Skip to content

Signal – an ethical replacement for WhatsApp

Technology
235 140 1.2k
  • Microsoft Soars as AI Cloud Boom Drives $595 Price Target

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    7 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    6 Aufrufe
    isaamoonkhgdt_6143@lemmy.zipI
    I wonder if Microsoft will do a stock split in the future?
  • 738 Stimmen
    67 Beiträge
    280 Aufrufe
    K
    That has always been the two big problems with AI. Biases in the training, intentional or not, will always bias the output. And AI is incapable of saying "I do not have suffient training on this subject or reliable sources for it to give you a confident answer". It will always give you its best guess, even if it is completely hallucinating much of the data. The only way to identify the hallucinations if it isn't just saying absurd stuff on the face of it, it to do independent research to verify it, at which point you may as well have just researched it yourself in the first place. AI is a tool, and it can be a very powerful tool with the right training and use cases. For example, I use it at a software engineer to help me parse error codes when googling working or to give me code examples for modules I've never used. There is no small number of times it has been completely wrong, but in my particular use case, that is pretty easy to confirm very quickly. The code either works as expected or it doesn't, and code is always tested before releasing it anyway. In research, it is great at helping you find a relevant source for your research across the internet or in a specific database. It is usually very good at summarizing a source for you to get a quick idea about it before diving into dozens of pages. It CAN be good at helping you write your own papers in a LIMITED capacity, such as cleaning up your writing in your writing to make it clearer, correctly formatting your bibliography (with actual sources you provide or at least verify), etc. But you have to remember that it doesn't "know" anything at all. It isn't sentient, intelligent, thoughtful, or any other personification placed on AI. None of the information it gives you is trustworthy without verification. It can and will fabricate entire studies that do not exist even while attributed to real researcher. It can mix in unreliable information with reliable information becuase there is no difference to it. Put simply, it is not a reliable source of information... ever. Make sure you understand that.
  • 21 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • New Google AdSense Fill Empty In-Page Ads

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    22 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    27 Aufrufe
    S
    I've not seen an ad in years, so they can try to monetize me but will fail spectacularly
  • Men are opening up about mental health to AI instead of humans

    Technology technology
    339
    524 Stimmen
    339 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    spankmonkey@lemmy.worldS
    I'm aware of what you are saying and disagree. You apparently take disagreement personally as most of your comments in that post to various other users are hostile too. Please be aware of how you are approaching discourse.
  • Lighter, Stronger, Smarter: The Rise of Syntactic Foams

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Is the ‘tech bro-ification’ of abortion here?

    Technology technology
    15
    1
    69 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    78 Aufrufe
    T
    Nah. Been working in tech for nearly 30 years, "tech bro" is a delineation. Keeps the fuckers from smearing the rest of us
  • (azazoaoz)

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet