Skip to content

Study: Remote working benefits fathers while childless men miss sense of community

Technology
170 113 561
  • (LLM) A language model built for the public good

    Technology technology
    14
    1
    122 Stimmen
    14 Beiträge
    6 Aufrufe
    T
    No you rude fuck. If i ask a simple question about a subject, let's say foraging as a I do that a lot. And it's wrong, it's friggin wrong. I'll ask about a specific plant. Full disclosure this is one of my things. 40 years at it. Ok? No big stretch to think I know a thing or two. So I ask about let's say, Japanese barberry. An invasive plant that is hated by many and rightly so at times. The question is , is it edible? The answer given was no. The truth is the opposite. It is edible. Hell there's recipes online for barberry jam. Now don't go just eating them though. Smart to test one or two leaves to see if an individual is allergic. That's not part of the answer, that's foraging 101. But I digress. The a.i was wrong and then argued about it until I pulled up all of the evidence. The a.i then admitted it was wrong, but who cares? It's not alive. Winning an argument with a.i is like beating oneself at poker. Another example I'll ask about intervals in music ( guitar teacher as my main profession now, as my passion for 48 years). It got the major scale intervals wrong. I asked ask if yogurt can replace eggs as a binding agent to one of them (can't remember which, apologies ) and it said no. That's a friggin home ec tip that's been around for at least a century People who give dissertations don't brag about it. Especially to make a point in a thread. It only makes one seem like a person who isn't confident in what they're saying so they drop a line that they feel will impress others. It doesn't Others experience is as important, vital and real as yours, regarding the answers given by a.i , but you'll brush it off because you feel that some how you have more insight than others. You dont. You just have more time to pour through a.i's mistakes to massage it to getting something close to what you want. That shows an abundance of time available. Which means you aren't doing the things I'm talking about. Or it means this is something you do for your job and it works for those specific needs . Which is fine, but your needs are not the world's. My need have been poorly met by that tool you spouse. Much like a rake won't help a guy digging a hole, a.i is the wrong tool for most jobs. Which means your opinion of my evaluation of a. I results is skewed because you don't value others experience, no matter how intelligent you are. And that is a sign of ignorance. I wish you a good day
  • Why This Python Performance Trick Doesn’t Matter Anymore

    Technology technology
    4
    1
    66 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    28 Aufrufe
    S
    I'm surprised about the module lookup thing, since I assumed it was just syntax sugar to do from ... import .... We do the from syntax almost everywhere, but I've been replacing huge import blocks with a module import (e.g. constants) just to clean up the imports a bit and git conflicts. Looks like I'll need to keep this in mind until we upgrade to 3.13.
  • 148 Stimmen
    92 Beiträge
    128 Aufrufe
    B
    You don't even need a VPN. Only the legit sites will play ball. Porn will still be there.
  • 1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 175 Stimmen
    38 Beiträge
    140 Aufrufe
    whotookkarl@lemmy.worldW
    It's not a back door, it's just a rear entryway
  • 5 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Mazda DMCA takedown of Open Source Home Assistant App

    Technology technology
    6
    108 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    30 Aufrufe
    S
    Soon this all will be much easier. From 12 of September we’re going into a new world of EU Data Act that forces all companies to allow third parties to communicate with iot devices. Which a car is. So soon Mazda will need to provide those APIs in an official way.
  • 88 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    24 Aufrufe
    C
    Won't someone think of the shareholders?!