This small charity is making a global impact.

I'm sorry, but that is just a blatant misunderstanding of how economics work. It wouldn't combat blatant consumerism, it would literally destroy the economy. Not to be replaced by something better, but just destroy it. There would be no reason to invest in literally anything, including people, no reason to repair your house or feed the poor, because the money it would cost, would be worth more tomorrow.

Why would I buy a car, or bike, or proper nutritional food, if I could save that money for tomorrow, and buy more? Only tomorrow it's the same thing, so I'll live like shit until the next day, then the next day, and then the next....

The only people who would have any quality of life, would be the rich cunts. They'd live like the do now, because they don't actually need more money.

Deflation is never a good thing, I'm saying this as a socialist.

Yep definitely, it is amazing. It is what BTC should have been.

I believe monero has protections to prevent this. All transactions are secret.

How would secret transactions make a the coin not deflate? The issue is control of the production of the currency. If you can't control it, it's a cointoss wether it'll be infaltionary or deflationary. A lot of inflation is bad, and any deflation is catastrophic, so I'd really rather not leave the economy up to random chance and private entities' willingness to control the production of their shitcoins.

And hypothetically if it won't get broken up because the government works for them and not for us, then we can break the monopoly ourselves.

everything you don’t like

On issues like these, conservatives will discover the magic of actual reasons. It's only "things you don't like" when we're talking about banning hate speech or something.

Lightning

As long as it is legal CC companies should be barred from dictating what products and services their systems cover.

They're not misunderstanding; you're using Keynesian economics. "The economy" as described today is rich people's wealth, not the wellbeing of the poor.

If people saved instead of building up credit scores, it would be much easier to strike. We don't need to be forced to invest somehow or become even poorer (which is what actually happened). You'll repair your house because you need a house and buy food because you need food. You're more likely to participate in mutual aid with savings than with credit.

What about ism. You’re that person.

While the pressure on the credit card companies should still work due to conversations behind closed doors, my understanding is that those companies are not actually payment processors. Payment processors are a bunch of companies/banks, some you likely haven't heard of (one is PayPal though, feel free to make your voice heard to them), and they are taking legal responsibility for the transactions themselves, and thus actually have incentive to police transactions. Credit card companies themselves, not having those legal liabilities, would much rather people just spent their money everywhere as long as there was low risk of cards being stolen or misused.

Mass emailed didn’t exist in 1969 nor in 1985.

Wherever you went to school, those teachers should be shot.

Didn't he invest in Dogecoin?

Cognitive dissonance, naturally.

Who's behind this sudden wave of age verification bullshit, Schrödinger's parents? The ones who shove an iPad in front of their 2 year old and berate school teachers for not being poorly paid babysitters who raise their kids for them? And yet they claim to care SO MUCH about the well being of children that they push these obscene and draconian policies on the rest of us? What a bunch of fucking hypocrites, but that's typical for conservatives.

It actually explained a phenomenon I'd noticed but couldn't figure out. Adult sites have tons of 'Step' porn but if you go to a site like Reddit (not saying go to reddit), you'll find lots of regular wincest caption forums.

I couldn't figure out why.

Reddit tucks those wincest communities behind their nsfw wall. So advertisers still pay them and users have their space.

This is also true for non-con content. Fake non-con is basically scrubbed from porn sites. They ban most associated keywords even though you still see videos with dubious consent as a major theme.

I'm curious to see if that holds true as reddit monetizes more.

It is, did I write something wrong which negates that?

They're still going after books too. Any and all media, speech, any kind of communication, which is free from their clawing grasp.

Whoah whoah whoah! They need to keep that cash in a wallet, don't wave it around, look out for pickpockets, don't carry too much, and a slew of other common sense things that I won't list now but will mock you for not doing later.