Skip to content

Signal – an ethical replacement for WhatsApp

Technology
235 140 1.2k
  • 285 Stimmen
    92 Beiträge
    350 Aufrufe
    drdystopia@lemy.lolD
    One runs a mailbox app on any old disused android phone, it temporary stores content and deliver it to the main unit once the connection is restored. Bit simpler to install an app and scan a qr code for the average user compared to even configuring an XMPP client IMO.
  • Microsoft axe another 9000 in continued AI push

    Technology technology
    24
    185 Stimmen
    24 Beiträge
    158 Aufrufe
    J
    Yeah my friend is dating a Google recruiter and he overhears some absurd offers. Like, a reasonable person could retire on a few years at that salary. I have a hypothesis that rich people are bad at money
  • Russia frees REvil hackers after sentencing

    Technology technology
    4
    1
    37 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    31 Aufrufe
    S
    What makes even more sense is that they now might be secretly forced to hack for the government in exchange for bread and water and staying out of prison.
  • Could Windows and installed apps upload all my personal files?

    Technology technology
    2
    1 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    21 Aufrufe
    rikudou@lemmings.worldR
    Yes, every application has access to everything. The only exception are those weird apps that use the universal framework or whatever that thing is called, those need to ask for permissions. But most of the apps on your PC have full access to everything. And Windows does collect and upload a lot of personal information and they could easily upload everything on your system. The same of course applies for the apps as well, they have access to everything except privileged folders (those usually don't contain your personal data, but system files).
  • 138 Stimmen
    31 Beiträge
    157 Aufrufe
    S
    Nobody fucking cares.
  • 75 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    43 Aufrufe
    L
    Police: Arrest you for having an open beer in public Judge: sentences you to prison The PIC:
  • 92 Stimmen
    42 Beiträge
    96 Aufrufe
    G
    You don’t understand. The tracking and spying is the entire point of the maneuver. The ‘children are accessing porn’ thing is just a Trojan horse to justify the spying. I understand what are you saying, I simply don't consider to check if a law is applied as a Trojan horse in itself. I would agree if the EU had said to these sites "give us all the the access log, a list of your subscriber, every data you gather and a list of every IP it ever connected to your site", and even this way does not imply that with only the IP you could know who the user is without even asking the telecom company for help. So, is it a Trojan horse ? Maybe, it heavily depend on how the EU want to do it. If they just ask "show me how you try to avoid that a minor access your material", which normally is the fist step, I don't see how it could be a Trojan horse. It could become, I agree on that. As you pointed out, it’s already illegal for them to access it, and parents are legally required to prevent their children from accessing it. No, parents are not legally required to prevent it. The seller (or provider) is legally required. It is a subtle but important difference. But you don’t lock down the entire population, or institute pre-crime surveillance policies, just because some parents are not going to follow the law. True. You simply impose laws that make mandatories for the provider to check if he can sell/serve something to someone. I mean asking that the cashier of mall check if I am an adult when I buy a bottle of wine is no different than asking to Pornhub to check if the viewer is an adult. I agree that in one case is really simple and in the other is really hard (and it is becoming harder by the day). You then charge the guilty parents after the offense. Ok, it would work, but then how do you caught the offendind parents if not checking what everyone do ? Is it not simpler to try to prevent it instead ?
  • 1 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    54 Aufrufe
    L
    Where and what is texas?