Skip to content

The bizarre, dismal page you see if you open YouTube without an account.

Technology
77 61 515
  • [Horses] Phones Ruined Everything

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    16 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    M
    I found this really interesting and thought provoking. I loved the line how ultimate optimism is not always misplaced.
  • HMD is ‘scaling back’ in the US, killing Nokia all over again

    Technology technology
    8
    1
    101 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    64 Aufrufe
    realitista@lemmy.worldR
    They've also been reborn as a health devices manufacturer, Withings.
  • 2 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    26 Aufrufe
    vanth@reddthat.comV
    I only vacation in countries that have trained their LLMs to use line breaks.
  • The New Digg’s Plan to Use AI for Community Moderation

    Technology technology
    17
    1
    32 Stimmen
    17 Beiträge
    85 Aufrufe
    L
    trying to be reddit 2.0
  • 895 Stimmen
    204 Beiträge
    366 Aufrufe
    S
    I know what an LLM is doing. You don't know what your brain is doing.
  • 461 Stimmen
    89 Beiträge
    345 Aufrufe
    M
    It dissolves into salt water. Except it doesn't dissolve, this is not the term they should be using, you can't just dry out the water and get the plastic back. It breaks down into other things. I'm pretty sure an ocean full of dissolved plastic would be a way worse ecological disaster than the current microplastic problem... I've seen like 3-4 articles about this now and they all use the term dissolve and it's pissing me off.
  • Bill Gates to give away 99% of his wealth in the next 20 years

    Technology technology
    21
    150 Stimmen
    21 Beiträge
    105 Aufrufe
    G
    hehehehe You know, it's hilarious that you say that. Nobody ever realizes that they're talking to a starving homeless person on the internet when they meet one, do they? Believe it or not, quite a few of us do have jobs. Not all of us are disabled or addicted. That is the problem with the society we live in. We're invisible until we talk to you.
  • Microsoft Bans Employees From Using DeepSeek App

    Technology technology
    11
    1
    121 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    56 Aufrufe
    L
    (Premise - suppose I accept that there is such a definable thing as capitalism) I'm not sure why you feel the need to state this in a discussion that already assumes it as a necessary precondition of, but, uh, you do you. People blaming capitalism for everything then build a country that imports grain, while before them and after them it’s among the largest exporters on the planet (if we combine Russia and Ukraine for the “after” metric, no pun intended). ...what? What does this have to do with literally anything, much less my comment about innovation/competition? Even setting aside the wild-assed assumptions you're making about me criticizing capitalism means I 'blame [it] for everything', this tirade you've launched into, presumably about Ukraine and the USSR, has no bearing on anything even tangentially related to this conversation. People praising capitalism create conditions in which there’s no reason to praise it. Like, it’s competitive - they kill competitiveness with patents, IP, very complex legal systems. It’s self-regulating and self-optimizing - they make regulations and do bailouts preventing sick companies from dying, make laws after their interests, then reactively make regulations to make conditions with them existing bearable, which have a side effect of killing smaller companies. Please allow me to reiterate: ...what? Capitalists didn't build literally any of those things, governments did, and capitalists have been trying to escape, subvert, or dismantle those systems at every turn, so this... vain, confusing attempt to pin a medal on capitalism's chest for restraining itself is not only wrong, it fails to understand basic facts about history. It's the opposite of self-regulating because it actively seeks to dismantle regulations (environmental, labor, wage, etc), and the only thing it optimizes for is the wealth of oligarchs, and maybe if they're lucky, there will be a few crumbs left over for their simps. That’s the problem, both “socialist” and “capitalist” ideal systems ignore ape power dynamics. I'm going to go ahead an assume that 'the problem' has more to do with assuming that complex interacting systems can be simplified to 'ape (or any other animal's) power dynamics' than with failing to let the richest people just do whatever they want. Such systems should be designed on top of the fact that jungle law is always allowed So we should just be cool with everybody being poor so Jeff Bezos or whoever can upgrade his megayacht to a gigayacht or whatever? Let me say this in the politest way I know how: LOL no. Also, do you remember when I said this? ‘Won’t someone please think of the billionaires’ is wearing kinda thin You know, right before you went on this very long-winded, surreal, barely-coherent ramble? Did you imagine I would be convinced by literally any of it when all it amounts to is one giant, extraneous, tedious equivalent of 'Won't someone please think of the billionaires?' Simp harder and I bet maybe you can get a crumb or two yourself.