Skip to content

An Alabama City Recommends Changing Its Laws to Accommodate One of the Country’s Largest Proposed Data Centers

Technology
4 4 0
  • 25 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    roofuskit@lemmy.worldR
    At least the AI doesn't mean to lie to you, unlike the intention of the rest of the site.
  • 29% of adults couldn't go hour without internet - survey

    Technology technology
    18
    1
    67 Stimmen
    18 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    saltsong@startrek.websiteS
    Because we don't want them doing surge pricing.
  • Why so much hate toward AI?

    Technology technology
    73
    38 Stimmen
    73 Beiträge
    5 Aufrufe
    H
    AI has only one problem to solve: salaries
  • 19 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 124 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    T
    Premium supported. You get plenty with the free tier, but you get lots more with paid.
  • 4 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    guydudeman@lemmy.worldG
    Yeah, I don’t know how they’re doing it. They’re using some “zero trust” system. It’s beyond me.
  • 37 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • CrowdStrike Announces Layoffs Affecting 500 Employees

    Technology technology
    8
    1
    243 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    5 Aufrufe
    S
    This is where the magic of near meaningless corpo-babble comes in. The layoffs are part of a plan to aspirationally acheive the goal of $10b revenue by EoY 2025. What they are actually doing is a significant restructuring of the company, refocusing by outside hiring some amount of new people to lead or be a part of departments or positions that haven't existed before, or are being refocused to other priorities... ... But this process also involves laying off 500 of the 'least productive' or 'least mission critical' employees. So, technically, they can, and are, arguing that their new organizational paradigm will be so succesful that it actually will result in increased revenue, not just lower expenses. Generally corpos call this something like 'right-sizing' or 'refocusing' or something like that. ... But of course... anyone with any actual experience with working at a place that does this... will tell you roughly this is what happens: Turns out all those 'grunts' you let go of, well they actually do a lot more work in a bunch of weird, esoteric, bandaid solutions to keep everything going, than upper management was aware of... because middle management doesn't acknowledge or often even understand that that work was being done, because they are generally self-aggrandizing narcissist petty tyrants who spend more time in meetings fluffing themselves up than actually doing any useful management. Then, also, you are now bringing on new, outside people who look great on paper, to lead new or modified apartments... but they of course also do not have any institutional knowledge, as they are new. So now, you have a whole bunch of undocumented work that was being done, processes which were being followed... which is no longer being done, which is not documented.... and the new guys, even if they have the best intentions, now have to spend a quarter or two or three figuring out just exactly how much pre-existing middle management has been bullshitting about, figuring out just how much things do not actually function as they ssid it did... So now your efficiency improving restructuring is actually a chaotic mess. ... Now, this 'right sizing' is not always apocalyptically extremely bad, but it is also essentially never totally free from hiccups... and it increases stress, workload, and tensions between basically everyone at the company, to some extent. Here's Forbes explanation of this phenomenon, if you prefer an explanation of right sizing in corpospeak: https://www.forbes.com/advisor/business/rightsizing/