Skip to content

Perplexity offers to buy Google Chrome for $34.5 billion

Technology
51 43 37
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 4 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    17 Aufrufe
    K
    You made this site, you say? What an odd coincidence! Were you inspired by the site you say you "stumbled upon" here? https://lemmy.world/post/33395761 Because it sure seems like the exact same site.
  • Firefox 140 Brings Tab Unload, Custom Search & New ESR

    Technology technology
    41
    1
    234 Stimmen
    41 Beiträge
    565 Aufrufe
    S
    Read again. I quoted something along the lines of "just as much a development decision as a marketing one" and I said, it wasn't a development decision, so what's left? Firefox released just as frequently before, just that they didn’t increase the major version that often. This does not appear to be true. Why don't you take a look at the version history instead of some marketing blog post? https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/releases/ Version 2 had 20 releases within 730 days, averaging one release every 36.5 days. Version 3 had 19 releases within 622 days, averaging 32.7 days per release. But these releases were unscheduled, so they were released when they were done. Now they are on a fixed 90-day schedule, no matter if anything worthwhile was complete or not, plus hotfix releases whenever they are necessary. That's not faster, but instead scheduled, and also they are incrementing the major version even if no major change was included. That's what the blog post was alluding to. In the before times, a major version number increase indicated major changes. Now it doesn't anymore, which means sysadmins still need to consider each release a major release, even if it doesn't contain major changes because it might contain them and the version name doesn't say anything about whether it does or not. It's nothing but a marketing change, moving from "version numbering means something" to "big number go up".
  • Meta publishes V-Jepa 2 – an AI world model

    Technology technology
    3
    1
    9 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    43 Aufrufe
    K
    Yay more hype. Just what we needed more of, it's hype, at last
  • 137 Stimmen
    41 Beiträge
    515 Aufrufe
    R
    And I think you swallowed one too many Apple ads.
  • The British jet engine that failed in the 'Valley of Death'

    Technology technology
    16
    1
    40 Stimmen
    16 Beiträge
    147 Aufrufe
    R
    Giving up advancements in science and technology is stagnation. That's not what I'm suggesting. I'm suggesting giving up some particular, potential advancements in science and tecnology, which is a whole different kettle of fish and does not imply stagnation. Thinking it’s a good idea to not do anything until people are fed and housed is stagnation. Why do you think that?
  • 4 Stimmen
    20 Beiträge
    181 Aufrufe
    V
    Oh, I get it. You're a purposefully ignorant dumbass.
  • Apple Watch Shipments’ Continuous Decline

    Technology technology
    10
    1
    22 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    103 Aufrufe
    A
    i mean as a core feature of a watch/smartwatch in general. garmin is going above and beyond compared to the competition in that area, and that's great. But that doesn't mean every other smartwatch manufacturer arbitrarily locking traditional watch features behind paywalls. and yeah apple does fitness themed commercials for apple watch because it does help with fitness a ton out of the box. just not specifically guided workouts.