@liaizon@social.wake.st oh fun, NodeBB handles the long emoji fine as well. I can't wait for this to be abused

@kualdir@feddit.nl very slowly for quite a while.

@emperor@feddit.uk it is! The in-development stuff I'm working on makes it much easier to post directly to a Lemmy community. This is probably the first, yes. It was also a bit of a live test at the same time.

@thisismissem@hachyderm.io ah understood. I didn't quite get how the fund worked, but it makes more sense now (and is much simpler—organizationally—for Nivenly!) I don't think we'll add exclusions for security fund recipients I would say, though, that one of the requirements has to be that the affected software accepts the vulnerability. Plenty of self-proclaimed "security researchers" have filed reports, and some go as far as to publish CVEs (against our own software!) without our permission. Quite the opposite of responsible disclosure.

@mariusor@metalhead.club I realized after I replied that I think @reiver@mastodon.social was talking about C2S? Definitely on S2S that's a no-go. There aren't enough guarantees.

@eeeee I believe LemmyBB was a proof-of-concept, to show that Lemmy as it existed back then was able to be represented in the front-end as a tradtional forum. But also, nutomic (who may have made LemmyBB? not sure.) is a busy person who has a day job and doesn't work on lemmy full-time

Good lord @liaizon@social.wake.st did you just necro a 3 year old topic