Skip to content

The IRS Tax Filing Software TurboTax Is Trying to Kill Just Got Open Sourced

Technology
145 79 46
  • 305 Stimmen
    61 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    G
    What happens if someone is illegitimately removed from this database? That the someone cannot vote. But you can design system resilient to this. How can you show whether it was a glitch, or deliberate? Paper trail. How do you know if the information they have about you is even right, or get it changed if you need to? You check it. I mean, when I ask for a document I expect to receive it. And I check if it is correct, after all human error can happen anyway. Where’s the accountability? Every document from the state (any level) I have has a signature that indicate who is ultimately accountable for it.
  • In Militarizing Push, Russian School Children To Build Drones

    Technology technology
    37
    1
    263 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    18 Aufrufe
    Z
    https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/tu-quoque
  • Do you remember Windows 95? How about Windows 96?

    Technology technology
    32
    77 Stimmen
    32 Beiträge
    30 Aufrufe
    M
    Ha, thanks for searching!
  • 17 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    brewchin@lemmy.worldB
    Inevitable, really. And zero surprise it's coming out of China.
  • The Trump Mobile T1 Phone looks both bad and impossible

    Technology technology
    42
    1
    139 Stimmen
    42 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    S
    "Components" means in this case the phone and the sticker.
  • For All That Is Good About Humankind, Ban Smartphones

    Technology technology
    89
    1
    131 Stimmen
    89 Beiträge
    29 Aufrufe
    D
    Appreciated, but do you think the authorities want to win the war on drugs?
  • 85 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zoneC
    i like how ask photos is not just a dumb idea but it's also a dumb name
  • Microsoft Bans Employees From Using DeepSeek App

    Technology technology
    11
    1
    121 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    L
    (Premise - suppose I accept that there is such a definable thing as capitalism) I'm not sure why you feel the need to state this in a discussion that already assumes it as a necessary precondition of, but, uh, you do you. People blaming capitalism for everything then build a country that imports grain, while before them and after them it’s among the largest exporters on the planet (if we combine Russia and Ukraine for the “after” metric, no pun intended). ...what? What does this have to do with literally anything, much less my comment about innovation/competition? Even setting aside the wild-assed assumptions you're making about me criticizing capitalism means I 'blame [it] for everything', this tirade you've launched into, presumably about Ukraine and the USSR, has no bearing on anything even tangentially related to this conversation. People praising capitalism create conditions in which there’s no reason to praise it. Like, it’s competitive - they kill competitiveness with patents, IP, very complex legal systems. It’s self-regulating and self-optimizing - they make regulations and do bailouts preventing sick companies from dying, make laws after their interests, then reactively make regulations to make conditions with them existing bearable, which have a side effect of killing smaller companies. Please allow me to reiterate: ...what? Capitalists didn't build literally any of those things, governments did, and capitalists have been trying to escape, subvert, or dismantle those systems at every turn, so this... vain, confusing attempt to pin a medal on capitalism's chest for restraining itself is not only wrong, it fails to understand basic facts about history. It's the opposite of self-regulating because it actively seeks to dismantle regulations (environmental, labor, wage, etc), and the only thing it optimizes for is the wealth of oligarchs, and maybe if they're lucky, there will be a few crumbs left over for their simps. That’s the problem, both “socialist” and “capitalist” ideal systems ignore ape power dynamics. I'm going to go ahead an assume that 'the problem' has more to do with assuming that complex interacting systems can be simplified to 'ape (or any other animal's) power dynamics' than with failing to let the richest people just do whatever they want. Such systems should be designed on top of the fact that jungle law is always allowed So we should just be cool with everybody being poor so Jeff Bezos or whoever can upgrade his megayacht to a gigayacht or whatever? Let me say this in the politest way I know how: LOL no. Also, do you remember when I said this? ‘Won’t someone please think of the billionaires’ is wearing kinda thin You know, right before you went on this very long-winded, surreal, barely-coherent ramble? Did you imagine I would be convinced by literally any of it when all it amounts to is one giant, extraneous, tedious equivalent of 'Won't someone please think of the billionaires?' Simp harder and I bet maybe you can get a crumb or two yourself.