Skip to content

Reddit users in the UK must now upload selfies to access NSFW subreddits

Technology
269 180 903
  • 300 Stimmen
    47 Beiträge
    308 Aufrufe
    T
    I worked in a bank for a bit. Literally any transaction that's large and unusual for the account will be flagged. Also people do bonkers things with their money for the stupidest reasons all the time so all that one has to do if they're making large transactions is be prepared to talk to the bank and explain what's going on. Unless of course you are handling money in relation to organized crime, in which case you were fucked the moment the money touched the banking system
  • Musk's X sues New York state over social media hate speech law

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 85K – A Melhor Opção para Quem Busca Diversão e Recompensas

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    13 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 137 Stimmen
    16 Beiträge
    77 Aufrufe
    H
    My ports are on the front of the router. No backdoors for me, checkmate Atheists.
  • 92 Stimmen
    42 Beiträge
    181 Aufrufe
    G
    You don’t understand. The tracking and spying is the entire point of the maneuver. The ‘children are accessing porn’ thing is just a Trojan horse to justify the spying. I understand what are you saying, I simply don't consider to check if a law is applied as a Trojan horse in itself. I would agree if the EU had said to these sites "give us all the the access log, a list of your subscriber, every data you gather and a list of every IP it ever connected to your site", and even this way does not imply that with only the IP you could know who the user is without even asking the telecom company for help. So, is it a Trojan horse ? Maybe, it heavily depend on how the EU want to do it. If they just ask "show me how you try to avoid that a minor access your material", which normally is the fist step, I don't see how it could be a Trojan horse. It could become, I agree on that. As you pointed out, it’s already illegal for them to access it, and parents are legally required to prevent their children from accessing it. No, parents are not legally required to prevent it. The seller (or provider) is legally required. It is a subtle but important difference. But you don’t lock down the entire population, or institute pre-crime surveillance policies, just because some parents are not going to follow the law. True. You simply impose laws that make mandatories for the provider to check if he can sell/serve something to someone. I mean asking that the cashier of mall check if I am an adult when I buy a bottle of wine is no different than asking to Pornhub to check if the viewer is an adult. I agree that in one case is really simple and in the other is really hard (and it is becoming harder by the day). You then charge the guilty parents after the offense. Ok, it would work, but then how do you caught the offendind parents if not checking what everyone do ? Is it not simpler to try to prevent it instead ?
  • 44 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    26 Aufrufe
    V
    I use it for my self hosted apps, but yeah, it's rarely useful for websites in the wild.
  • 0 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    31 Aufrufe
    V
    they should be required to be designed to be safe in the way people actually use them, as opposed to this hypothetical driver who has duct taped thier hands to the wheel...
  • 0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    24 Aufrufe
    G
    Wow... Just learned about that NOW. I wanted to play some games today and wondered why my account doesnt work nor the "forgot password"-Function... Fuck Meta. Fuck Oculus... Fuck this whole Enshittification that is going on lately... Is there ANY Way, to get my CV1 to run Without an account?!