JD Vance gets suspended from Bluesky 'just 12 minutes after first post': reports
Technology
31
Beiträge
18
Kommentatoren
0
Aufrufe
-
This post did not contain any content.
He’s a Nazi
-
This post did not contain any content.
Imagine not being American and having to read about the American soap opera in your technology community and everywhere else.
-
Imagine not being American and having to read about the American soap opera in your technology community and everywhere else.
I imagine world war 3 will be even more frustrating
What can i say except “you’re welcome!”?
-
He’s a Nazi
he's too spineless to be a nazi. He's just a lying opportunistic asshole
-
This post did not contain any content.
OP's link is just an incomplete summary of the real article
That source post has this Bluesky quote:
Vice President Vance’s account was briefly flagged by our automated systems that try to detect impersonation attempts which have targeted public figures like him in the past. The account was quickly restored and verified
Also, that it would have been heavily flagged by users was probably part of it.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Its ok if they reinstated his account.
He was put on the major block lists that most users use to block maga trolls. Enjoy your empty feed, butt plug. You're welcome.
-
he's too spineless to be a nazi. He's just a lying opportunistic asshole
Being spineless is requisite for being a Nazi
As is being an opportunistic asshole.
He chose to be a Nazi. Literally called trump “americas Hitler”.
He’s a Nazi. All republicans are now nazis.
Concentration camps is a Nazi thing
Secret police is a Nazi thing
Hitler is a Nazi thing.
All those people are Nazis.
I’m not joking around. This is serious as it gets.
-
This post did not contain any content.
What a shitty click baity article. Not sure who should be more ashamed, the writer, the editor, or anyone who would share it.
-
What a shitty click baity article. Not sure who should be more ashamed, the writer, the editor, or anyone who would share it.
Why? He was suspended minutes after posting.
Then he was unsuspended. The first suspension still happened.
People need to understand that the headline is there to get you to read the article. No headline is going to tell you all the details.
Read the article.
-
Why? He was suspended minutes after posting.
Then he was unsuspended. The first suspension still happened.
People need to understand that the headline is there to get you to read the article. No headline is going to tell you all the details.
Read the article.
It was an automated system to prevent impersonation accounts which the actual news article this was based off of mentioned.
-
Imagine not being American and having to read about the American soap opera in your technology community and everywhere else.
Yeah it's inescapable really. Many people probably are more up to date with American politics than those of their own country.
-
It was an automated system to prevent impersonation accounts which the actual news article this was based off of mentioned.
Was he not suspended in 12 minutes?
-
Why? He was suspended minutes after posting.
Then he was unsuspended. The first suspension still happened.
People need to understand that the headline is there to get you to read the article. No headline is going to tell you all the details.
Read the article.
You don't think that the omission of the very relevant followup fact from the title is misleading, perhaps intentionally so, to someone only glancing at headlines?
Imagine if the police were looking for your neighbor, mistook your house for theirs, arrested you thinking you were them, then minutes later released you when they realized their error. Would an article titled 'TachyonTele arrested in own home' be a fair summary of those events?
-
Imagine not being American and having to read about the American soap opera in your technology community and everywhere else.
Imagine
not being Americanbeing a US'ian having critical and rational thinking skills and having to read about the American soap opera inyourour technology community and everywhere else.
️ 
️ 
🫏 
-
You don't think that the omission of the very relevant followup fact from the title is misleading, perhaps intentionally so, to someone only glancing at headlines?
Imagine if the police were looking for your neighbor, mistook your house for theirs, arrested you thinking you were them, then minutes later released you when they realized their error. Would an article titled 'TachyonTele arrested in own home' be a fair summary of those events?
People really need to understand that headlines are not the entire article. I'm curious how and when that disconnect happened.
RE: your edit.
Articles have a summary for a reason. Then they have details. -
People really need to understand that headlines are not the entire article. I'm curious how and when that disconnect happened.
RE: your edit.
Articles have a summary for a reason. Then they have details.Simply adding one word would have made the title much less misleading.
'JD Vance gets briefly suspended from bluesky 'just 12 minutes after first post''
As it stands, it strongly implies that his first post caused him to get suspended, and that he's still suspended now. I'm not even sure why this is considered newsworthy. Why did someone even bother writing this article? Answer is, I'd wager, because the headline makes it sound sensational when it's in fact not, and it drives clicks.
-
Simply adding one word would have made the title much less misleading.
'JD Vance gets briefly suspended from bluesky 'just 12 minutes after first post''
As it stands, it strongly implies that his first post caused him to get suspended, and that he's still suspended now. I'm not even sure why this is considered newsworthy. Why did someone even bother writing this article? Answer is, I'd wager, because the headline makes it sound sensational when it's in fact not, and it drives clicks.
I recommend going into journalism and being the change you want to see.
Nothing you say here will change anything you're nitpicking to death.
It's simply not that serious. -
Imagine not being American and having to read about the American soap opera in your technology community and everywhere else.
It becomes very fatiguing. Especially when the same article is posted in several places.
To make things worse, it's a trash article. It's literally just quoting another article. So it's bot scraped, bot written, title generated with zing and spooned to idiot cohorts on places like this, simply to garner traffic.
There are a lot of simple users on Lemmy, though they'd hate to admit it. But we have this post in this community with those comments, soooo..... GG, big brains
-
Imagine not being American and having to read about the American soap opera in your technology community and everywhere else.
Hey! Whoa! Our government is NOT a soap opera!
Soap operas are entertaining, and have lots of revealing love affairs. Nobody is sleeping with J.D. Vance.
I mean, ew. It's J.D Vance! Do YOU want to sleep with J.D Vance? No? Yeah, exactly. Not a soap opera!
-
It becomes very fatiguing. Especially when the same article is posted in several places.
To make things worse, it's a trash article. It's literally just quoting another article. So it's bot scraped, bot written, title generated with zing and spooned to idiot cohorts on places like this, simply to garner traffic.
There are a lot of simple users on Lemmy, though they'd hate to admit it. But we have this post in this community with those comments, soooo..... GG, big brains
So it’s bot scraped, bot written, title generated with zing and spooned to idiot cohorts on places like this, simply to garner traffic.
And they say real journalism isn't dead!
