Skip to content

Perplexity offers to buy Google Chrome for $34.5 billion

Technology
51 43 22
  • 358 Stimmen
    20 Beiträge
    45 Aufrufe
    S
    They still would, it just wouldn’t have their name on it.
  • Google one 2TB storage + Google gemini pro

    Technology technology
    1
    2 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Broadcom Eyes $2 Trillion Club as AI Chip Demand Explodes

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    39 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    38 Aufrufe
    I
    Selling shovels in a gold rush, can't say I blame them.
  • 73 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    133 Aufrufe
    F
    They have a tiny version that is listed as 1000 on their website, plus the simulation is FOSS
  • Disney+ Confirmed a NEW Change Coming Soon for Subscribers

    Technology technology
    16
    1
    21 Stimmen
    16 Beiträge
    151 Aufrufe
    B
    It's also an article about another article from Variety that actually has a better headline. These things are a pet peeve for me. Hey, here's a story from an actual news service and I'll even include a link to it, but I'm going to post my link all over so people will see the ads on my page instead of theirs. Variety does some good reporting, I've rather they get the clicks.
  • 103 Stimmen
    39 Beiträge
    442 Aufrufe
    P
    This “study” is biased by design. But also even if it weren’t , one study does not prove anything. You’d need a lot more evidence than that.
  • 50 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    98 Aufrufe
    H
    Also fair
  • AI cheating surge pushes schools into chaos

    Technology technology
    25
    45 Stimmen
    25 Beiträge
    296 Aufrufe
    C
    Sorry for the late reply, I had to sit and think on this one for a little bit. I think there are would be a few things going on when it comes to designing a course to teach critical thinking, nuances, and originality; and they each have their own requirements. For critical thinking: The main goal is to provide students with a toolbelt for solving various problems. Then instilling the habit of always asking "does this match the expected outcome? What was I expecting?". So usually courses will be setup so students learn about a tool, practice using the tool, then have a culminating assignment on using all the tools. Ideally, the problems students face at the end require multiple tools to solve. Nuance mainly naturally comes with exposure to the material from a professional - The way a mechanical engineer may describe building a desk will probably differ greatly compared to a fantasy author. You can also explain definitions and industry standards; but thats really dry. So I try to teach nuances via definitions by mixing in the weird nuances as much as possible with jokes. Then for originality; I've realized I dont actually look for an original idea; but something creative. In a classroom setting, you're usually learning new things about a subject so a student's knowledge of that space is usually very limited. Thus, an idea that they've never heard about may be original to them, but common for an industry expert. For teaching originality creativity, I usually provide time to be creative & think, and provide open ended questions as prompts to explore ideas. My courses that require originality usually have it as a part of the culminating assignment at the end where they can apply their knowledge. I'll also add in time where students can come to me with preliminary ideas and I can provide feedback on whether or not it passes the creative threshold. Not all ideas are original, but I sometimes give a bit of slack if its creative enough. The amount of course overhauling to get around AI really depends on the material being taught. For example, in programming - you teach critical thinking by always testing your code, even with parameters that don't make sense. For example: Try to add 123 + "skibbidy", and see what the program does.