Skip to content

Tough, Tiny, and Totally Repairable: Inside the Framework 12

Technology
109 70 423
  • 965 Stimmen
    101 Beiträge
    329 Aufrufe
    D
    That's always worth considering. A phone app doesn't take a big operating budget to launch and maintain. Especially for state-actors.
  • 210 Stimmen
    16 Beiträge
    67 Aufrufe
    J
    It doesn't seem to be the case. As far as I can tell, the law only covers realistic digital imitations of a person's likeness (deepfakes), with an exception for parody and satire. If you appear in public that is effectively license for someone to capture your image.
  • 16 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    37 Aufrufe
    dabster291@lemmy.zipD
    Why does the title use a korean letter as a divider?
  • 311 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    122 Aufrufe
    S
    Same, especially when searching technical or niche topics. Since there aren't a ton of results specific to the topic, mostly semi-related results will appear in the first page or two of a regular (non-Gemini) Google search, just due to the higher popularity of those webpages compared to the relevant webpages. Even the relevant webpages will have lots of non-relevant or semi-relevant information surrounding the answer I'm looking for. I don't know enough about it to be sure, but Gemini is probably just scraping a handful of websites on the first page, and since most of those are only semi-related, the resulting summary is a classic example of garbage in, garbage out. I also think there's probably something in the code that looks for information that is shared across multiple sources and prioritizing that over something that's only on one particular page (possibly the sole result with the information you need). Then, it phrases the summary as a direct answer to your query, misrepresenting the actual information on the pages they scraped. At least Gemini gives sources, I guess. The thing that gets on my nerves the most is how often I see people quote the summary as proof of something without checking the sources. It was bad before the rollout of Gemini, but at least back then Google was mostly scraping text and presenting it with little modification, along with a direct link to the webpage. Now, it's an LLM generating text phrased as a direct answer to a question (that was also AI-generated from your search query) using AI-summarized data points scraped from multiple webpages. It's obfuscating the source material further, but I also can't help but feel like it exposes a little of the behind-the-scenes fuckery Google has been doing for years before Gemini. How it bastardizes your query by interpreting it into a question, and then prioritizes homogeneous results that agree on the "answer" to your "question". For years they've been doing this to a certain extent, they just didn't share how they interpreted your query.
  • 131 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    27 Aufrufe
    P
    This is a tough one for me: I'm opposed to femicide, but I only wish the absolute worst on influencers.
  • All About Backplane Board – Share, Learn & Discuss!

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 6 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    8 Aufrufe
    blue_berry@lemmy.worldB
    Cool. Well, the feedback until now was rather lukewarm. But that's fine, I'm now going more in a P2P-direction. It would be cool to have a way for everybody to participate in the training of big AI models in case HuggingFace enshittifies
  • 5 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    22 Aufrufe
    alphane_moon@lemmy.worldA
    I don't drive and have minimal experience with cars. Does it make a big difference whether your Android Automotive solution is based on Android 13 or 15? It's been a long time since I've cared about OS upgrades for Android on smartphones, perhaps the situation is different with Android Automotive?