Skip to content

Samsung phones can survive twice as many charges as Pixel and iPhone, according to EU data

Technology
109 75 0
  • Relo IT

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Final Nokia feature phones coming before HMD deal ends in 2026

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    33 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    B
    HMD feature phones are such a let down. The Polish language translation within the system is clearly automated translation - the words used sometimes don't make sense. CloudFone apps are also not available in Europe. The HMD 110 4G (2024, not 2023) has the Unisoc T127 chipset which supports hotspot, but HMD deliberately chose not to include it. I know because the Itel Neo R60+ has hotspot with the same chipset. At least they made Nokia XR21 in Europe for a while.
  • Climate science

    Technology technology
    12
    2
    138 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    Z
    What is the connection to technology here?
  • IRS tax filing software released to the people as free software

    Technology technology
    14
    288 Stimmen
    14 Beiträge
    33 Aufrufe
    P
    Only if you're a scumbag/useful idiot.
  • Russian Lawmakers Authorize Creation Of National Messaging Service

    Technology technology
    13
    1
    34 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    48 Aufrufe
    C
    Are there substantial numbers of Russians who seriously wouldn't be wise to this?
  • 761 Stimmen
    187 Beiträge
    129 Aufrufe
    O
    Not being a coward.
  • Why doesn't Nvidia have more competition?

    Technology technology
    22
    1
    33 Stimmen
    22 Beiträge
    69 Aufrufe
    B
    It’s funny how the article asks the question, but completely fails to answer it. About 15 years ago, Nvidia discovered there was a demand for compute in datacenters that could be met with powerful GPU’s, and they were quick to respond to it, and they had the resources to focus on it strongly, because of their huge success and high profitability in the GPU market. AMD also saw the market, and wanted to pursue it, but just over a decade ago where it began to clearly show the high potential for profitability, AMD was near bankrupt, and was very hard pressed to finance developments on GPU and compute in datacenters. AMD really tried the best they could, and was moderately successful from a technology perspective, but Nvidia already had a head start, and the proprietary development system CUDA was already an established standard that was very hard to penetrate. Intel simply fumbled the ball from start to finish. After a decade of trying to push ARM down from having the mobile crown by far, investing billions or actually the equivalent of ARM’s total revenue. They never managed to catch up to ARM despite they had the better production process at the time. This was the main focus of Intel, and Intel believed that GPU would never be more than a niche product. So when intel tried to compete on compute for datacenters, they tried to do it with X86 chips, One of their most bold efforts was to build a monstrosity of a cluster of Celeron chips, which of course performed laughably bad compared to Nvidia! Because as it turns out, the way forward at least for now, is indeed the massively parralel compute capability of a GPU, which Nvidia has refined for decades, only with (inferior) competition from AMD. But despite the lack of competition, Nvidia did not slow down, in fact with increased profits, they only grew bolder in their efforts. Making it even harder to catch up. Now AMD has had more money to compete for a while, and they do have some decent compute units, but Nvidia remains ahead and the CUDA problem is still there, so for AMD to really compete with Nvidia, they have to be better to attract customers. That’s a very tall order against Nvidia that simply seems to never stop progressing. So the only other option for AMD is to sell a bit cheaper. Which I suppose they have to. AMD and Intel were the obvious competitors, everybody else is coming from even further behind. But if I had to make a bet, it would be on Huawei. Huawei has some crazy good developers, and Trump is basically forcing them to figure it out themselves, because he is blocking Huawei and China in general from using both AMD and Nvidia AI chips. And the chips will probably be made by Chinese SMIC, because they are also prevented from using advanced production in the west, most notably TSMC. China will prevail, because it’s become a national project, of both prestige and necessity, and they have a massive talent mass and resources, so nothing can stop it now. IMO USA would clearly have been better off allowing China to use American chips. Now China will soon compete directly on both production and design too.
  • Digg founder Kevin Rose offers to buy Pocket from Mozilla

    Technology technology
    7
    2
    1 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    28 Aufrufe
    H
    IMO it was already shitty.