Skip to content

‘FuckLAPD.com’ Lets Anyone Use Facial Recognition to Instantly Identify Cops

Technology
214 99 2.0k
  • 74 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    37 Aufrufe
    R
    Where exactly are they changing it there, negative offense? Another wonder weapon? LOL
  • I was wrong about robots.txt

    Technology technology
    23
    1
    84 Stimmen
    23 Beiträge
    142 Aufrufe
    E
    Right, but the article does. Anyway, I'm moving on. Thanks for the discussion.
  • 36 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    101 Aufrufe
    naur@tech.pr0n.plN
    That was a feature where you could attach an analog receiver to their Goggles v2. They have since removed it in newer Goggle versions. Their system is basically a walled garden now.
  • Is Matrix cooked?

    Technology technology
    54
    101 Stimmen
    54 Beiträge
    216 Aufrufe
    W
    Didn't know it only applied to UWP apps on Windows. That does seem like a pretty big problem then. it is mostly for compatibility reasons. no win32 programs are equipped to handle such granular permissions and sandboxing, they are all made with the assumption that they have access to whatever they need (other than other users' resources and things that require elevation). if Microsoft would have made that limitation to every kind of software, that Windows version would have probably been a failure in popularity because lots of software would have broken. I think S editions of windows is how they tried to go in that direction, with a more drastic way of simply just dropping support for 3rd party win32 programs. I don't still have a Mac readily available to test with but afaik it is any application that uses Apple's packaging format. ok, so if you run linux or windows utils in a compatibility layer, they still have less of a limited access? by which I mean graphical utilities. just tried with firefox, for macos it wanted to give me an .iso file (???) if so, it seems apple is doing roughly the same as microsoft with uwp and the appx format, and linux with flatpak: it's a choice for the user
  • 294 Stimmen
    72 Beiträge
    337 Aufrufe
    kittyjynx@lemmy.worldK
    Just drink some Popov grade Trump Vodka at one of his many totally not bankrupt casinos to take your mind off of it.
  • 54 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    44 Aufrufe
    F
    After some further reading it seems obvious that the two incidents are entirely unrelated, but it was a fun rabbit hole for a sec!
  • 846 Stimmen
    133 Beiträge
    573 Aufrufe
    A
    reminds me of the time when something with Amazon was Indian employees
  • 1 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    39 Aufrufe
    L
    I made a PayPal account like 20 years ago in a third world country. The only thing you needed then is an email and password. I have no real name on there and no PII, technically my bank card is attached but on PP itself there's no KYC. I think you could probably use some types of prepaid cards with it if you want to avoid using a bank altogether but for me this wasn't an issue, I just didn't want my ID on any records, I don't have any serious OpSec concerns otherwise. I'm sure you could either buy PayPal accounts like this if you needed to, or make one in a country that doesn't have KYC laws somehow. From there I'd add money to my balance and send money as F&F. At no point did I need an ID so in that sense there's no KYC. Some sellers on localmarket were fancy enough to list that they wanted an ID for KYC, but I'm sure you could just send them any random ID you made in paint from the republic of dave and you'd be fine.