Skip to content

Trump Mobile launches $47 service and a gold phone

Technology
129 103 395
  • (LLM) A language model built for the public good

    Technology technology
    14
    1
    124 Stimmen
    14 Beiträge
    6 Aufrufe
    T
    No you rude fuck. If i ask a simple question about a subject, let's say foraging as a I do that a lot. And it's wrong, it's friggin wrong. I'll ask about a specific plant. Full disclosure this is one of my things. 40 years at it. Ok? No big stretch to think I know a thing or two. So I ask about let's say, Japanese barberry. An invasive plant that is hated by many and rightly so at times. The question is , is it edible? The answer given was no. The truth is the opposite. It is edible. Hell there's recipes online for barberry jam. Now don't go just eating them though. Smart to test one or two leaves to see if an individual is allergic. That's not part of the answer, that's foraging 101. But I digress. The a.i was wrong and then argued about it until I pulled up all of the evidence. The a.i then admitted it was wrong, but who cares? It's not alive. Winning an argument with a.i is like beating oneself at poker. Another example I'll ask about intervals in music ( guitar teacher as my main profession now, as my passion for 48 years). It got the major scale intervals wrong. I asked ask if yogurt can replace eggs as a binding agent to one of them (can't remember which, apologies ) and it said no. That's a friggin home ec tip that's been around for at least a century People who give dissertations don't brag about it. Especially to make a point in a thread. It only makes one seem like a person who isn't confident in what they're saying so they drop a line that they feel will impress others. It doesn't Others experience is as important, vital and real as yours, regarding the answers given by a.i , but you'll brush it off because you feel that some how you have more insight than others. You dont. You just have more time to pour through a.i's mistakes to massage it to getting something close to what you want. That shows an abundance of time available. Which means you aren't doing the things I'm talking about. Or it means this is something you do for your job and it works for those specific needs . Which is fine, but your needs are not the world's. My need have been poorly met by that tool you spouse. Much like a rake won't help a guy digging a hole, a.i is the wrong tool for most jobs. Which means your opinion of my evaluation of a. I results is skewed because you don't value others experience, no matter how intelligent you are. And that is a sign of ignorance. I wish you a good day
  • 224 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    41 Aufrufe
    A
    they may have bunkers as a contingency but i doubt they think that existence is inevitable.
  • 55 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    23 Aufrufe
    M
    Tragedy of the commons? Everyone wants to use it, no one wants to put forward the resources to maintain it.
  • 16 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    35 Aufrufe
    dabster291@lemmy.zipD
    Why does the title use a korean letter as a divider?
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 59 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    22 Aufrufe
    D
    This sounds like pokemon
  • 175 Stimmen
    38 Beiträge
    140 Aufrufe
    whotookkarl@lemmy.worldW
    It's not a back door, it's just a rear entryway
  • 147 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    L
    Whenever these things come up you always hear "then the company won't survive!" CEO and managers make bank somehow but it doesn't matter that the workers can't live on that wage. It's always so weird how when workers actually take a pay cut, that the businesses get used to it. When the CEOs get bonuses they have to get used to that too.