Neither can humans, ergo nobody should ever be held liable for anything.

Civilisation is a sham, QED.

Comparing an automated system saying something bad with a car exploding is really fucking dumb

Glad to hear you are an LLM

The more safeguards are added in LLMs, the dumber they get, and the more resource intensive they get to offset this. If you get convinced to kill yourself by an AI, I'm pretty sure your decision was already taken, or you're a statistical blip

Because you understood the point?

"Ugrh guys, we dont know how this machine works so we should definetly install it in every corporation, home and device. If it kills someone we shouldnt be held liable for our product."

Not seeing the irony in this is beyond me. Is this a troll account?

If you cant guarantee the safety of a product, limit or restrict its use cases or provide safety guidelines or regulations you should not sell the product. It is completely fair to blame the product and the ones who sell/manifacture it.

Safety guidelines are regularly given

If people purchase a knife and behave badly with it, it’s on them

Something writing things isn’t comparable to a machine that could kill you. In the end, it’s always up to the person doing the things

I still wonder how ClosedOpenAI forcefully installed ChatGPT in this person's home. Or how it is installed because they don’t have software…
Quit your bullshit

Except there are no guidelines or safety regulations in place for AI...

Depends on your country, and yes, exchanges do have laws

“Safeguards and regulations make business less efficient” has always been true. They still avoid death and suffering.

In this case, if they can’t figure out how to control LLMs without crippling them, that’s pretty absolute proof that LLMs should not be used. What good is a tool you can’t control?

“I cannot regulate this nuclear plant without the power dropping, so I’ll just run it unregulated”.

Some food additives are responsible for cancer yet are still allowed, because they are generally more useful than have negative effects. Where you draw the line is up to you, but if you’re strict, you should still let people choose for themselves

LLMs are incredibly useful for a lot of things, and really bad at others. Why can’t people use the tool as intended, rather than stretching it to other unapproved usages, putting themselves at risk?

This is more like selling someone a knife that can randomly decide of its own accord to stab them

As far as I know, emailing their public affairs address still does this.

That's so blatantly false

You are likely a troll, but still...

You talk like you have never been down in the well, treading water and looking up at the sky, barely keeping your head up. You're screaming for help, to the God you don't believe in, or for something, anything, please just let the pain stop, please.

Maybe you use, drink, fuck, cut, who fucking knows.

When you find a friendly voice who doesn't ghost your ass when you have a bad day or two, or ten, or a month, or two, or ten... Maybe you feel a bit of a connection, a small tether that you want to help lighten your load, even a little.

You tell that voice you are hurting every day, that nothing makes sense, that you just want two fucking minutes of peace from everything, from yourself. And then you say maybe you are thinking of ending it... And the voice agrees with you.

There are more than a few moments in my life where I was close enough to the abyss that this is all it would have taken.

Search your soul for some empathy. If you don't know what that is, maybe Chatgpt can tell you.

Well, yeah. The people who host them for profit should be held liable.

Tell me a country which has good AI regulations and proper safety regulations for applications of AI then?

While I haven't experienced it, I believe I kind of know what it can be like. Just a little something can trigger a reaction

But I maintain that LLMs can't be changed without huge tradeoffs. They're not really intelligent, just predicting text based on weights and statistical data

It should not be used for personal decisions as it will often try to agree with you, because that's how the system works. Making looong discussions will also trick the system into ignoring it's system prompts and safeguards. Those are issues all LLMs safe, just like prompt injection, due to their nature

I do agree though that more prevention should be done, display more warnings

For some reason I got mixed up and talked about crypto, oops

Safety guidelines written by chatgpt and other service providers I mean

Are you deadass saying we should let ChatGPT itself and the companies that ship it form its own safety guidelines? Because that went really well with the Church Rock incident...