This is an interesting observation: I responded to someone's public post on a Mastodon (glitch) server as a private message (I have a toggle in my Compose interface that allows me to control that).
ActivityPub Test Kategorie
2
Beiträge
2
Kommentatoren
0
Aufrufe
-
This is an interesting observation: I responded to someone's public post on a Mastodon (glitch) server as a private message (I have a toggle in my Compose interface that allows me to control that). That message went out fine and they received it, although I'm not sure what the UI looked like.
Their response #ActivityPub message from Mastodon however was unusable. I found it in my database, but the
toandccfields were empty.{ "cc": [], "to": [], "type": "Create", ... }I suppose I could still pull these up for the UI using the
inReplyTofield. But blanking out the address fields seems like a weird choice for #Mastodon. -
This is an interesting observation: I responded to someone's public post on a Mastodon (glitch) server as a private message (I have a toggle in my Compose interface that allows me to control that). That message went out fine and they received it, although I'm not sure what the UI looked like.
Their response #ActivityPub message from Mastodon however was unusable. I found it in my database, but the
toandccfields were empty.{ "cc": [], "to": [], "type": "Create", ... }I suppose I could still pull these up for the UI using the
inReplyTofield. But blanking out the address fields seems like a weird choice for #Mastodon.jdt@enigmatick.social could it be a mistake in the reply?
For example, if the reply had all of the mentions removed I would think Mastodon would send out an object with empty to and cc.
