Skip to content

Say Hello to the World's Largest Hard Drive, a Massive 36TB Seagate

Technology
253 155 12
  • 9 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    28 Aufrufe
    A
    “Mysterious”? It’s eight there in the name.
  • Right to Repair Gains Traction as John Deere Faces Trial

    Technology technology
    30
    1
    621 Stimmen
    30 Beiträge
    129 Aufrufe
    R
    Run the Jewels?
  • 311 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    165 Aufrufe
    S
    Same, especially when searching technical or niche topics. Since there aren't a ton of results specific to the topic, mostly semi-related results will appear in the first page or two of a regular (non-Gemini) Google search, just due to the higher popularity of those webpages compared to the relevant webpages. Even the relevant webpages will have lots of non-relevant or semi-relevant information surrounding the answer I'm looking for. I don't know enough about it to be sure, but Gemini is probably just scraping a handful of websites on the first page, and since most of those are only semi-related, the resulting summary is a classic example of garbage in, garbage out. I also think there's probably something in the code that looks for information that is shared across multiple sources and prioritizing that over something that's only on one particular page (possibly the sole result with the information you need). Then, it phrases the summary as a direct answer to your query, misrepresenting the actual information on the pages they scraped. At least Gemini gives sources, I guess. The thing that gets on my nerves the most is how often I see people quote the summary as proof of something without checking the sources. It was bad before the rollout of Gemini, but at least back then Google was mostly scraping text and presenting it with little modification, along with a direct link to the webpage. Now, it's an LLM generating text phrased as a direct answer to a question (that was also AI-generated from your search query) using AI-summarized data points scraped from multiple webpages. It's obfuscating the source material further, but I also can't help but feel like it exposes a little of the behind-the-scenes fuckery Google has been doing for years before Gemini. How it bastardizes your query by interpreting it into a question, and then prioritizes homogeneous results that agree on the "answer" to your "question". For years they've been doing this to a certain extent, they just didn't share how they interpreted your query.
  • 131 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    41 Aufrufe
    P
    This is a tough one for me: I'm opposed to femicide, but I only wish the absolute worst on influencers.
  • 74 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    55 Aufrufe
    C
    Time to start chopping down flock cameras.
  • Microsoft Teams will soon block screen capture during meetings

    Technology technology
    43
    305 Stimmen
    43 Beiträge
    180 Aufrufe
    D
    No but, you can just close it.
  • Bill Gates to give away 99% of his wealth in the next 20 years

    Technology technology
    21
    150 Stimmen
    21 Beiträge
    105 Aufrufe
    G
    hehehehe You know, it's hilarious that you say that. Nobody ever realizes that they're talking to a starving homeless person on the internet when they meet one, do they? Believe it or not, quite a few of us do have jobs. Not all of us are disabled or addicted. That is the problem with the society we live in. We're invisible until we talk to you.
  • Instacart CEO Fidji Simo is joining OpenAI as CEO of Applications

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    20 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    20 Aufrufe
    paraphrand@lemmy.worldP
    overseeing product development for Facebook Video So she’s the one who oversaw the misleading Facebook Video numbers that destroyed a whole swath of websites?