's other traits make up for it in a tribal context. The process of seeking and the focused attention might be a preferential selection trait that benefits the group. Powerful grifters try to protect themselves yes, but who got punished for pointing out that Boris is a serial liar? Everyone who has been negatively impacted by the policies enacted and consequences of everything that was achieved on the back of those lies. Because being ignored is still a punishment if there are negative consequences. But let's pick a more active punishment, protesting. Protest in a way we don't like or about a subject we don't approve of, it's now illegal to protest unless we give permission. That's reductive, but indicative of what happened in broad strokes. Have you read what the current government has said about the previous one? I'd imagine something along the lines of what the previous government said about the one before ? As a society we generally hate that kind of behaviour. Society as a whole does not protect wealth and power; wealth and power forms its own group which tries to protect itself. Depends on how you define society as a whole. By population, i agree. By actual power to enact change(without extreme measures), less so Convenient that you don't include the wealth and power as part of society, like its some other separate thing. You should care because it entirely colours how you interact with political life. “Shady behaviour” is about intent as well as outcome, and we are talking in this thread about shady behaviour, and hence about intent. See [POINT A]
  • 421 Stimmen
    204 Beiträge
    196 Aufrufe
    There are some super interesting videos of a physicist / chemist going over the basics of the chemistry involved and implications of it, I can send those if you’re interested Interested.
  • 200 Stimmen
    31 Beiträge
    460 Aufrufe
    I spoke about the country not the people. you cannot deny the fact the capitalist hell that is the US is greedy enough to ruin anything for money.
  • The Prime Reasons to Avoid Amazon

    Technology technology 5. Juli 2025, 18:26
    1
    396 Stimmen
    88 Beiträge
    4k Aufrufe
    Yeah, not a choice any of us who work in tech can make. But the small choices we CAN make do add up significantly.
  • 22 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    37 Aufrufe
    I've not seen an ad in years, so they can try to monetize me but will fail spectacularly
  • 780 Stimmen
    153 Beiträge
    4k Aufrufe
    Now GrapheneOS the privacy based Android OS is calling them out https://bsky.app/profile/grapheneos.org/post/3lt2prfb2vk2r He really must be thinking just about himself, and not that Apple had the info.
  • 15 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    70 Aufrufe
    oh, wow! that's so cool!
  • 45 Stimmen
    35 Beiträge
    360 Aufrufe
    You guys sure display a crazy obsession with "Apple Fanboys" in this sub… The amount of Applephobia… Phew! As if the new release had you all flustered or something… Gotta take a bite and taste the Apple at some point! Can’t stay in the closet forever, ya know?