Skip to content

Elon Musk wants to rewrite "the entire corpus of human knowledge" with Grok

Technology
139 115 0
  • Resurrecting a dead torrent tracker and finding 3 million peers

    Technology technology
    57
    321 Stimmen
    57 Beiträge
    5 Aufrufe
    G
    [image: b2c65740-fc22-437d-a27a-22129d68f194.jpeg]
  • XMPP vs everything else

    Technology technology
    10
    1
    44 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    M
    Conversely, I have seen this opinion expressed a few times. I can’t judge the accuracy but there seem to be more than a few people sharing it.
  • What Happens If an Asteroid Heads for Earth?

    Technology technology
    13
    1
    34 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    5 Aufrufe
    M
    Well, shi
  • 10 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • An earnest question about the AI/LLM hate

    Technology technology
    57
    73 Stimmen
    57 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    ineedmana@lemmy.worldI
    It might be interesting to cross-post this question to !fuck_ai@lemmy.world but brace for impact
  • How the US is turning into a mass techno-surveillance state

    Technology technology
    66
    1
    484 Stimmen
    66 Beiträge
    20 Aufrufe
    D
    Are these people retarded? Did they forget Edward Snowden?
  • AI cheating surge pushes schools into chaos

    Technology technology
    25
    45 Stimmen
    25 Beiträge
    6 Aufrufe
    C
    Sorry for the late reply, I had to sit and think on this one for a little bit. I think there are would be a few things going on when it comes to designing a course to teach critical thinking, nuances, and originality; and they each have their own requirements. For critical thinking: The main goal is to provide students with a toolbelt for solving various problems. Then instilling the habit of always asking "does this match the expected outcome? What was I expecting?". So usually courses will be setup so students learn about a tool, practice using the tool, then have a culminating assignment on using all the tools. Ideally, the problems students face at the end require multiple tools to solve. Nuance mainly naturally comes with exposure to the material from a professional - The way a mechanical engineer may describe building a desk will probably differ greatly compared to a fantasy author. You can also explain definitions and industry standards; but thats really dry. So I try to teach nuances via definitions by mixing in the weird nuances as much as possible with jokes. Then for originality; I've realized I dont actually look for an original idea; but something creative. In a classroom setting, you're usually learning new things about a subject so a student's knowledge of that space is usually very limited. Thus, an idea that they've never heard about may be original to them, but common for an industry expert. For teaching originality creativity, I usually provide time to be creative & think, and provide open ended questions as prompts to explore ideas. My courses that require originality usually have it as a part of the culminating assignment at the end where they can apply their knowledge. I'll also add in time where students can come to me with preliminary ideas and I can provide feedback on whether or not it passes the creative threshold. Not all ideas are original, but I sometimes give a bit of slack if its creative enough. The amount of course overhauling to get around AI really depends on the material being taught. For example, in programming - you teach critical thinking by always testing your code, even with parameters that don't make sense. For example: Try to add 123 + "skibbidy", and see what the program does.
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet