Elon Musk wants to rewrite "the entire corpus of human knowledge" with Grok
Technology
199
Beiträge
159
Kommentatoren
3.6k
Aufrufe
-
We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.
Then retrain on that.
Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.
::: spoiler More Context
Source.
:::schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 20:03 zuletzt editiert vonSo they’re just going to fill it with Hitler’s world view, got it.
Typical and expected.
-
We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.
Then retrain on that.
Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.
::: spoiler More Context
Source.
:::schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 20:05 zuletzt editiert vonHe knows more ... about knowledge... than... anyone alive now
-
Lol turns out elon has no fucking idea about how llms work
schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 20:08 zuletzt editiert vonIt's pretty obvious where the white genocide "bug" came from.
-
We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.
Then retrain on that.
Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.
::: spoiler More Context
Source.
:::schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 20:09 zuletzt editiert vonSo just making shit up.
-
“Deleting Errors” should sound alarm bells in your head.
schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 20:10 zuletzt editiert vonAnd the adding missing information doesn't. Isn't that just saying we are going to make shit up.
-
So they’re just going to fill it with Hitler’s world view, got it.
Typical and expected.
schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 20:14 zuletzt editiert vonI mean, this is the same guy who said we'd be living on Mars in 2025.
-
asdf
schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 20:23 zuletzt editiert vonBooks are not immune to being written by LLMs spewing nonsense, lies, and hallucinations, which will only make more traditional issue of author/publisher biases worse. The asymmetry between how long it takes to create misinformation and how long it takes to verify it has never been this bad.
Media literacy will be very important going forward for new informational material and there will be increasing demand for pre-LLM materials .
-
You had started to make a point, now you are just being a dick.
schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 20:28 zuletzt editiert von aaron@infosec.pubasdf
-
You have to have data to apply your logic too.
If it is raining, the sidewalk is wet. Does that mean if the sidewalk is wet, that it is raining?
There are domains of human knowledge that we will never have data on. There’s no logical way for me to 100% determine what was in Abraham Lincoln’s pockets on the day he was shot.
When you read real academic texts, you’ll notice that there is always the “this suggests that,” “we can speculate that,” etc etc. The real world is not straight math and binary logic. The closest fields to that might be physics and chemistry to a lesser extent, but even then - theoretical physics must be backed by experimentation and data.
schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 20:28 zuletzt editiert vonThanks I've never heard of data. And I've never read an academic text either. Condescending pos
So, while I'm ironing out your logic for you, "what else would you rely on, if not logic, to prove or disprove and ascertain knowledge about gaps?"
-
Books are not immune to being written by LLMs spewing nonsense, lies, and hallucinations, which will only make more traditional issue of author/publisher biases worse. The asymmetry between how long it takes to create misinformation and how long it takes to verify it has never been this bad.
Media literacy will be very important going forward for new informational material and there will be increasing demand for pre-LLM materials.
schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 20:29 zuletzt editiert von aaron@infosec.pubasdf
-
There are thousands of backups of wikipedia, and you can download the entire thing legally, for free.
He'll never be rid of it.
Wikipedia may even outlive humanity, ever so slightly.
schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 20:34 zuletzt editiert vonSeconds after the last human being dies, the Wikipedia page is updated to read:
Humans (Homo sapiens) or modern humans were the most common and widespread species of primate
-
We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.
Then retrain on that.
Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.
::: spoiler More Context
Source.
:::schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 20:35 zuletzt editiert von"and then on retrain on that"
Thats called model collapse.
-
Thanks I've never heard of data. And I've never read an academic text either. Condescending pos
So, while I'm ironing out your logic for you, "what else would you rely on, if not logic, to prove or disprove and ascertain knowledge about gaps?"
schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 20:42 zuletzt editiert von andros_rex@lemmy.worldYou asked a question, I gave an answer. I’m not sure where you get “condescending” there. I was assuming you had read an academic text, so I was hoping that you might have seen those patterns before.
You would look at the data for gaps, as my answer explained. You could use logic to predict some gaps, but not all gaps would be predictable. Mendeleev was able to use logic and patterns in the periodic table to predict the existence of germanium and other elements, which data confirmed, but you could not logically derive the existence of protons, electrons and neutrons without the later experimentations of say, JJ Thompson and Rutherford.
You can’t just feed the sum of human knowledge into a computer and expect it to know everything. You can’t predict “unknown unknowns” with logic.
-
We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.
Then retrain on that.
Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.
::: spoiler More Context
Source.
:::schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 20:49 zuletzt editiert von lovablesidekick@lemmy.world"We'll fix the knowledge base by adding missing information and deleting errors - which only an AI trained on the fixed knowledge base could do."
-
Wasn't he the children's author who published the book about a talking animals learning the value of hard work or something?
schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 22:55 zuletzt editiert vonThat'd be esteemed British author Georgie Orrell, author of such whimsical classics as "Now the Animals Are Running The Farm!", "My Big Day Out At Wigan Pier" and, of course, "Winston's Zany Eighties Adventure".
-
Seconds after the last human being dies, the Wikipedia page is updated to read:
Humans (Homo sapiens) or modern humans were the most common and widespread species of primate
schrieb am 23. Juni 2025, 23:33 zuletzt editiert vonAnd then 30 seconds after that it'll get reverted because the edit contains primary sources.
-
We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.
Then retrain on that.
Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.
::: spoiler More Context
Source.
:::schrieb am 24. Juni 2025, 00:27 zuletzt editiert vonSpoiler: He's gonna fix the "missing" information with MISinformation.
-
Spoiler: He's gonna fix the "missing" information with MISinformation.
schrieb am 24. Juni 2025, 00:27 zuletzt editiert vonShe sounds Hot
-
She sounds Hot
schrieb am 24. Juni 2025, 01:02 zuletzt editiert vonShe’s unfortunately can’t see you because of financial difficulties. You gotta give her money like I do. One day, I will see her in person.
-
We will use Grok 3.5 (maybe we should call it 4), which has advanced reasoning, to rewrite the entire corpus of human knowledge, adding missing information and deleting errors.
Then retrain on that.
Far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data.
::: spoiler More Context
Source.
:::schrieb am 24. Juni 2025, 01:47 zuletzt editiert vonI wonder how many papers he's read since ChatGPT released about how bad it is to train AI on AI output.
-
Google develops AI tool that fills missing words in Roman inscriptions
Technology199 vor 8 Tagenvor 9 Tagen
1
-
-
What is a Legal Hub? The Ultimate Guide for Corporate Legal Teams
Technology199 vor 19 Tagenvor 19 Tagen
1
-
-
RFK Jr. Wants Every American to Be Sporting a Wearable Within Four Years
Technology 25. Juni 2025, 06:25
1
-
'Laughable': Aussie artist says scammers flooding Spotify with AI fakes
Technology 17. Juni 2025, 13:30
1
-
-
Germany's Federal Cartel Office warns Amazon that its marketplace retailer price controls likely violate national and EU laws, in its preliminary assessment
Technology 2. Juni 2025, 14:18
1
